Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pap

Pages: [1]
1
BitShares PTS / Re: jhProtominer - CPU and collisions/min charts
« on: December 14, 2013, 05:33:04 pm »
Thanks for your two replies yvg1900!

I now much better understand the way things goes with your miner.
I've tried by myself and with your precious hints I've optimised not so bad my configuration.

Thank you!

Pap.

2
BitShares PTS / Re: jhProtominer - CPU and collisions/min charts
« on: December 13, 2013, 09:32:25 pm »
And a last question if I can  :)

Do you think there's a significant difference between 1024Mo/thread and 2048Mo/thread? And does more Mo/thread would be efficient?

Thank you so much in advance!

Once I'll reach my first PTS (psychological gap for me) I'll double the default time mining for you each hour.

Pap

3
BitShares PTS / Re: jhProtominer - CPU and collisions/min charts
« on: December 13, 2013, 09:25:31 pm »
Thank you for you quick response!

So for now is it better to stay with a single process with "-A -t 8" or regarding to your answer maybe 4 process with something like an equivalent to "-A -2" (using numactl or so) to optimize the 1 core/two threads design of the cpu?

Pap

4
BitShares PTS / Re: jhProtominer - CPU and collisions/min charts
« on: December 13, 2013, 08:09:31 pm »
Hi yvg1900,

I'm real newbie and maybe my questions already have been aswered, but I'd like to have your opinion about configuration.

First of all I'm using an Intel® Xeon® E3 1230 v2 (4 coeurs 8 threads @3.3 GHz)

In your finetuning.txt you're talking about the benefits of using separate process per thread using numactl on a Linux but in the same time the new version of jhprotominer (jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h-linux64-corei7avx.tgz) introduced the "-A" option to enforce cpu affinity.

For you, is it more efficient to run 1 jhprotominer's process using "-A -t 8" or 8 separate process stuck directly to one of the 8 threads?

Thanks in advance if you have the time to respond ands thanks a lot for you're great job!

Pap

Pages: [1]