331
General Discussion / Re: question about private key of BTS
« on: May 27, 2015, 10:51:30 pm »Those 8 bytes are a pointer to the private key which is 32 bytes.thanks
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Those 8 bytes are a pointer to the private key which is 32 bytes.thanks
1. I support develop 100% pay rate delegate personally , and I also think they have done great work for ecosystem personally.So you want to destroy the dev staff?No , I just want dev staff can gain more usd by 100% pay delegate
What you propose does not make sense. Wait until DPoS 2.0 and THEN decide. It's only a few short days ahead.
I interpret what you say here to mean you think if we remove more of the 100% delegates that there will be more BTS paid to the remaining 100% delegates?
That at least makes more sense. Perhaps we're dealing with a poor choice of words in the OP, or communication failure due to the "twitter phenomenon" (he who uses minimal words cause confused meaning).
Nevetheless, if you take the OP at face value, he is calling for the removal of ALL 100% DELEGATES, a category that most if not all of the devs fall into. That does NOT make sense. This sounds like a wealth redistribution plan, a way to "equalize" the earnings of all participants, rather than letting it go to where it is merited based on the returned value to the ecosystem. Without devs we have no ecosystem.
@OP - care to try again to clarify what your intention is? Sorry for any difficulties the language difference may cause you.
设计成 可以按照自己发行的bta的总量,自动分配一定数量的 锚定资产(BitCNY等),一键分红,那就很棒了应该是在计划中,其实实现过程和上次合并时候的空投bts 类似。
I hope no one individual have "voting power" to put a delegate in the top 101.Keep in mind that I am managing 77M BTS that belong to a whale who was never an I3 stakeholder and could demand them at any time... erm .. sure ..
but can you "confirm" that you do not control enough 'voting power' anymore to put a delegate in the top 101 on your own?
So you want to destroy the dev staff?No , I just want dev staff can gain more usd by 100% pay delegate
What you propose does not make sense. Wait until DPoS 2.0 and THEN decide. It's only a few short days ahead.
cooleo .. now we need some more solid information about what exactly NOTE will "do"yes I also don`t know what exactly note will do
跟个提问贴:1、我的钱包无法在内盘交易,但可以转账,经常显示wrong string,请问如何修复? 2.missing signature (31005) 是个啥问题? 求助。新注册账号,将币转到新账号。
待到夏日六月八,买了BTS都要发?我错过了太多消息了吗,
狂暴开启冲月球,我却怀疑是空话。
自从装了0.9钱包,右下角就总是出现:严重网络问题,数据的同步时断时续,兄弟们你们也是这样么?这是在搞笑么?在同步没有完成的时候,都显示为“严重网络问题” 同步完成后就好了。
如果是开会,乱发言当然占用别人时间。这是在网上,没人逼着你听,逼着你看,逼着你回复,浪费什么时间?不管什么提议,总有人赞成,有人反对,难道怕有人反对连拿出来讨论都不敢了?越卖关子越让人怀疑这样做的动机。如果是好的提议,为什么不马上拿出来?另一方面,反对也没用,到时候发布一个硬分叉,还不都乖乖跟着升级?DPOS的好处就是方便管理,每天都能硬分叉。比特币改一个块大小都要研究半天,一年以后还不知道能不能改得成。在这里这么点改动还不是分分钟的事?矿工,在BTC并不是最大利益的人在主宰BTC的发展,实际证明改块区大小和矿工没有任何直接利益关系,他们当然希望维持现状。
wuyanren I know you , and I also know what you thinkIs it that everyone feels like stan as blind confidence better?I complained that many basic things are not good, but to see developers to indulge in verbiageWtf is wrong with people here... You bitch when price falls and you bitch when price rises. You bitch when there's a new release and you bitch about the current release.wuyanren is a famous bitch from chinese community.
Bunch of angry bitches
he complain everything everyday.