一碗水端平,如果不支持AGS2.0流动 为啥就支持PTS那个+15%的方案呢?
Please elaborate on this point. What did you mean by "equal justice"?
(I'm not sure my Google translation is correct - perhaps a few more words would help?)
when doate PTS to AGS ,donater based on a expectation that sooner or later PTS get to 2000k &AGS get to 2000k
DACs give PTS 10%&AGS 10%。single PTS&AGS get 0.1/2,000,000=0.00000005 of DACs each.
apart of Liquidity,AGS&PTS are totaly equal shares。
if pts 1700k ags 2000k
then single pts get 17.647% more than ags。 this will change the strategy of donate。
一碗水端平 is chinese slang means equally treat
My solution is
1.the rest unmined PTS (about 300k) Merged into the DAC development fund(AGS fund)
2.the rest unmined PTS (about 300k) unlocked at PTS average mining speed
3.DAC fund as growing snowball,when it can self-sufficiency &strong enough , then feedback PTS&AGS in the form of new DACs or bonus
because
the remaining 300k PTS used to pay the miners for keeping PTS network running.
Now with the help of AGS fund, the development of more advanced, efficient and low cost DPOS replaced the backward, inefficient and expensive POW.
Save the cost of 300k PTS fee.
if 200 days AGS donation fund (BTC and PTS )run out of money,the rest unmined PTS (about 300k) would be a backup currency.
otherwise start CGS donation? that is incredible.