From an insider's point of view, the more shares are given to PTS, the better. From an outsider's point of view, having empty projects with no added value (CinniDev hasn't even tried to argue of what the added value of TimeBank could be...) just make us look silly.
Come on, we are in the adult business world, and it cannot work like that, we have to evaluate the value of things. Otherwise, we could also all join the dogeparty
Honorable Devs are honorable Devs whether or not their projects are taken seriously. Their projects, unfortunately, also have the same inherent flaws in the current altcoin market. So lets give CinniDev a chance to connect with the valid concerns our community has. It is the least we can do...
From an "outsiders" perspective, I can see where you are going, but a Dev who has access to the Developers of multiple high value bts-based chains is going to have a hard time producing something lacking significant value.
Also, it is important to note that sharedropping goes BOTH WAYS. It is entirely likely that the Devs who come from altcoin cryptos and honor AGS/PTS will also find themselves (and their shareholders) being honored later on by Devs working for Invictus. At the very least it increases the likelihood...
This is where most people get lost. They think of AGS/PTS as the only coins that can be "honored" for their contributions...If a Dev comes in here with a Killer App and sharedrops it on those who helped him/her make it possible, they could quite possibly put their "altcoin" and its holders in the exact same position as PTS/AGS holders with future chains.