31
Technical Support / Re: Private testnet questions
« on: October 06, 2019, 08:16:49 pm »
Is that the cryptobridge gateway? Then you have to ask them how to do it.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Losing pegg for a described timeframe is not as bad as losing big part of the community and their trust because bitshares can't protect debt holders from obvious price manipulation.
Who is going to take the risk to create debt if bitshares shows that everyone can manipulate them like he is pleased.
it really reflect the ideas from the community and the team.
I don't think this will do bad to smartcoins.
stop maintaining the peg when we can't afford to maintain it.
The cost to maintain the peg "in all conditions" is simply too big for us. Better to give up at some point.
Who is "we" and "us", and what cost is associated with feeding the external price?
The obvious point where we can't maintain the peg anymore is GS price, and we have already agreed to not feed below it.
Why do you want to feed above GS if real price is lower, personal interests aside?
Feeding an arbitrary price that has nothing to do with market conditions is (once again) a kick in the ass of every smartcoin holder.
Why you always take the side of smartcoin holders ?
People are blocking to fight price manipulation so why should debt holder suffer from it?
Also bitshares community is already so small and not growing do you want to lose the next group ?
A major smartcoin holder has already said his opinion and blocking any movement to protect against price manipulation with the words .....I give a fuck if debt holders will get rekkt.
So why should debt holders give a fuck if he is losing his pegg if its him blocking any protection against price manipulation.
Where is your solution or discussion for price manipulation btw ?
Why don't you get upset that bitshares debt holders get rekkt because of price feed manipulation ?
Haven't seen any active discussion from you there.....only always if its about protecting the smartcoin.
stop maintaining the peg when we can't afford to maintain it.
The cost to maintain the peg "in all conditions" is simply too big for us. Better to give up at some point.
vote is shi*t, holder is shi*t?
the worker mechanism is just like a man to seek better life by selling blood.
yes, when he is strong and in good health, maybe there is no problem, but when he is seriously ill and is going to die, I don't think I can suggest him to sell blood without stop.
I believe they were created prior to market fee sharing and there is no way to reenable those flagsThere should be an option to allow the changes of market fees. -> hardfork
According to rough statistics, the total amount of funds applied for by all of the workers this year is about 26 million yuan, and about 8 million yuan has been allocated.
None of the projects have been fully allocated except for one worker named “steemfest”.
Now the funding gap is more than 16 million yuan, and now the daily BTS trading volume is even less than 2 million yuan.It is clear that in such a flagging market, the withdrawal of such a large amount of money will inevitably lead to the collapse of BTS prices.
We already know:
MCR = 2.0 -> low liquidity -> unsafe
MCR = 1.01 -> unlimited liquidity -> 100% safe