0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: onceuponatime on May 19, 2016, 03:11:22 am@xeroc, do you?I totally do!Though I have some critiques on it:* If you focus on OpenLedger, then Openledger should pay you.* I would love to see (already in the very beginning) an explanation video that distinguishes BitShares from OpenLedger/FreedomLedger/MakerX(and whatever comes next). This is where we TOTALLY failed. People believe BitShares is owned bit OpenLedger.* Then I would like to see more walk-throughs and don't think we need all the tech lectures just yet. Tell people how to do things, then tell people how it works later on. There is documentation (in text form) for this already, so I don't think we needs this just yet.Go for it!
@xeroc, do you?
The worker term is now complete.Due to voting fluctuations, we collected a little under one month's pay during the worker period. With that funding, we produced the following videos:Intro to Bitshares, where we take a brief overview of some of the key features that make Bitshares stand out from other blockchain technologies.Buying Bitshares the Easy Way, where we quickly demonstrate one of the easiest way to buy Bitshares: using a bridge inside the online wallet.Bitshares Inflation Rate, where we take an in-depth look at the inflation rate, or change in the supply, of the core Bitshares token.This level of productivity is in line with the commitment put forward in the original proposal, making this worker a success.Due to the positive feedback we've received from the community, we will consider a second term in order to continue to produce these educational and valuable videos. If you have any feedback, please let me know. I will put forward a proposal for a second term shortly.Thank you in advance for your comments and suggestions.
Quote from: tehdos on September 07, 2016, 07:54:59 amI want to see some committee members actually make pages and show me what their voting for. Until then I'm doing my own vote.you are probably asking PROXIES to do that .. and not committee-members .. are you? The committee doesn't vote on workers. If a member (like myself) is also a proxy, then they might have a forum thread to keep people updated (like me: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20792.new.html#new)As for chronos' worker, I'd like to see more videos and will vote for another worker.
I want to see some committee members actually make pages and show me what their voting for. Until then I'm doing my own vote.
Update: as you've probably already seen, the next video has been launched, Buying Bitshares the Easy Way. Video production is again temporarily on hold, as the worker is just under the threshold from being funded, at the time of this writing.Open to any feedback. Thanks for your support!
Quote from: Chronos on July 19, 2016, 04:07:04 pmQuote from: dannotestein on July 18, 2016, 03:36:36 pmWe're getting a lot of emails about how to use the new deposit/withdrawal pages, especially from new Steem users. All the current videos for this process are out of date I think, because of changes to the UI. Any chance you could get out a quick video on this subject?That's exactly what's planned for this week! However, the worker just fell off the payroll again. Bitcoin volatility has nothing on BTS worker volatility! Fortunately, the proxy account that @bytemaster controls is enough to bring it solidly back into the green. Would you like to contact him and see if he'd like to support this work?Thanks!Finish it up this week anyways, and I'll make up the difference in Steem or bitshares, your preference.I think we have an awesome opportunity to attract new Steem users to bitshares right now, and I don't want to waste the opportunity because of being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Quote from: dannotestein on July 18, 2016, 03:36:36 pmWe're getting a lot of emails about how to use the new deposit/withdrawal pages, especially from new Steem users. All the current videos for this process are out of date I think, because of changes to the UI. Any chance you could get out a quick video on this subject?That's exactly what's planned for this week! However, the worker just fell off the payroll again. Bitcoin volatility has nothing on BTS worker volatility! Fortunately, the proxy account that @bytemaster controls is enough to bring it solidly back into the green. Would you like to contact him and see if he'd like to support this work?Thanks!
We're getting a lot of emails about how to use the new deposit/withdrawal pages, especially from new Steem users. All the current videos for this process are out of date I think, because of changes to the UI. Any chance you could get out a quick video on this subject?
Update: the worker has been voted back in. You can expect the next video, Buying Bitshares the Easy Way, to be published this week.Thank you for your support!
Quote from: btswildpig on June 26, 2016, 06:01:03 amQuote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 01:27:38 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:50:12 amQuote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 12:34:15 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 amBitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .How did you arrive at this conclusion?What about if we learn from Dash?Follow in Ronny Boesing and Kencode ,waiting bull market。 Dash XEM ETH 's community structureare is different from BTS ,because some rules change we lost the banker's trust 。In the encrypted currency community ,why Bitshares was considered a liar?Now BTS is in 18 in http://coinmarketcap.com/ .If more workers or BM back ,BTS will be in 30 .We need all kinds of app ,such Ronny Boesing and Kencode's work .The apps are self financing.Then the Bitshares ecosystem will be healthy.That isn't the impression I am getting from new people who come to Bitshares. Take a look at someone who was introduced to Bitshares through Peerplays and how they reacted to what they saw here:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462351.msg15327352#msg15327352Overall, it was the lack of any visible work on the blockchain that made them exit. If you look further down the thread, Dan explained the various things going on trying to counter what they saw as a blockchain without a dev team anymore.If you look at the way things have happened, it is also easy to say, that since BM has left, and it has become clear to most that getting more work done on bitshares won't happen because of lack of voter support, that is why we have fallen down in our market cap... people have left the project because they seen no hope of it being able to grow as a result. <<< This could also be a similar conclusion. Which one is right?our marketcap has not fallen down more than when workers and delegates were in play . it's other coins (like STEEM) that has risen with it's weird scheme . in fact , i just brought several million BTS more , the same BTS that you deem "can not rise in marketcap without workers" . so i guess time will tell who's right after all .Great you are buying BTS! I just was giving a real world example of what happened when a newcomer came to Bitshares and what they saw in contrast to internal ideas from existing members/supporters. Hasn't it always been an ongoing issue here where we just didn't listen to what the market was telling us? Here is your prospective investor telling you what he saw and how it lead him to want to leave... like not even wait and see.. LEAVE.
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 01:27:38 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:50:12 amQuote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 12:34:15 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 amBitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .How did you arrive at this conclusion?What about if we learn from Dash?Follow in Ronny Boesing and Kencode ,waiting bull market。 Dash XEM ETH 's community structureare is different from BTS ,because some rules change we lost the banker's trust 。In the encrypted currency community ,why Bitshares was considered a liar?Now BTS is in 18 in http://coinmarketcap.com/ .If more workers or BM back ,BTS will be in 30 .We need all kinds of app ,such Ronny Boesing and Kencode's work .The apps are self financing.Then the Bitshares ecosystem will be healthy.That isn't the impression I am getting from new people who come to Bitshares. Take a look at someone who was introduced to Bitshares through Peerplays and how they reacted to what they saw here:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462351.msg15327352#msg15327352Overall, it was the lack of any visible work on the blockchain that made them exit. If you look further down the thread, Dan explained the various things going on trying to counter what they saw as a blockchain without a dev team anymore.If you look at the way things have happened, it is also easy to say, that since BM has left, and it has become clear to most that getting more work done on bitshares won't happen because of lack of voter support, that is why we have fallen down in our market cap... people have left the project because they seen no hope of it being able to grow as a result. <<< This could also be a similar conclusion. Which one is right?our marketcap has not fallen down more than when workers and delegates were in play . it's other coins (like STEEM) that has risen with it's weird scheme . in fact , i just brought several million BTS more , the same BTS that you deem "can not rise in marketcap without workers" . so i guess time will tell who's right after all .
Quote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:50:12 amQuote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 12:34:15 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 amBitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .How did you arrive at this conclusion?What about if we learn from Dash?Follow in Ronny Boesing and Kencode ,waiting bull market。 Dash XEM ETH 's community structureare is different from BTS ,because some rules change we lost the banker's trust 。In the encrypted currency community ,why Bitshares was considered a liar?Now BTS is in 18 in http://coinmarketcap.com/ .If more workers or BM back ,BTS will be in 30 .We need all kinds of app ,such Ronny Boesing and Kencode's work .The apps are self financing.Then the Bitshares ecosystem will be healthy.That isn't the impression I am getting from new people who come to Bitshares. Take a look at someone who was introduced to Bitshares through Peerplays and how they reacted to what they saw here:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462351.msg15327352#msg15327352Overall, it was the lack of any visible work on the blockchain that made them exit. If you look further down the thread, Dan explained the various things going on trying to counter what they saw as a blockchain without a dev team anymore.If you look at the way things have happened, it is also easy to say, that since BM has left, and it has become clear to most that getting more work done on bitshares won't happen because of lack of voter support, that is why we have fallen down in our market cap... people have left the project because they seen no hope of it being able to grow as a result. <<< This could also be a similar conclusion. Which one is right?
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on June 25, 2016, 12:34:15 amQuote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 amBitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .How did you arrive at this conclusion?What about if we learn from Dash?Follow in Ronny Boesing and Kencode ,waiting bull market。 Dash XEM ETH 's community structureare is different from BTS ,because some rules change we lost the banker's trust 。In the encrypted currency community ,why Bitshares was considered a liar?Now BTS is in 18 in http://coinmarketcap.com/ .If more workers or BM back ,BTS will be in 30 .We need all kinds of app ,such Ronny Boesing and Kencode's work .The apps are self financing.Then the Bitshares ecosystem will be healthy.
Quote from: ebit on June 25, 2016, 12:29:00 amBitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .How did you arrive at this conclusion?What about if we learn from Dash?
Bitshares performance is too poor, must be cut off all workers.When the BTS is 0.0001btc ,we can vote more workers in .We need learn from peercoin nxt litecoin .
i didn't need a video to use paypal. maybe that's the problem . it's not the issue with the video , it's the fact that we even need them in the first place.
Quote from: dannotestein on June 22, 2016, 05:23:58 pmObviously there's disagreement on the value of these videos, but I think for the price we're paying they are a reasonable deal. We really need more of this type of video material, not necessarily to attract new users, but just to educate them once they are here. There's a substantial group of people that are much more likely to watch a few videos than will scavenge thru a forum or post a bunch of questions (that we'll then be forced to answer over and over again). As it stands now, I'm sure we lose a bunch of these new users due to difficulties of learning the platform, and that's an expensive loss.On a related-note, I'd like to encourage everyone to do a search on youtube and "watch" any decent video on bitshares they can find there. The reason is simple: views are a relative measure of the popularity of a video (and the topic it covers). The more views they get, the more likely other people are to watch the video, since people are more likely to watch something that's popular. It's just human nature.i didn't need a video to use paypal. maybe that's the problem . it's not the issue with the video , it's the fact that we even need them in the first place.
Obviously there's disagreement on the value of these videos, but I think for the price we're paying they are a reasonable deal. We really need more of this type of video material, not necessarily to attract new users, but just to educate them once they are here. There's a substantial group of people that are much more likely to watch a few videos than will scavenge thru a forum or post a bunch of questions (that we'll then be forced to answer over and over again). As it stands now, I'm sure we lose a bunch of these new users due to difficulties of learning the platform, and that's an expensive loss.On a related-note, I'd like to encourage everyone to do a search on youtube and "watch" any decent video on bitshares they can find there. The reason is simple: views are a relative measure of the popularity of a video (and the topic it covers). The more views they get, the more likely other people are to watch the video, since people are more likely to watch something that's popular. It's just human nature.
Note that if @bytemaster supported the worker with his 33 proxy followers, the worker would again be funded. Perhaps if you're able connect with him, he might wish to cast his vote and get this ball rolling again. I haven't been able to reach him recently on these forums.Thanks!
Quote from: Chronos on June 22, 2016, 02:44:51 pmA few thoughts:First, if you don't want to fund the worker for now, that's fine, and I'm not offended. I think it's clear what kind of product I'm offering, so it's up to the community to decide if they want to purchase it or not.I personally believe the worker provides great value for Bitshares, because the videos will last a long time, and the overall dilution effect is very low. Just think: any time in the future, we would have a professional video for when someone shows up and asks questions like, "How do I buy BTS?" or "How do I secure my wallet?"Lastly, no offense, but I wouldn't do this work for Steem dollars. I don't trust their value, which is probably the same reason you'd rather use them for payment. Thanks for the good conversation.Does this mean you will no longer pursue fulfilling or attempting to market your product that you are selling to the network? The good conversation ender sounded like you are just packing up and leaving.
A few thoughts:First, if you don't want to fund the worker for now, that's fine, and I'm not offended. I think it's clear what kind of product I'm offering, so it's up to the community to decide if they want to purchase it or not.I personally believe the worker provides great value for Bitshares, because the videos will last a long time, and the overall dilution effect is very low. Just think: any time in the future, we would have a professional video for when someone shows up and asks questions like, "How do I buy BTS?" or "How do I secure my wallet?"Lastly, no offense, but I wouldn't do this work for Steem dollars. I don't trust their value, which is probably the same reason you'd rather use them for payment. Thanks for the good conversation.
Quote from: lil_jay890 on June 21, 2016, 04:27:03 pmI think the problem is that Chronos still hasn't updated the video where he says "distributed proof of stake".The video is very good otherwise and I think its a great explainer. I disagree that it is boring. The videos should be added to the bitshares website. That would drive more traffic. Just because there are few views now doesn't mean it is a bad video. It just hasn't been promoted and utilized.Once again: I appreciate hard work (i know it is).From my outsider perspective it looks like a job for a buddy. I'm just saying what i think and how i feel about this. I'm sure many potential investors lurking this forum and some of them seeing this same as me. I think you're giving blockchain's money to easy. Things like this could be founded via steemit. It is boring... like a lesson... bla bla bla bla bla - most people hate to learn - they will not watch this.
I think the problem is that Chronos still hasn't updated the video where he says "distributed proof of stake".The video is very good otherwise and I think its a great explainer. I disagree that it is boring. The videos should be added to the bitshares website. That would drive more traffic. Just because there are few views now doesn't mean it is a bad video. It just hasn't been promoted and utilized.
Apreciate hard work, but i don't like it - it's boring and you have not many views. My proxy (xeroc) voted at you, so whatever, but i'm angry because this worker. I'm voting up everything bitshares related at steemit (even if i don't like it)Pay devs with skills
Quote from: Chronos on June 18, 2016, 04:12:34 amWell, that's a bit of a setback, eh? A large voter has stopped supporting the worker with his 21 proxy followers, and now the worker is sharply under the threshold to receive worker pay.Anyone have any ideas to get this jump-started again? I'll be able to put out one more video at the most with what remains of the pay. Let's not let this be the end.One trick would be to vote down the refund and burn workers, until they're below the Chronos worker. This wouldn't have any other side-effects with the current worker line-up (except for the bad taste of vote manipulation).This is why I think Workers should have term support. This kind of voter support volatility doesn't work well for you does it?I think the way around this is to have proposals that payout to a multi-sig and have a 3rd party escrow who verifies the delivery of services that requires both yours, his, and possibly a committee members signature to release the funds. It's important though that it is someone or a company that is reliable however. We have seen someone in the past attempt to do this only to have the other party just up and disappear. This might be solved by making the standard to be everyone be doxxable. It is unreasonable to expect anonymity when providing services in my estimation. Under these provisions I think once voted the contract will complete and cannot be reversed with downvotes.. and any unused bts will be refunded to the pool or burned.Thoughts?
Well, that's a bit of a setback, eh? A large voter has stopped supporting the worker with his 21 proxy followers, and now the worker is sharply under the threshold to receive worker pay.Anyone have any ideas to get this jump-started again? I'll be able to put out one more video at the most with what remains of the pay. Let's not let this be the end.One trick would be to vote down the refund and burn workers, until they're below the Chronos worker. This wouldn't have any other side-effects with the current worker line-up (except for the bad taste of vote manipulation).
Why in your video DPOS stands for "Distributed Proof of Stake"
Thank you all for your support. The first video has been released, highlighting some of the key features that make Bitshares stand out from other blockchain technologies.Watch it now: Intro to Bitshares
Quote from: xeroc on June 03, 2016, 07:51:38 amQuote from: EstefanTT on June 02, 2016, 11:52:12 pmIt's nice to see that the community has recognized the value of the worker and pushed it in the green zone ! Nicely done Chronos ! Sent from my SM-G900F using TapatalkIt seems the anti-dilution crowd has lost some significant support ..Well, that's an amazing news ! The very purpose of the reserve pool is allow us to move forward when needed, this chinese movment was scary ! BitShares need to keep evolving and keep its edge until we are recognize for our true value.It's gonna be an interesting summer with the videos of Chronos coming soon, all the projects of Kencode evolving fast, bunkerchainlabs related projects, maybe Altcap or Bit20 taking off and bringing some volume on the dex, ... and at the end of the summer, the end of the merger dilution.
Quote from: EstefanTT on June 02, 2016, 11:52:12 pmIt's nice to see that the community has recognized the value of the worker and pushed it in the green zone ! Nicely done Chronos ! Sent from my SM-G900F using TapatalkIt seems the anti-dilution crowd has lost some significant support ..
It's nice to see that the community has recognized the value of the worker and pushed it in the green zone ! Nicely done Chronos ! Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Good news. This worker was voted in, just in time for work to begin! Thank you so much for your support. See http://cryptofresh.com/workers.At the time of this writing, it is just 200k BTS over the threshold to be active. We still need your votes. Being hired and fired every other day could be bad for my blood pressure.
Quote from: abit on May 19, 2016, 12:01:14 pmOP: do you know the referral program which is built inside BitShares and how to use it? It can probably bring you more income if used in the videos.The referral program sounds good on paper, but after the fees were adjusted it has become pretty much worthless. The top two leading referrers have ~1,600 referred accounts between them and less than a few thousand bts vesting (referral income) each.
OP: do you know the referral program which is built inside BitShares and how to use it? It can probably bring you more income if used in the videos.
Quote from: xeroc on May 20, 2016, 06:20:08 amQuote from: cube on May 20, 2016, 02:04:18 amWhat can we do to bring some sense into LTM?Restrict more ops to require LTM ... like `create_asset`, `create_withdraw_permission` and stuffTweaking the fees is certainly a good way forward. However any fee that we increase would have consequences. Those who wishes to create asset may no longer find it worth while to do so or that they may find a competitor chain cheaper and make more $ense. IMHO, we do not want to go a similar path as the 20-US-cent-transfer-fee.We need to find a price point where we can bring in good revenue and attractive to LTM-buyers, and yet comfortable to our target market. ie the consumers are willing to pay.
Quote from: cube on May 20, 2016, 02:04:18 amWhat can we do to bring some sense into LTM?Restrict more ops to require LTM ... like `create_asset`, `create_withdraw_permission` and stuff
What can we do to bring some sense into LTM?
@xeroc interesting idea. I think since the worker proposal can be voted out at any time, and the payment will vest for 30 days, shareholders are already well protected.I've produced a video to introduce this worker proposal! Check it out: https://youtu.be/RYFmBVTJodY
Quote from: mint chocolate chip on May 20, 2016, 01:51:57 amWith the drastically reduced fees, there is really no point to upgrade!!! The way I look at it, saving 80% on what is almost a free trade amounts to minimal savings. Spending a bunch of your capital to upgrade to LTM just doesn't make a lot of sense anymore.That is the point.... now"All it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM." ..when it makes no sense to do so!
With the drastically reduced fees, there is really no point to upgrade!!! The way I look at it, saving 80% on what is almost a free trade amounts to minimal savings. Spending a bunch of your capital to upgrade to LTM just doesn't make a lot of sense anymore.
Quote from: xeroc on May 19, 2016, 01:30:49 pmQuote from: mint chocolate chip on May 19, 2016, 12:59:23 pmThe referral program sounds good on paper, but after the fees were adjusted it has become pretty much worthless. The top two leading referrers have ~1,600 referred accounts between them and less than a few thousand bts vesting (referral income) each. I disagree. All it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM. Once people see the value in LTM the referral program will be worth it.Quote from: Chronos on May 19, 2016, 02:46:52 pmQuote from: xeroc on May 19, 2016, 01:30:49 pmAll it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM.In other words, all it takes is to convince people of something that is currently unlikely: that being an LTM will be long-term profitable because of fee savings and referral fees. I'd agree that the referral system probably isn't compelling for most people right now, if they understand the fee structure.With the drastically reduced fees, there is really no point to upgrade!!! The way I look at it, saving 80% on what is almost a free trade amounts to minimal savings. Spending a bunch of your capital to upgrade to LTM just doesn't make a lot of sense anymore.
Quote from: mint chocolate chip on May 19, 2016, 12:59:23 pmThe referral program sounds good on paper, but after the fees were adjusted it has become pretty much worthless. The top two leading referrers have ~1,600 referred accounts between them and less than a few thousand bts vesting (referral income) each. I disagree. All it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM. Once people see the value in LTM the referral program will be worth it.
The referral program sounds good on paper, but after the fees were adjusted it has become pretty much worthless. The top two leading referrers have ~1,600 referred accounts between them and less than a few thousand bts vesting (referral income) each.
Quote from: xeroc on May 19, 2016, 01:30:49 pmAll it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM.In other words, all it takes is to convince people of something that is currently unlikely: that being an LTM will be long-term profitable because of fee savings and referral fees. I'd agree that the referral system probably isn't compelling for most people right now, if they understand the fee structure.
All it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM.
Quote from: dannotestein on May 19, 2016, 05:29:26 pmQuote from: Chronos on May 19, 2016, 02:46:52 pmQuote from: dannotestein on May 19, 2016, 03:01:00 amAssuming the community has the right to distribute the videos for promotional purposes, I/BlockTrades would vote for your worker.I'd prefer the videos stay on the Chronos Crypto channel, but any hotlinking or embedding would be fine. Is that the kind of distributing you had in mind?I don't mind normally using links, but my concern is that you or youtube could always remove those videos at any time. Would you be willing to give the community the source videos in the unlikely case they are no longer accessible via your youtube account for some reason?That's a valid concern. I'd be happy to make the .mp4 video files temporarily available to the community as a backup, provided that they are not posted or distributed outside the Chronos Crypto Youtube Channel (unless that channel becomes unavailable and I provide no reasonable equivalent alternative).
Quote from: Chronos on May 19, 2016, 02:46:52 pmQuote from: dannotestein on May 19, 2016, 03:01:00 amAssuming the community has the right to distribute the videos for promotional purposes, I/BlockTrades would vote for your worker.I'd prefer the videos stay on the Chronos Crypto channel, but any hotlinking or embedding would be fine. Is that the kind of distributing you had in mind?I don't mind normally using links, but my concern is that you or youtube could always remove those videos at any time. Would you be willing to give the community the source videos in the unlikely case they are no longer accessible via your youtube account for some reason?
Quote from: dannotestein on May 19, 2016, 03:01:00 amAssuming the community has the right to distribute the videos for promotional purposes, I/BlockTrades would vote for your worker.I'd prefer the videos stay on the Chronos Crypto channel, but any hotlinking or embedding would be fine. Is that the kind of distributing you had in mind?
Assuming the community has the right to distribute the videos for promotional purposes, I/BlockTrades would vote for your worker.
Quote from: dannotestein on May 19, 2016, 03:01:00 amAssuming the community has the right to distribute the videos for promotional purposes, I/BlockTrades would vote for your worker.I'd prefer the videos stay on the Chronos Crypto channel, but any hotlinking or embedding would be fine. Is that the kind of distributing you had in mind?Quote from: xeroc on May 19, 2016, 01:30:49 pmAll it takes it so convince people to upgrade to LTM.In other words, all it takes is to convince people of something that is currently unlikely: that being an LTM will be long-term profitable because of fee savings and referral fees. I'd agree that the referral system probably isn't compelling for most people right now, if they understand the fee structure.Good feedback. Keep it coming!
* If you focus on OpenLedger, then Openledger should pay you.
* I would love to see (already in the very beginning) an explanation video that distinguishes BitShares from OpenLedger/FreedomLedger/MakerX(and whatever comes next).
Great idea, I would definitely support this.
Videos need to be evergreen and need to focus on the value proposition Bitshares provides.