0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: nethyb on September 06, 2015, 04:48:50 amI for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.htmlIf we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...This is cool! Yes, for those who wish to contribute $$$ instead of time, please do so. We can fund this (both in $$$ and effort/time) and achieve a massive blast (near 100K TPS hopefully) via multiple nodes in LAN and then over the Internet. Donors and volunteers, please SAY I.
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.htmlIf we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
Quote from: jabbajabbaつ◕_◕つ on September 07, 2015, 07:33:57 pmQuote from: kenCode on September 07, 2015, 07:10:22 pm@nethyb @kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test. Anybody else?any estimation on how much it would cost in the end?Based on nethyb's post of $1.68/hr that would be (at current rates) 362 BTS for each hour, not including time and labor...I'm willing to chip in min 2500 BTS
Quote from: kenCode on September 07, 2015, 07:10:22 pm@nethyb @kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test. Anybody else?any estimation on how much it would cost in the end?
@nethyb @kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test. Anybody else?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3jvo9k/bitshares_says_it_will_be_able_to_complete_100000/?sort=confidenceToast is out there all alone, to the rescue! On a more serious note, this is to be expected..Ethereum is very interesting and I like the project but I tend to see the community turning into the next moneros and nxt fanboys.
Quote from: cube on September 06, 2015, 03:21:56 amI think this is a nice idea being slowly developed! LAN test We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.How about that, guys? If you are keen, please SAY IT!Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 amQuote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 amQuote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.htmlIf we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed! LAN test We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.How about that, guys? If you are keen, please SAY IT!Quote from: Stan on September 06, 2015, 02:30:08 amQuote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 amQuote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?
Quote from: phillyguy on September 06, 2015, 01:48:00 amQuote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Someone want to take a shot at it?
Quote from: Akado on September 06, 2015, 12:48:51 amQuote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have Agreed!!
Quote from: kenCode on September 05, 2015, 08:25:28 amQuote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have
Quote from: sudo on September 05, 2015, 05:42:01 amQuote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Quote from: cube on September 05, 2015, 04:46:42 amA trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed. good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. Quote from: Akado on September 04, 2015, 10:24:23 pmQuote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projectsYea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.
Quote from: bytemaster on September 04, 2015, 10:16:45 pmLoad testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections. I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3jvo9k/bitshares_says_it_will_be_able_to_complete_100000/?sort=confidence
Any estimation of when we will be able to import our BTS balances to the new chain? Will it be after the countdown begins or only after the 30 days, when the fork happens?