61
Peerplays / Re: Security best practices for claiming BTS sharedrop in Peerplays?
« on: June 09, 2017, 03:59:09 pm »
I believe you have to add a new (2nd) key, then you'll be able to delete the original one.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
General Discussion / Re: Shorting BTS on the BTS exchange
« on: June 09, 2017, 03:57:46 pm »
Niice.
63
General Discussion / Re: Wallet feature request
« on: May 24, 2017, 01:19:04 am »Hi, probably the best start would be to file an issue in https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues
Please do file the issue!
64
General Discussion / Re: Dan's Next Project - EOS Rears its Head
« on: May 23, 2017, 02:20:17 am »That doesn't really address any of permie's concerns (concerns that I also share), though. I'd like to believe Dan is willing to look out for the best interests of all his creations, but...I have my doubts at this point.
Just like he looked out for the best interest of Bitshares' bitUSD by creating Steem Dollars?
He is so ashamed of himself that he won't even come here. I think that answers your question...
Stan championing the previous Bitshares merger is also quite funny. So when will BTS Vote and BTS DNS be active on the BTS 2.0 chain Stan?
Do you really think the BTS community is going to fall for the bait and switch a second time?
I really wanted BTS Vote... and DNS. And Dan's 'undivided attention'.
65
General Discussion / Re: Idea: London Property Market Smartcoin. Market Research,Implementation Hypothesi
« on: April 27, 2017, 03:12:51 am »
Interesting,
I'm amazed that Bitshares doesn't have bitETH or bitPLATINUM or bitLTC. So many basics missing!
I'm amazed that Bitshares doesn't have bitETH or bitPLATINUM or bitLTC. So many basics missing!
66
General Discussion / Re: [POLL]change force settlement parameters for all fiat pegged smartcoins?
« on: April 11, 2017, 06:57:58 pm »Very good, Bitcrab. Thanks for bringing this up. I support the proposal. Consistency across all smartcoins will make the entire platform easier to understand for newcomers.
Agreed. Similar bitassets should have the same rules.
But doesn't consistency across all smart coins include bitOIL, bitSILVER etc. - and all fiats treated equally.
Bitshares needs to be bitAsset agnostic.
67
General Discussion / Re: Adjusting how bitshares fees get distributed.
« on: April 11, 2017, 05:51:22 pm »
Let Ronny have his input.
The way I see it, the referral system is absolutely wonderful and should not be undermined. The idea that 50% going to the network rather than 20% meaning a larger network take in absolute terms is spurious. If that juicy 80% entices more of us to recruit new users, then the network's 20% will be be a bigger number; a relatively small slice of an immense pie is more pie than half a nano pie.
Some sleazy businesses like Plus500 spend hundreds of dollars for each new user they recruit. If Ronny or I are going to spend $500 to recruit 10 new bitshares users, we'll both want to be personally remunerated for that private marketing spend, as a prerequisite for having that marketing budget in the first place.
If people want to pay yield to bitAssets, and the reserve pool is heaving with spare BTS, then you could simply pay the yield using that, for as long as it lasts. Of course, that would then drive fear of holding BTS. However, I do wonder if this billion BTS in reserve might be too large a number in itself to give much confidence to BTS longs.
The way I see it, the referral system is absolutely wonderful and should not be undermined. The idea that 50% going to the network rather than 20% meaning a larger network take in absolute terms is spurious. If that juicy 80% entices more of us to recruit new users, then the network's 20% will be be a bigger number; a relatively small slice of an immense pie is more pie than half a nano pie.
Some sleazy businesses like Plus500 spend hundreds of dollars for each new user they recruit. If Ronny or I are going to spend $500 to recruit 10 new bitshares users, we'll both want to be personally remunerated for that private marketing spend, as a prerequisite for having that marketing budget in the first place.
If people want to pay yield to bitAssets, and the reserve pool is heaving with spare BTS, then you could simply pay the yield using that, for as long as it lasts. Of course, that would then drive fear of holding BTS. However, I do wonder if this billion BTS in reserve might be too large a number in itself to give much confidence to BTS longs.
68
General Discussion / Re: btsbots wallet release v0.0.1
« on: April 11, 2017, 05:39:38 pm »
Desperately trying to join the liquidity party.
I've been trying to install the BTS Bots Android app via PlayStore on an old Samsung. I'm getting error -103, which apparently can be fixed according to what i've gleaned on stackoverflow.
I've been trying to install the BTS Bots Android app via PlayStore on an old Samsung. I'm getting error -103, which apparently can be fixed according to what i've gleaned on stackoverflow.
69
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: March 20, 2017, 12:38:06 am »Nice! Too bad I just sold 75% of my stake 5 days ago. Mainly due to lack of any clear direction and leadership, but also because the DEX can not trade other major coins without the same risk as centralized exchanges.Stan's buying again!! 2.25 million more shares just yesterday. (Side note: can't wait for Stealth, when all this activity can be completely private.)
With Stan buying, Stealth coming soon, the awesome power of the 3,300 TX/S stress test, and the recent rumblings around Dan's STEEM departure...I'm feeling pretty damn bullish right about now.
It's gonna be a good summer lads.
If we fix that then I am all in again.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
There's almost zero counterparty risk with trading bitAssets.
70
Technical Support / Re: !!! Stupid Questions Thread !!!
« on: February 25, 2017, 03:38:35 am »I have a stupid question...
I opened up a 2nd bitshares account, now I can't get back into the first. Is there a way to 'log out' or combine accounts?
Cryptocurrency is fiddly.
I presume you're using OpenLedger.info, rather than the client download from bitshares.org etc.?
71
General Discussion / Re: how about to raise block reward?
« on: February 25, 2017, 03:31:44 am »
My delegate is in embryo. But she's a beaut.
72
General Discussion / Re: Poor Man's Patent
« on: February 25, 2017, 03:29:55 am »
I wouldn't mind competing with Blocksign, or otherwise compelling them to apply their methodology to the Bitshares blockchain.
73
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: February 25, 2017, 03:26:53 am »
Jonny'N'Stan know what's up; real world value.
When Bitshares hits 90 SAT, I'ma be a multi-fafillionaire. Finally.
When Bitshares hits 90 SAT, I'ma be a multi-fafillionaire. Finally.
74
General Discussion / Re: [Contest] RSVP for the BitShares Liquidity Contest - March 4th 2017
« on: February 18, 2017, 12:38:25 am »
I'd like to play a game.
75
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Project administration & essential maintenance
« on: December 13, 2016, 01:48:17 am »
Glad to have Vikram back. 
