0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 amWas the Chamelon release delayed?The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 25, 2016, 01:30:33 amQuote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 amWas the Chamelon release delayed?The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.Awesome! is that maybe the reason why it took quite a few hours to receive my BTS on OpenLedger from Poloniex? Just wondering
Quote from: monsterer on February 23, 2016, 04:12:43 pmI know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...about
I know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...
Here is another customized version:
Quote from: mostar on February 21, 2016, 07:53:15 pmWhere can I learn more about the new api?Here's part of it, at least: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/blob/f7bfcea355b77cd07d0eee0963e8dea0935d3dbc/libraries/app/include/graphene/app/database_api.hpp#L365-L400
Where can I learn more about the new api?
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on February 19, 2016, 03:20:24 amQuote from: Brekyrself on February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 amIs there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...even general overview stuff would be coolI think I recall Ken mentioning Xeroc was working on those. Not sure though.
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 amIs there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...even general overview stuff would be cool
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 09:29:49 pmHere is a version with just the Coming message as some requested:Best one yet. The Bunker produces!
Here is a version with just the Coming message as some requested:
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 amQuote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 pmHave all the exchanges been notified?I just wrote- poloniex- bittrex- yunbi- ccedk- shapeshift- btc38We (metaexchange) already know about this, but we'd still appreciate being notified officially
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 pmHave all the exchanges been notified?I just wrote- poloniex- bittrex- yunbi- ccedk- shapeshift- btc38
Have all the exchanges been notified?
Quote from: Akado on February 18, 2016, 10:38:54 amChameleon is actually a cool name. I think this is the kind of little things that in the end can make the difference. They seem insignificant but can definitely have an impact. Yep remove '2.0.160216'
Chameleon is actually a cool name. I think this is the kind of little things that in the end can make the difference. They seem insignificant but can definitely have an impact.
Any chance someone could tweet it with this image embedded, and let me have a link or eveb tweet with @CCEDK_ mentioned, and I would lik to give it some twitter love
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 amQuote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 pmHave all the exchanges been notified?I just wrote- poloniex- bittrex- yunbi- ccedk- shapeshift- btc38Did you asked about confirmation from their site, that they received and read an email?
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 04:16:44 amQuote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 amThanks a lot for your help!First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy ModeI think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.I really like it!! Thank you!!!@JonnyBitcoin Can you get this image into the DailyDecrypt once or twice before Feb 23?
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 amThanks a lot for your help!First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy ModeI think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.
Thanks a lot for your help!First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy ModeI think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
The upcoming "Chameleon Release" of BitShares2.0 with Privacy Mode
Why cant we hype our releases with hip names? Ethereum calls their releases things like "Homestead" - ive no idea what it means but it sounds important. Ive even seen people on Polo chat about what Homestead will do to the price.We could have called this release Stealthy Salamander or something but we called it 2.0.160216
Quote from: bytemaster on February 16, 2016, 08:56:11 pmhttps://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases Windows binaries will be posted shortly.You should use here:https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,7067.0.html
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases Windows binaries will be posted shortly.