合并不合并是一回事。这种合并的方式就让人指责。就好像强奸犯对被强奸者说，我这么干是为了让你快乐，你又不会损失任何。

不要自我贬低，现在就是给你机会讨论：“是让你快乐？还是真的强奸了你？”的问题，并没有说“这是给你快乐呀！”。

被之前推广别的货币的人来指责BTSX社区会员，真是一种讽刺！！！

请不要带有偏见，社区是大家的，不是某个人的！

这不是短期获利亏赚的事，这是一种最基本的诚信问题。创始人连最近本的诚信都无法遵守，以后还有什么发展前途？为了赚钱现在连诚信都不要了，违背以前的成承诺。BTSX不只有bitusd，太过看重bitusd一定会失败。这次合并有很多可以讨论的地方，即使改了，一些人的利益受损，我想他们也可以承受的，但是如果没改，强制按一方自以为有利发展的意愿行事，那么人心就真散了。本来好好的一个社区，被BM这次提议搞得风风雨雨，实在令人感到惋惜。
我相信在这里反对的人不一定都是为了短期获利，既然有心来到了论坛，那么也有耐心，有长远的眼光等待DAC的成长。团结是好事，为了团结牺牲本来可以团结一部分人，那么就是蠢事。

说道诚信，我认为BM是诚信的典范，合并前与合并后的区别是，前者给你一个分散的产品，合并后给你一个打包的产品，性能还有所提高，并且遵守了PTS与AGS的10%股权承诺。并且是在前期已经分配50%BTSX基础上，增加性能后，又给PTS，以及AGS分配10%。至于有些在二级市场上追涨杀跌，被割韭菜带了的损失，怨不得BM。有些人只是趁机宣泄情绪，警惕别有用心者利用次机会，喊空在割你的小韭菜！

理性思考代替情绪宣泄，告诉你为什么要支持BM的决定！
      BM的决定是经过深思熟虑的，只是提出方式，加上语言隔阂导致了国人的误解。纵观中文社区的反应，可以将社区的观点分为如下几类：（1）3I死忠，脑残粉，无论3I出什么决定，都双手赞成。但对于为什么赞成，心里也没谱。（2）逢I3决议必反，先反对再说，美其名曰维护广大社区利益。甚至拿民族利益说事，还到英文社区指责谩骂。提不出任何建设性意见。这部分人甚至包括某些BTS大户。这种人自以为投了I3就是爷，颇有一番国内煤老板的风范。（3）I3的后来参与者。进入的晚，筹码代价高。强烈反对是理所当然的。（4）撇开自身利益，真正站在客观公正角度，理性思考者。。。。目前社区的气氛已经被第（2），第（3）类人的声音所控制，而第（1），第（4）类人的声音显得很微弱。这种局面已经影响到了社区以外，包括英文社区，交易所。使得BTS价格节节下降。
     我虽然加入I3的投资比较晚，错过了黄金的228快照，但是站在社区上述第（4）类人的角度对于本次BM的决策发表看法如下：（1）BTS生态系统处于萌芽期，决策的频繁变动是正常的，就像婴儿生长一样，生理变化肯定比成年人剧烈得多！（2）I3与广大投资者个根本利益是一致的，他成功了，我们也就成功了。（3）仅仅为了几个鸡毛蒜皮的得失，大哭大闹。甚至某些占了大便宜的人。为了满足私欲也歇斯底里，还有更可气的，明明已经是0成本了，也周武郑王地，长篇大论的分析所谓BM的决策弊端。这里我要替BM说一句公道话：“别以为你投了I3。你就是爷！” 
     进入正题：为什么我要支持BM：简单一个公式就够了，DAC（甲+乙+丙.......）=n*（DAC甲+DAC乙+DAC丙.......）。如果不合并，诸多DAC有些发展快，有些发展慢，有些甚至死掉。合并后发展快的DAC，带动发展慢的，只要有一个到两个DAC成功，整体就成功了。
 

Quote from: Stan on October 20, 2014, 01:37:20 am

We are long-time PTS holders ourselves.  Check out our public PTS donation holdings from AGS - Still held there to lay golden eggs for the future.

But consider this:  If BTS were to inherit that egg-laying capability from its AGS/PTS parents, then the ability to lay golden eggs would be yet ANOTHER contribution to the BTS value proposition.  All DACs that want to join the ecosystem but not the blockchain can still honor BTS and get the increasingly powerful community's enthusiastic support.

Just like bringing in any other merger to grow the value of all shares, adding AGS and PTS adds their value to BTS directly. 

Now you can own a profitable killer DAC AND have a position on the mailing list for targeting by third party DACs as well.

Why, this is a proverbial self-licking ice cream cone!

Stan, HI~
i saw the news in Bic38 that the allocation plan is that： BTS 80%   the rest 20%  PTS AGS DNS VOTE 7 7 3 3
I think the whole thing is a good idea, but the allocation part is not very good.
it is too good for the BTS and AGS holders, especially for those who donated big money to AGS before 2\28.

Thanks for the market, because it has proved my point: the BTS price has some increase, however, the PTS has fallen to shit,  DNS has decreased to the ground. if the allocation plan is everyone's vote result, i have nothing to say, but it is decided by just a few people in 3I team. is this fair？ the market said, no, it is really unfair to PTS and DNS holders.

i think it is more fair that PTS and DNS holders should be given more and i think even they are given more, the BTS and AGS holders still are more profitable.

so, please, change the allocation plan and make it more sensible.

in the past, PTS can have thrid party DAC and can be tradebale, and that is why it is usually more expensive than AGS.
now, AGS can also be tradeable, so AGS should not be equal with PTS, 

PTS should be given more, like  PTS: 9,  AGS: 5  (i think DNS 3  VOTE 3 is OK) .

The proposal:"  PTS: 9,  AGS: 5  (i think DNS 3  VOTE 3 is OK) "  is unfair for AGSers! PTSers and AGSers should be equal on shares!

Welcome! to our community. is there any plan in the future for the merger after argument? When will the plan be put up?   

还有 你的马币怎么样了？

I still trust my Ma-Coin hoping it will bring me a lot of fortrun