0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I mean that if someone was willing to honor a 1 to 1 exchange rate between BTC and UserBTC and the market trusted them, then the internal market would allow people to trade BTSX vs UserBTC without having to go through a centralized exchange.
Anything that spreads BitShares' tentacles into different areas is a way to show it off and possibly attract more people. I can see that benefit here, which you have described well, fuz. But I would weigh that carefully with the danger of encouraging people to spend more time in another ecosystem. Time and energy spent there might better be spent in building BitShares itself. Weigh those considerations and perhaps one comes out as being more important.
I think you guys may be missing something important:Yes, we can have the same functionality on BTSX, however having real decentralized gateway to other currencies strengthens the ecosystem, and will provide more liquidity and stability to the prediction market.
Why trade on NHZ when you can do the same kind of trading with user issued assets on BTSX? Perhaps you should also offer escrow for BTC for your own BTC asset on BTSX?
yay! I think I was just part of the very first real BTSX transaction on an exchange. (Unless I'm reading the history wrong)
Now you read the next FAQ - how to add assets to the AE...
Quote from: krabbypatty on July 20, 2014, 08:29:56 pmNow my account ID disappeared and says to send a message to protect the account. Oh my... A bunch of cryptic messages.I sent you a message, so that warning disappeared, however my account ID is still gone.You are pretty unlucky with your ID/accounts/tx these days.
Now my account ID disappeared and says to send a message to protect the account. Oh my... A bunch of cryptic messages.I sent you a message, so that warning disappeared, however my account ID is still gone.
Quote from: pharesim on July 20, 2014, 08:25:06 pmI like the idea, and when I have spare time I could work on it. But my to-do-list is awefully long, that's why I offer a bounty for creating it.Until then: when you're logged in there's a question mark in the top right corner which contains a link to the detailed NXT AE tutorial.I deposited 1K BTSX, now what?
I like the idea, and when I have spare time I could work on it. But my to-do-list is awefully long, that's why I offer a bounty for creating it.Until then: when you're logged in there's a question mark in the top right corner which contains a link to the detailed NXT AE tutorial.
Will do that too, but not today. Was working on this nearly 24 hours straight now. Someone interested in a bounty? Check the FAQ (top left corner of the site) to clear the basics up.You need to get some NHZ from the faucet to deposit. The reason for that is that you can't sell or even withdraw the assets if you don't have NHZ.
Quote from: Akado on July 14, 2014, 12:34:54 amI understand more options are good, but if someone has pts, btsx, etc, why should that person trade it on other exchange other than XT? I mean, by trading there, you're actually supporting the bitshares community and helping it grow so..For the same reason(s) they trade it on bter
I understand more options are good, but if someone has pts, btsx, etc, why should that person trade it on other exchange other than XT? I mean, by trading there, you're actually supporting the bitshares community and helping it grow so..
Quote from: pharesim on July 20, 2014, 07:49:28 pmAdded BTSXSo is it possible to see trade history / order books here at all?
Added BTSX
QuoteEspecially now that it looks like Invictus will not have any involvement with Bitshares X (the DAC will be launched by an independent group)so is this statement false?
Especially now that it looks like Invictus will not have any involvement with Bitshares X (the DAC will be launched by an independent group)
QuoteLove it. Especially now that it looks like Invictus will not have any involvement with Bitshares X (the DAC will be launched by an independent group). For legal reasons, I was worried before about using AGS this way, but now I'm all for making it liquid to trade on there.I must have missed that. What do you mean I3 will not be involved in Bitshares X? No more Bytemaster behind Bitshares X? Who is going to further develop the product? Why are you in favor of making AGS liquid?
Love it. Especially now that it looks like Invictus will not have any involvement with Bitshares X (the DAC will be launched by an independent group). For legal reasons, I was worried before about using AGS this way, but now I'm all for making it liquid to trade on there.
Quote from: pharesim on July 09, 2014, 09:34:59 pmYou could even make AGS liquid that way! It would be possible to issue AGS asset on BTS X and allocate them to addresses of current AGS donors, so not only XTS are "imported" with donor address private key, but also all the AGS. What do you all think, should we make AGS liquid?
You could even make AGS liquid that way!
I don't see why, with all the good stuff on the way here, we would want to move any of it to an NXT-type blockchain? Bitshares is far better already.
I've already suggested we make AGS liquid that way. But it's important to note that it won't be a BitAsset, rather just an asset.
Quote from: toast on July 09, 2014, 09:26:04 pmI mean it is possible to create an asset called "PTS" and then distribute it exactly as PTS holders are distributed at a particular time and then declare "These are the real PTS! dump your old PTS!" but that is not a good ideaYou could even make AGS liquid that way! No, seriously, we know that there are other ways to trade PTS (maybe even on BTS X, using a gateway like we do).And for the moment our offer is of limited use, a PTS will cost about 20k NHZ and you can't get rid of those at a reasonable price if you have more than that. The market volume of NHZ isn't high enough yet to cash out.As soon as we add LTS you'll have a convenient way to exchange PTS to LTS, and it will become more and more practical the more DACs you can exchange against each other.Nobody is forced to make use of it, but we want to offer the possibility. And we're still looking for someone to cooperate with the multisig wallets
I mean it is possible to create an asset called "PTS" and then distribute it exactly as PTS holders are distributed at a particular time and then declare "These are the real PTS! dump your old PTS!" but that is not a good idea
Quote from: bitbro on July 09, 2014, 09:23:49 pmQuote from: toast on July 09, 2014, 09:19:36 pmIt's not... Maybe bitbro means it is possible to have a bitasset that tracks pts?See xerocs comment aboveSent from my iPhone using Tapatalkok.."It's not... Maybe xeroc means it is possible to have a bitasset that tracks pts?"
Quote from: toast on July 09, 2014, 09:19:36 pmIt's not... Maybe bitbro means it is possible to have a bitasset that tracks pts?See xerocs comment aboveSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not... Maybe bitbro means it is possible to have a bitasset that tracks pts?
They keep important announcement/changes like this secret. So, I will bet it is true.
Hug? Pts is not a DACFurther we can trade pts on the bitsharesx chain ... so why use NHZ?