Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jsidhu

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 89
46
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 15, 2016, 07:02:11 am »
Rocket is fueled amd ready for liftoff on your command sirs.

47
General Discussion / Re: I just sold all my Bitshares!
« on: January 15, 2016, 06:24:20 am »
Its about to explode now any time heh.. Might make u kick urself

48
General Discussion / Re: Mt Gox > Cryptsy - Time for BTS?
« on: January 15, 2016, 06:23:16 am »
So.  They kept their bitcoin and litecoin wallets on the same server that they kept their lucky7coin?

Lol yes!  and presumably didn't chroot the coinds etc. I mean getting competent admins isn't cheap, but christ all mighty.

The fact that the wallets were on the same server is sketchy at best.  I mean..  it must have been the cold wallet too ?  BigVern is one sketchy mofo.
He prob planted the malware in the coin himself

49
General Discussion / Re: I just sold all my Bitshares!
« on: January 14, 2016, 04:20:36 pm »
Thanks

50
General Discussion / Re: Can private and public blockchains be connected?
« on: January 12, 2016, 04:32:27 am »
Yes, this exists and is possible. Crypti has private blockchains... each dApp uses its own blockchain. It also exists with merge-mined coins (namecoin, devcoin) and protocols built on top of Bitcoin (counterparty, mastercoin, rootstock). There are probably a lot of other examples that don't immediate come to mind.
How are merged mined chains private.?

I misunderstood the question haha... disregard my post.


I am not sure if it is possible. You may be able to encrypt the data stored in the merge mined coin's block chain and split the encryption key among numerous privately-controlled nodes (m of n style... in case one or a few are compromised).
They say doing public key encryption is not well tested especially while using the same curve (keys) for signing

51
General Discussion / Re: Can private and public blockchains be connected?
« on: January 11, 2016, 07:31:44 am »
Yes, this exists and is possible. Crypti has private blockchains... each dApp uses its own blockchain. It also exists with merge-mined coins (namecoin, devcoin) and protocols built on top of Bitcoin (counterparty, mastercoin, rootstock). There are probably a lot of other examples that don't immediate come to mind.
How are merged mined chains private.?

52
General Discussion / Re: open marketplace
« on: January 10, 2016, 06:15:15 am »
Im doing this,, with encrypted message that goes to seller
https://github.com/sidhujag/syscoin2/blob/rebranded0.12/src/offer.cpp

I will later write an ebay wrapper to import export from ebay

53
General Discussion / Re: Dogecoin cap is 2x of bts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: January 07, 2016, 06:42:05 pm »
bts gonna get passed by emercoin and monero.  but not factom because that thing will tank now i think.  (or maybe emercoin will stop rallying and finally tank too).

take alook at emercoins key value system which is a blatant copy past of namecoin 0.6.3 which is ancient and full of bugs... not sure what MSFT was thinking but I did a way better implementation of aliases (key value) and certificates which can be public key encrypt the value (data) and have unit tests for it running. The only thing emercoin has got is its dns server software and tying that into pay per clicks and things liket hat whcih is genuinly innovative i believe but the key value things it tries to build applications around is junk imo.

54
General Discussion / Re: Dogecoin cap is 2x of bts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: January 07, 2016, 06:44:26 am »
Kewl.. Another whale down.. Good for long term

55
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 06, 2016, 10:55:24 pm »
Cya.. You werent even settled in :)
For one that bought at 4600 sat what is one more margin call?

oh we've all purchased much higher than that... i've earned a bunch of bts from development when it was much higher.

56
General Discussion / Re: Why I like Ethereum [BLOG POST]
« on: January 06, 2016, 08:48:35 pm »

Quote
Anyone can create new smart contracts for BitShares today. There is ample

BM, i guess there is a typo in your blog "ample" ---> "sample"

[


quote author=bytemaster link=topic=20821.msg269014#msg269014 date=1451493763]
http://bytemaster.github.io/blog/2015/12/30/Why-I-like-Ethereum/
[/quote]

thats not a typo

57
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 06, 2016, 04:35:50 pm »
Cya.. You werent even settled in :)

58
General Discussion / Re: Why I like Ethereum [BLOG POST]
« on: January 05, 2016, 09:51:01 pm »
Can we get in contact with the guys from http://ciyam.org/ again?
@cass: IIRC, you have a contact

With workers and FBAs on the blockchain, we may be able to convince them to help us out

Last I believe I was close to convincing Ian Knowles to integrate AT into bitshares but he was on the fence about the project in the first place, although he is on the fence about just about everything... at that time ByteMaster never replied to my private message so I just assumed it was off the table for bitshares and I never really spoke to CIYAM since... I was integrating AT into bitcoin but that fell apart when me and Ian has philosophical differences than seemed to make him not want to work with me anymore so since then I tihnk they are working on their own platform which tries to enable developers from creating software through a manufacturing process (think templates) and blockchain is just a small part of it, although its ambitious im highly skeptical of its merits and usefulness anytime soon.

He made wild claims such as the BCNxt was non-existant and was actually ComeFromBeyond in disguise and that the whole NXT thing was built ontop of a scam, so he pulled out of it because initially he wsa to do ACCT on NXT(this i believe)... and that he would work with Vitalik but vitalik doesn't listen and does things the wrong way (this i don't believe), although when I asked vitalik he didn't even know who Ian was so go figure.

Essentially its a one-man team and a helper (vasilis does the grunt work based off of design) Vasilis is a good worker but Ian is the guy with the design although I kind of know it now too. Working in a team with Ian is asking for trouble as he wants to have things his way or no way.

Looking at this commit done 2 days ago https://github.com/ciyam/ciyam/commit/9d7f7753c67858f79cc007c39e50a97376a8b861
it seems possible to do ACCT through CLTV on the latest bitcoin core which integrated peter todd's OP

The guy is smart but not that smart, the real guy we should be going for is Tier Nolan who comes up with the idea of ACCT from which Ian used to build his c++ prototype. Tier also commented in the CLTV thread on bct and said it can be used to do ACCT through CLTV which Ian is trying to do now.

59
General Discussion / Re: Are there any blockchain based forums out there?
« on: January 05, 2016, 09:41:59 pm »
I am looking for help identifying any blockchain based forums or blogging platforms.

http://www.qora.org

http://qora.co.in

http://qora.co.in:9090/index/blog.html  <-- once logged into the Qora client you can view the decentralized microblogging platform and more at this link or the one provided within the client.

Latest chains : http://qora.co.in/?datafolder

A few of the CIYAM team help out with Qora. We've also contacted several of their C++ dev's about the recent inquiries here.

There is just vasilis who's good and Ian Knowles who is not so good (doesn't work well with others)

60
I would learn the codebase and document it for 3-4m
bts per month but i doubt any other senior developer would becausethey would look at chart first and extrapolate.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 89