How is child porn handled in a decentralized DNS world? How are terrorists handled? Hate groups?
I only ask this because these are the obvious touch points for why they talk about controlling the internet. So with the alternative.. how do we handle these things better? How does a decentralized DNS maintain the internet as a tool and not become weaponized?
Terrorists are the result of government oppression, eliminate the government interference and you eliminate the terrorism. Statistically speaking, you are more likely to die in a car accident than a terrorist attack.
Child porn is like money laundering, moving money isn't the crime, it is stealing it in the first place. In other words, stop kidnapping and child abuse which happen outside the internet and you stop the real crimes. If you want to remove the ECONOMIC incentive to generate NEW child porn, then you should make existing child porn freely available to undercut the market. I do not like child porn, but I hate state violence more. I do not like drugs, but am smart enough to know that making them illegal only INCREASES the market price of drugs and thus incentive the market to produce. Therefore, making childporn illegal increases its price and makes it more profitable to produce which makes kidnapping and human trafficking more profitable.
Hater's going to hate. Those that hate the hate groups and wish to deny them free speech are a bigger threat than the hate groups themselves. You fight hate groups with love, not with violence which only fuels their hate.
At the end of the day the "solutions" magnify the "problems" they try to solve by initiating force, restricting supply, preventing the free market from working, and increasing the profit for those who do the real crimes. You do not FIX social issues with violence, you just introduce more problems.
The challenge is that 99% of people feel compelled to violently resist and control other people. 99% of people are AFRAID of what would happen if they respond in love rather than violence and control.
If there is to be FILTERING of internet content it should be up to individual PRIVATE businesses to decide, not mandated via state violence. Think something like parental controls. Market forces will tend to relegate those kinds of websites to dark corners where normal people never have to look at them.