Why are you running 6 delegates. A lot of voters would be turned off by such large number of delegates run by the same person from the same location.
Low market cap, low transactions, low liquidity, and low user adoption are even bigger turn offs I think.
Our Delegate bid hits on raising all that among other things. You are welcome to explore the why at
http://vote.bunkermining.com that is stated at the very beginning.
The need for 6 is was only driven by community support and the ow market cap reality of bitshares for what is required of this operation.
Voting for our delegates means a vote for higher market cap and raising BitShares standing in the crypto space overall.
I also think having delegates elected that don't even have servers operational is far worse, which was what this thread is about.
If the idea that someone operating 6 delegates who is building up bitshares and maintaining responsible delegate infrastructure for the network in contrast to that is somehow a turn-off in contrast to having delegates in the 101 that dont' even exist, then I can't argue that.
Keep in mind we already have someone (btsnow) with 4 delegates for a long time now, and Bitshares has survived.
Moonstone has had designs to get 5 Delegates elected as part of their crowdfund.
Our bid is quite different though.. everything we do flows back to BitShares and creates a buy/sell market pressure that is consistent day to day. We need to expand.. now.