Stuck on block:2114936

>> info

{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 2114936,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "42 hours old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2015-03-25T00:17:10",
  "blockchain_head_block_id": "775cc408c980767ad6a6da436c84b509d4da4e5d",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "0.66 %",

Can I use the resync command to do this?

Mine is having the same problem! 

I think that somehow we are on the forked chain. I typed the following command:

>> info

{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 2114936,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "21 hours old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2015-03-25T00:17:10",
  "blockchain_head_block_id": "775cc408c980767ad6a6da436c84b509d4da4e5d",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "1.35 %",

Only 1.35% of delegates are participating? That's why I'm assuming that I'm on the fork.

Will updating to 8.1 as a non-delegate screw me up? Or does anyone have a better ELI5 solution? Sorry for my lack of proficiency in coding.

Good job everyone! 

bitUSD + Open Bazaar.

As long as there is barely any volume in bitUSD I see no point in spending effort on getting volume in these other commodities.

Without liquidity, this exchange is worthless. However, it's brand new, bugs are being worked out, the developers have been doing an excellent job. It's part of how new software is made, it needs to be streamlined and easy to use/access. I can't even update the btsx wallet bc my internet connection is so slow (Hawaii). I'm looking forward to the lightweight client, that will make it easy enough for normal users. We don't want people to come in too soon and taint their experience with slow/buggy beta software. Once these things are fixed, let's push for liquidity, and serious marketing. Everyone involved in ownership of the exchange (all btsx holders) should help in the marketing campaign.

Once we get liquidity, adding additional bitassets will come with the free market's demand. But yeah, it's great that you're thinking ahead and it seems like a very comprehensive list.

I like your suggestions on cryptos, I think the higher volume cryptos could be added sooner than later. It kills two birds with one stone, marketing within crypto-space and overall liquidity. But even this needs to be done once a less buggy software comes along. We don't want to give a bad first impression among the non-committed tech savvy users. However, I do think cryptonerds know what beta software entails.


 

What's up with this? I don't really see how bitshares play is related to charity? Is this a mistake?