Removed my support from Abit as committee.
He changed the last months dramaticly to no work ethics.
He has no problems with bribes,inside deals,support scam workers (which he admited on tg) and voting not based on how supportive someone is for bitshares but how quite a witness is on scams like the scam exchange.
Here his talk about deciding why a witness should be voted in or out
dima was spreading hates in the groups, while lafona kept silence. so actually I'd rather vote for lafona
so vote buyng is fine?
if the outcome is positive, it's fine for me.
Discussion between another Dev and Abit about paying 2 times for the same audit on the core prelude worker
$75/h to abit and later for the same work 3% of all funding to bbf
Of course no vote buying with reserve pool ?
There is way way more where he is justifying bad actions.These two are just from today
This is exactly how Dima tricked me into a conversation to make me look like a bad guy. That's one of the reasons that I don't like to vote for him.
You often copy paste selectively without full context, which is a shame on you.
I haven't changed. I'm all for pushing forward and making progresses. You had supported this, thank you for that. Admittedly some progresses require compromises. I mainly look at the final results aka the overall outcomes which I mentioned in the conversation. Focus more on the big picture, but not the peanuts.
Rome is not built in one day, we have to go forward step by step, little by little. The spirit of the new core worker is just in this direction, work on the easily achieved things first aka the low-hanging fruits, but not blindly rush into some imaginations of fancy features which require much efforts but don't know who will use or benefit from.
Wish you the best.
Like Bingo asked tell us about the big picture because currently i see only garbage and nothing more.
Getting the old structure and abuse back we had before
Bitcrab/Jademont/ZB/Abit with the help of BEOS.
Would i remove my support from last 2 western neutral committee all what is left are committee from cn-vote and beos.
Very dangerous as they have clearly big diffrences in responsiblity and ethics.
Witnesses like Dima or clockwork were voted out because CN-Vote supports witnesses from BEOS who provide NOTHING to bitshares in exchange to get their witnesses voted up.
What bigger picture do we have here when killing our supporters which provide progress and infra like ES Node in exchange for nothing?
Same goes for committee and the inside deal between cn-vote and beos to vote 3 of their members in exchange to vote members from cn-vote in.
You asking me hours after i removed my vote from jonathan to keep some neutral members in committee (at the same day you (cn-vote/bitcrab) voted them in as committee showed me you were aware of the inside deal if not even took activly part in it.
Haven't seen Liondani or Evangelist participating in committee since you voted them in.
Chinese committee members are only in their own closed group not even in the committee wechat group which have been created and are only voting when bitcrab creates a proposal.
So what is the bigger picture here ?That bitcrab doesn't need support of committee anymore to change something but just ask chinese committee members from cn-vote to approve something without any discussion outside of cn-vote closed group ?
A small chinese group clearly misusing the votes from ZB for their own agenda.
What is the bigger picture here ?
You talk about compromise ?
Which compromise did the chinese group do when dictating 100% of core roadmap without consultation with rest of community ?
The core prelude work is crap.
Irrelevant to bitshares at this stage.
So what is the bigger picture other than dividing the community forcing the rest to accept only your own vision which bitcrab proofed in the past already multiple times to be wrong.
What is the bigger picture to support scam exchanges at all cost where the community was clearly divided and you knowing that volumes are total fake ?
Are you sure chinese are able to make anymore good decissions ?
Am asking because since old leadership from cn-vote got kicked out when raising their concern about the wrong route cn-vote is going i saw not a single action from cn-vote which would uphold the standards of old leadership.
All i see are inside deals,scam worker support and forcing the whole community to accept the view of a small chinese group.
You say you have majority of votes.
I disagree you buy votes.You are not better than BEOS.BEOS is supporting cn-vote ONLY because they hope to get a favour vote back from cn-vote to fund the integration of BEOS via bitshares reserve pool.
So you don't have the majority of community.You are vote buying and nothing more.
Also the diffrence between active worker and not is just 30 million votes even you bought votes from BEOS.
But i'm happy to hear the bigger picture which i'm unable to see.
I guess i can't see that a $5/day profit from fees is going to bring bitshares forward.
People lost trust in gateways and you focus on taking fees on the last 2 signifant gateways we have.
What i see is a dangerous situation where committee is now in full control of cn-vote and witnesses being replaced based on inside deals for selfish profit only.You are destroying bitshares infrastructur by doing this.
After that i see support of scam workers and most disgusting a cowork with some people from cn-vote and beos to get their integration funded for the benefit of BEOS owners ONLY....
But hey i don't see the bigger picture.........waiting for you to explain us the bigger picture
Btw how come cn-vote and ZB added simultanously their votes for BEOS witnesses when making an inside deal ?
ZB being driven by a high ranked chinese member aka bitcrab ?
Also i would like to ask since bitshares is a trustles decentralized project why cn-vote is supporting centralization of bitshares giving power to one person ?
A single person holding on bitshares
Domain
Brand
Legal
Core
Infra
New Forum
Escrow
Move Institut
makes bitshares decentralized ?