So, if anyone has one, i'm happy to comment in the future, white papers, nice diagrams, charts, whatever is ok for a marketing event, not for any serious development. I'm sure most will agree on this.
Since there are more users, and investors, using Bitshares than there are developers, there is always a wide divide of people who have opinions, suggestions, and complaints.
Right about now is when the appreciation of the teams Bytemaster use to lead developing Bitshares is missed.
It's like the system is on autopilot (development wise) and only now are people raising important questions about how the system works, where trust lies, how much trust is "too much trust" and now a recent discussion about NDA's among proxy witnesses has been raised.
This is all very long overdue, and I'm happy to see it.
There is a lot of interested money in this platform (always has been), so financing our future is going to be quite easy.
But when you say:
I seriously have to stop answering and stop talking completely. There is so much going on, and currently how it's being presented is just a talk, even from my side.
You are incorrect.
It's not "just a talk". It's a united level of understanding, that is really important going forward.
Deliver that as proposal even with a broken monkey in the box, and i'm sure that any serious businessman related to this network will push the proposal through.
I'd rather not see lots of proposals with a broken monkey in the box. That just leads to confusion, frustration, and can camouflage real decent proposals if they are hidden among all the other broken and non-possible proposals.
I hear your frustration, but removing talk in the favor of creating broken monkey in the box proposals is not a better solution.