BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => MemoryCoin => Topic started by: MaxPWR on January 13, 2014, 06:18:24 am
-
Our charity Horizontality.org has 25 wins, with little information disclosed in English concerning their operations:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2232.0
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2232.msg27063#msg27063
Most supporting addresses are only voting for that charity and no other officers. The only supporting addresses of that charity voting for officers are voting for emre & s4l1h.
http://mmcvotes.com/address/MVTEchagLNup4HJycBxbxWVXdiXaWLvbDu
I'm casting 9 votes to kill the coins until we get more information:
MVTEcha11111111111111111111116GDGs
I'll clear those votes as soon as we get more info from Horizontality and/or other charity candidates can re-campaign to take control.
-
Interesting move. I think we are seeing an effect where candidates so far haven't been competing directly against an incumbent . . . but when there is a vacancy we see a lot more campaigning for the position. So the model might be that someone has to be voted out before someone can be voted in. I'll add a second preference for the spoiler address - if you can get more votes that Peace Geeks, you'll add my second preferences.
-
Peace geeks and Horizontality.org both look good - let's just have the community get them to provide more info.
My personal choice is the BTC Oyate Project, but haven't had time to make contact. I think they're best aligned with the manifesto short-term, but haven't made contact / put together a campaign.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasperhamill/2013/12/19/native-american-activist-wants-to-swap-the-dollar-for-bitcoin/
-
Our charity Horizontality.org has 25 wins, with little information disclosed in English concerning their operations:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2232.0
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2232.msg27063#msg27063
Most supporting addresses are only voting for that charity and no other officers. The only supporting addresses of that charity voting for officers are voting for emre & s4l1h.
http://mmcvotes.com/address/MVTEchagLNup4HJycBxbxWVXdiXaWLvbDu
I'm casting 9 votes to kill the coins until we get more information:
MVTEcha11111111111111111111116GDGs
I'll clear those votes as soon as we get more info from Horizontality and/or other charity candidates can re-campaign to take control.
Well there is only 1 voter for Horizontality.org and that's SlyWax. You should rather PM him.
-
There is only 1 campaigner - Slywax. His threads are filling up with requests for more info, and I've PM'ed him just now.
There are 6 voters for the charity award - mostly split balances / etc that look suspicious.
If this was an MVTEcXo address, there'd be an uproar to get more info or get it back. Instead, no one cares? Isn't the charity award the one we should vet the most?
-
There is only 1 campaigner - Slywax. His threads are filling up with requests for more info, and I've PM'ed him just now.
There are 6 voters for the charity award - mostly split balances / etc that look suspicious.
If this was an MVTEcXo address, there'd be an uproar to get more info or get it back. Instead, no one cares? Isn't the charity award the one we should vet the most?
Don't say nobody cares. I was among the first who paniced.
SlyWax is a big shareholder of MMC and he is using his power to vote for his own ideas concerning the CHarity Award.
FT says he knows Sly from the Memorycoin 1 days and he is just a big shareholder.
MaxPWR, the least we need now is yet another CHA address to vote for. If you dont like Sly's approach, you might want to check the other proposals.
-
There is only 1 campaigner - Slywax. His threads are filling up with requests for more info, and I've PM'ed him just now.
There are 6 voters for the charity award - mostly split balances / etc that look suspicious.
If this was an MVTEcXo address, there'd be an uproar to get more info or get it back. Instead, no one cares? Isn't the charity award the one we should vet the most?
Don't say nobody cares. I was among the first who paniced.
SlyWax is a big shareholder of MMC and he is using his power to vote for his own ideas concerning the CHarity Award.
FT says he knows Sly from the Memorycoin 1 days and he is just a big shareholder.
MaxPWR, the least we need now is yet another CHA address to vote for. If you dont like Sly's approach, you might want to check the other proposals.
MaxPwr - I have to agree with don here.
We need 1 strong and reliable charity officer to accumulate the funds.
Splitting up votes to another cha address won't do any good in this situation other than strengthening the already strong ones.
-
Ok, if you guys know him, that's good enough for me.
-
No, none of us knows him.
He was around in MC1 days and freetrade remembers him from that time, but nobody knows what's happening to the cha grants currently.
Having another address to vote for is not a problem, as long as people use preferences.
So, everybody: make use of preferences when voting! If you want PeaceGeeks to receive the charity but they don't have a chance at the moment, vote for them with 1 Satoshi and choose another candidate you send 2 Satoshi to. Watch the election results to decide how to distribute your preferences.
-
I know some of you, and some of you know me,
as far as you can say that you know someone on a forum ...
For the info about the charity :
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2232.msg28029#msg28029