91
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 创建资产的命令
« on: November 16, 2014, 03:27:10 am »alt你知不知道,发行资产后能分红吗?比如我发行一个基金,10000股,然后每个月想给每股分红10 btsx。目前可以实现吗?
这个问题,我在前几个星期的mumble hangout 里问过bm,他的意思是最好的方法是在内场挂单,用bitusd回购资产。
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
alt你知不知道,发行资产后能分红吗?比如我发行一个基金,10000股,然后每个月想给每股分红10 btsx。目前可以实现吗?
there is nothing to do with QQ agreement. the zhao's group is not open to public so it is private group which should respect ppl's privacy. and sfinder is not linked to that guy in qq group .obviously you are not a good liar.
please show the evidence from this forum. do not use "he says and she says "my question is if zhao150's qq group open for public or just for friendsis the QQ group a public place and everybody free to get in? I heard QQ group need apply to join。
stick to the point. answer my question: which sentense in the user agreement makes you think it that way?
either opening for public or just for the so called friends(as far as i know, the people in that group are not friends, you wanna in, you are in) won't change the fact that everything you say there is NOT privacy, especially when it comes to fud.
if you don't think so, point me to the sentense in the user agreement to correct me.
don't try to divert attention away by your ridiculous attemption to sueing xiaoshan.
we know words, we are not stupid, we are not sfinder's TA.
my question is if zhao150's qq group open for public or just for friendsis the QQ group a public place and everybody free to get in? I heard QQ group need apply to join。
stick to the point. answer my question: which sentense in the user agreement makes you think it that way?
is the QQ group a public place and everybody free to get in? I heard QQ group need apply to join。
hi shan, sorry for bugging you . just try to confirm with you if the QQ message is from private QQ group and not a public forum? i know in china ppl do not respect the privacy but in USA we do .
"Zhao150" told me the QQ message screenshot was from his private QQ group and you took it without his permission. I think we should respect ppl's privacy. can not post ppl's private message in the public. it is violated our US law. you may get sued
小山的建议有技术上实现的难度。还是不建议我不认为有什么技术上的难度。比如设定一个参考的支付率5%,超过这个比例的受托人,其工资形成通胀;小于或等于这个比例的受托人,其工资由手续费支出,不形成通胀,就跟目前BTSX的一样。
4. 关于通胀,你应该至少看到以下几点:
A. BTS X运行几个月以来,受托人的平均每块报酬约为1.5个BTSX,来自于手续费(转账、创建资产、注册账号、注册受托人)+ 爆仓BTSX的5%
B. 升级后,每个块最多产出50个BTS给受托人,但是,只有能让社区信服的开发者、市场推广者,才能以高支付率赢得选票(这将是他们的工资);其他的受托人只能设置低支付率,目前大多数人都觉得3%是合理的,也就是每个块1.5个BTS,跟目前大概一致.
C. 升级后,所有的手续费+ 爆仓BTSX的5% 将被直接销毁。
D. 一个简单的计算:
升级前:股份总量≈ 20亿—(手续费 + 爆仓BTSX的5%)*(100%--受托人平均支付率)
升级后:股份总量≈ 25亿 + 高支付率受托人收入 + 低支付率受托人收入- 手续费 – 爆仓BTS的5%
综上,第二条式子里,低支付率受托人收入 ≈≈(手续费 + 爆仓BTS的5%),也就是说,增发的部分主要来源于高支付率受托人。
假设升级后101个受托人里,有20个高支付率(100%)受托人,那么一年下来新增的股份数量≈ 6 块/分钟 * 60 分钟 * 24 小时 * 365 天 / 101 受托人 * 20 高支付率受托人* 50 bts/块 = 31223762 bts,那升级一年后,通胀率约为31223762 / 22.5 亿 ≈1.39 %;
最极端的情况下(101个受托人全部收取100%收入),通胀率约为7%。
小山版主已发帖呼吁低支付率受托人的收入继续直接从手续费中收取,只有高支付率受托人的收入形成通胀。这样更有利于推广,毕竟没人理睬你销毁了多少,只会盯着你增发了多少。https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=10867.0
开始接受推广是好事,但不仅是了解,还必须是达成才行,要不我说我可以,到时候不认那就问题来了。所以务必处理好,不知道楼主是bm的中国代理吗?务必处理好,我上次英文区就建议学校ripple的某些处理方式,就是必须有应用及出入口,能有保证才行,这对于以后受托人来说就必须达成节点任务,有应用出入口而且能可靠保证,否则永远都是在玩数字游戏,没有进步更不可能达成最初的理想。
另外本次强制了3%这个资费确实也不是往后的解决办法,必须有新办法,大家期望尽快集成更加合理的vote功能并达成。
The allocation may be unfair, however I don't really get why some big Chinese investors are ready to sell so low right now : don't they believe in future high prices for BTS ? Even if one feels robbed by the allocation, BTS still have the potential to go to the moon, and even more after the merge.