Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - graffenwalder

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22
241
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Reinforcements required (reddit and bitcointalk)
« on: October 10, 2014, 09:38:19 pm »
Quote
So if you own 1% of all Notes, after a year of burned fees, you might now own 1.1% of the network’s worth.

This is a bit misleading, because dilution will still happen right?

242
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Note pre-sale is live!
« on: October 08, 2014, 04:12:37 pm »
Is it possible to see how many BTC have been donated today? Otherwise it is difficult to predict whether a donation makes sense today...

http://www1.agsexplorer.com
I should have said: ...how many BTC where donated today and the last days (history / chart)? The chart at the bottom is not up to date. I dont see an other chart. What can be done is multiply today's donated BTC by the number of days and compare to the total amount of donated BTC here https://blockchain.info/address/37X8DHpfiimB7PU5y35rfBcg5Vxj2R6umL This gives an overview how today's donations compare to an average day.

When opening the blockchain.info adress page its says:

Warning! this bitcoin address contains transactions which may be double spends. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to or from this address.

Don't know if there's a way to fix this

243
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Best MUSIC DAC launch model for 2014?
« on: September 29, 2014, 10:28:18 pm »
well i am against the IPO. But I understand the need to raise capital for development. So if you do make an IPO I would like this to be in bitusd. This would be a very good chance to show to everyone how each DAC support the other.

Why raise any bitcoins or PTS? You want capital? Get it via Bitusd and convert that to usd when needed...

The IPO is pointless. If they just pre-allocate 30% to themselves it's the exact same effect. Once the shares hit the exchange they can sell off some of it.

So the question is why did they originally offer 45/45/10 and now they want to do 35/35/30?

They are asking for more money without justifying why it's necessary other than because they can.

No it's not pointless. The IPO sets an initial market cap. In the 20% case a 1:5 ratio of course.
Also after the IPO an sell off wouldn't be needed.
The devs wouldn't have to wait for buy support to be build, only to wreck it by dumping for development costs.

244
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Best MUSIC DAC launch model for 2014?
« on: September 29, 2014, 10:06:54 pm »
well i am against the IPO. But I understand the need to raise capital for development. So if you do make an IPO I would like this to be in bitusd. This would be a very good chance to show to everyone how each DAC support the other.

Why raise any bitcoins or PTS? You want capital? Get it via Bitusd and convert that to usd when needed...

While this would be great, we shouldn't forget that we are still using test wallets, not a final product.
I think this would create a great barrier for new investors.

245
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Best MUSIC DAC launch model for 2014?
« on: September 29, 2014, 08:59:58 pm »
As I can see the AGS style will be best choise, as example:
- Allocate 35% to PTS, 35% to AGS, 30% to a pre-sale
- As AGS: accept only BTC and PTS
- PTS which you will have after pre-sale will bring you Notes and can be counted as Foundation part
- Make pre-sale for 30 days, each day as auction 0.5% for BTC, 0.5% for PTS

Before saying a potential yes to PTS donations. Please consider what this would do to the PTS price.

AGS style would mean snapshot of PTS when donation period is over.
We have seen PTS plummeting on days that relatively low BTC was donated.

Ergo such an announcement, would have a drastic effect on the current PTS price.

Also trolls would have fuel saying, that PTS was pumped on the initial proposal, just to be dumped after this.

246
General Discussion / Re: 0.4.16 - the good , the bad and the ugly
« on: September 21, 2014, 08:00:43 am »
What are these shortwalls?

Is it something temporary?

247
General Discussion / Re: BitShares X 0.4.15 Mandatoty Update
« on: September 14, 2014, 08:12:48 am »
After the reindex, at the log in screen it says:
There is a mandatory client update available at bitshares-x.info

Also my transaction history doesn't show.
Open orders do show.

248
General Discussion / Re: BitShares X 0.4.15 Mandatoty Update
« on: September 14, 2014, 07:41:35 am »
Windows version not working.

Msvcr120d.dll missing

Edit: x64 version works

249
General Discussion / Re: SuperNetworks
« on: September 11, 2014, 07:09:44 pm »
Supernet to me seems a scheme to boost the value of all cryptos that jl777 holds.

Yes it is. The interesting part will be when the ICO/IPO ends.
Because he will always have a buy wall up of 1% of the NAV at NAV (Net Asset Value).
I wonder if pumps will still work, because it's so obvious what the price should be.

Also all the assets that go in to the supernetwork are in a pump.
But once the ICO/IPO ends the pumps are over, which should result in a dump, and thus in a devaluation of the supernetwork.

250
General Discussion / Re: SuperNetworks
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:39:48 pm »

ICO = ?

(I'd google it, but the acronym has 50+ meanings)

Initial crowdfunding offering, same as IPO

There is a term and acronym for this already...

Initial crowdfunding offering =  ICO   ???

... and 'crowdfunding' is a word now, also...

Sorry it's initial crowd offering. This term is used a lot in equity crowdfunding.

251
General Discussion / Re: SuperNetworks
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:26:02 pm »

ICO = ?

(I'd google it, but the acronym has 50+ meanings)

Initial crowdfunding offering, same as IPO

252
General Discussion / Re: SuperNetworks
« on: September 11, 2014, 06:19:52 pm »

The interesting thing is I sit back and examine my own cognitive biases, being a Bitshares fanboy etc. 

Am I lacking in objectivity? 

Is this really as crazy as it seems ? 

I really trust your analyses TonyK, which are just as harsh on Bitshares products as anything else... but still..  I'm just like uhhhh what.  This must be why NXT price has started to grow significantly again.  Either that or maybe it is rebounding after sell off to diversify into Ether or BTSX ?

The reason NXT is on a pump, is that NXT and btcd get a 5% discount on the supernet ICO. Then they sell it on the TOKEN/BTC market for a quick profit.

Also the cheapest way in for non NXT and BTCD holders would be to sell BTC for one of these

Result NXT and BTCD pump. However most tokens sold on the BTC market are being sold below current ICO price.

His current selling point(what he's trying to achieve) is basically start a crypto hedge fund.
At all times he will set up a buy wall of 1% at NAV.

Also some of the funds are given to "super traders" wich are meant to bring extra value.

By all means I'm not trying to convince you guys to buy in to this ICO. The main downfall of supernet is that it's to centralized.


253
0.4.14 works like a charm.

Just covered a little bit, of my short. Didn't realize that this would result in getting some yield.

Great work thanks.

254
General Discussion / Re: BTSX 0.4.13 was just posted by DAC Sun
« on: September 10, 2014, 07:28:27 pm »
There is a hotfix update for web gui, please update by clicking "File| Check for updates" in BitShares X client.

Displayed a prompt to update  with the program running. Did this do the trick?
If 'Yes' pretty COOL!!!

 +5%

No it didn't

255
General Discussion / Re: BTSX 0.4.13 was just posted by DAC Sun
« on: September 10, 2014, 07:24:13 pm »
I'm trying to cover a part of my short order, not the full amount.

Getting this error:

Unspecified (0) invalid hex character 'T'

This issue is being fixed and a soft update will be made available shortly.

Just updated, now I get an error saying:

Unknown market order(20011) cannot find market order!

But I can still see it on my open orders list.

Running windows 7

To clarify, this change of error was after the recent soft update.

I just tried canceling an ASK and that worked fine.
But trying to cover the short results in: Unknown market order(20011) cannot find market order!

I don't know if it's relevant, but I made the short in 4.13 (before soft update)
And instead of Marging Call, It says market.order_type.margin_order in the GUI.




Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22