•Giving 5.5BTC+160PTS to super3 and check out what http://invictus.io looks like now
•Spent $14000+$7000+$1478=$22478 on the website development, and we are waiting for the version 6 of the bitshares.org. Why it ends up that BM doing all the job everytime? Are you planning to have version 60 of the website? And also using the PTS doing this kind of thing?

这两项是不是太不靠谱了
1. invictus.io 现在是个什么垃圾站了么？不要了就丢了 或者随便转发？
2. 2万刀的网站开发？是不是够去开发一个新的2代币了

不是很了解美国的开发费用，网站费用有这么高么？

1. I agree DPOS is necessary for PTS, why can't you just hard fork PTS and keep using the PTS name instead of PTS2? Leaving both PTS and PTS2 in the market is like leaving one of your child in the wild wide and die. Just announce a client hard fork and do the mapping. PTS miner will disappear and everyone upgrade their client.

2. Giving the rest PTS to marketing??? LOL. Let's look what the marketing team has done with AGS fund (below are what I found with a quick glance of the spending spreadsheet).
•They sell PTS in market value and pay the salary to Brian, Emily (who is she), and all things.
ref: From April 1st https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtRmp4NraeAydElLdUpwSERlY3luVkZNZnoxRm5md3c&usp=sharing#gid=0
At least I know that loyal miners won't sell that quick, does the I3 has the authority to sell the BTC and PTS into $?
•Giving 5.5BTC+160PTS to super3 and check out what http://invictus.io looks like now
•Spent $14000+$7000+$1478=$22478 on the website development, and we are waiting for the version 6 of the bitshares.org. Why it ends up that BM doing all the job everytime? Are you planning to have version 60 of the website? And also using the PTS doing this kind of thing?
•What kind of marketing are you doing in St. Martin Can I join the team?
ref: Line 141 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqTwk-e7yzJydG1USVlZS2U3Q1F4RTJrM19TQXFTWHc&usp=sharing#gid=0

To me, all of these spending is not clear. Look what mastercoin foundation is doing: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtCyUJvk_IyNdGpVcnpBN2tOczFmbVRnck5TWjZuRFE&usp=sharing#gid=0

After 5 months marketing, BTS still remain unknown to lots of BTCers. I3 need to think of the problem instead of taking every cent from community. PTS used to be the top 5 in marketcap at the end of last year and there were no marketing. After DPOS PTS, GIVE the remaining PTS to DEVELOPERS!!! Good product is the best marketing. And we really should change the AGS spending to bounty based instead of salary based (except developers). What I see is 5 core dev working really hard day and night, with another 20 ppl sucking AGS money for doing little thing.

大家看看第二条的开支

前期圈了那么多钱，大家可以算算，总数有多少刀了，难道还不够开发？？？开发人员都是请的业余的，能花多少钱？？？其实说白了，就是换着花样圈钱。200天快到期了吧，急了吧，又换个花样来了？？越来越感觉3I非常不靠谱，还好全抛了，万幸。
平时没事泡个茶端个小板凳，看你们演的这出戏结局到底是啥，还有那几个捧脚的，真心希望你们不是靠捧臭脚来忽悠小白做接盘侠。做人还是需要一点点良心的，呵呵

兄弟pts不换币就是要死了 块链维持不下去
其实就是pow转pos币  跟很多山寨被双花换币的节奏是一样的
但奇葩的是其他山寨换币，所有交易所都是直接终结旧币交易，1比1换币；而3i又突发奇想 留着旧币，说白了想靠旧币再套利么？
如果你留了旧币而不分配权益 留着他干嘛？直接换币不就好了  还说靠市场决定！

你这有点市场头脑和道德么？

一个简单的问题，用户买错了怎么办？还嫌不够乱么？你的所谓DAC开发到底怎么选？10%的利益到底怎么分配？

很难想象这样的头脑怎么去运作一个庞大的系统

Quote from: Webber on May 21, 2014, 01:58:21 pm

直接宣布pts作废就ok了 搞的这么麻烦  估计新人都不知道要买pts还是pts2 乱七八糟的

Quote from: heyD on May 21, 2014, 11:24:43 am

Quote from: Webber on May 21, 2014, 11:19:54 am

另外后续的DAC是分给pts 还是pts2?貌似公告里没说明这个问题呀，看3i的态度有可能是分给pts2???

我专门问了Stan, 回答是这样的:https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4648.msg58980#msg58980

以后PTS和PTS2会共存（PTS还有人挖矿的前提下），每个开发者自己决定是给PTS还是PTS2股份。

但SCSL还没有改，到时候具体怎么规定也不知道。我估计应该是至少10%给AGS，至少10%给PTS或PTS2，或者两者都给，PTS和PTS2合起来的股份不能少于10%

总之，会保留PTS这个选项的。

我的理解是3I不想用强权去宣告一个币死亡，事实上也不可能去强制扼杀一个P2P网络。他们认为让市场去决定才是一个正确的做法，如果官方和社区都只认可PTS2，那么PTS会自然死亡。

至于Stan说到时会卖掉PTS，我认为这只是一个姿态，表明官方要抛弃POW的坚决态度，而不是真的要卖掉。他又不是傻子，现在的市场都没法承受几十万PTS的抛盘，更别说Hard Fork之后了，这么做也会伤害到很多不知情的人。

换币下架 于己于人都是有利

留两个并存只是造成很多人误解

和交易所沟通好 做好换币工作

留个pow币 好再损别人么

但语焉不详引起的惊慌是对这个公司的又一次打击

1. 共存的无厘头
2. 共存就有利益分配问题 稀释持有者的利益；制造靠pts1敛财的机会

怎么又搞个pts2？

快照前拿着pts 快照后抛售了的这部分人怎么办？

按理解是又要造一个币出来 彻底不要脸了么

会有nas的抱怨3i拉底他们形象的，刚开始觉得你人气足，后来发现你没用，再后来就会反过来踩你一脚

bts没什么新闻了，搞搞副业也是可以理解！

已经非常不招人待见了 如此这般形象愈发惨淡