Jumpstarting a dev fund like this is perfect way to attract more attention to the, hopefully, self sustaining chain.

With a large increase in the reserve pool, we could approve multiple worker proposals to fund multiple different developer funds, there's the committee dev fund account for example, otherwise private groups could do the same, for sure!

I think also with a larger reserve pool, we could also do a worker proposal for regularly airdropping onto active Bitshares users, without having to wait for the committee to build funds from bitasset earnings. Could be done against the holders of a pool share asset, or against ticket holders for example to directly improve network decentralization by distributing funds to the most active key stake holders.

Have you gained further insight into this issue?

How were you affected by the Telegram group bans?

Starting with the Telegram group bans.  It is obvious to many, IO Banker is a hinderance with the bitshares community.  This becomes a problem across platforms, as differing views and constructive criticism is what drives innovation.


On a more positive note,

Haven spoken to many people online/offline in regards how/why/when they utilize a blockchain has narrowed down one sticky point for sure.

Ease of use was the common denominator.

This leads back to why centralized exchanges such as coinbase and now the btc etf have gained massive volumes.  Many older users are simply hesitant to trust themselves with self custody, stating it was too difficult to manage.  People are comfortably with what they know, the banking and investment houses as we have today.  One user brought up how quickly people's mind will change if they faced banking capital controls such as were instituted in Greece awhile back.

Point blank, Bitshares needs a modern, simple, easy to use UI.  One app with the same interface across platforms would be a homerun.

Have you gained further insight into this issue?

How were you affected by the Telegram group bans?

https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/295

Seeking input on this draft BSIP on Github.

Worker proposals haven't been getting activated for years seemingly out of a fear that the reserve pool will run out.

The draft BSIP proposes to increase the maximum total supply (not the active liquid supply), so that worker proposals and witnesses can get properly paid for their hard work for years to come.

To those who would reject this idea, do you have sufficient Bitshares vote weight to reject a future BSIP vote on this matter?