0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: joele on January 21, 2015, 03:20:22 amWhat if there is a delegate.gateway for this that will shoulder any fees in this kind of service, so it will be zero fee, 1:1 bitcoin <-> bitBTCor even give bonus when transferring bitcoin to bitBTCWhy should the DAC subsidize such a service? It is offered by 3rd parties and used by 3rd parties. Let them handle the fees among themselves.
What if there is a delegate.gateway for this that will shoulder any fees in this kind of service, so it will be zero fee, 1:1 bitcoin <-> bitBTCor even give bonus when transferring bitcoin to bitBTC
so the escrow feature could make crypto gateways trustless? what is the escrow mechanism?
Escrow is tested and ready for next DVS hard fork.
I mean when the gateway is running the user who transfers BTC, who do they have to trust if anyone? Could the gateway operator steal btc or fail to function?
Can someone provide a trust profile of this gateway?
I played a bit with this service, today.I realize I did not follow the instructions [partly because my Armory does not provide compresses private keys only the one that start with 5. So does the BTS client btw when you use wallet_dump_private_key, even though you say it does use compressed ones, maybe internally], anyway with that in mind I used amounts that I really do not care about.- I dumped the private key, using wallet_dump_private_key, of the active public key of an unregistered BTS account.- Imported those in the BTC wallet. -Transferred BTC to the gateway address from there and got the bitBTC.- Using the GUI sent those bitBTC to metaexchangebtc and got nothing back... No worries, as I said it was a very small amount, just letting you know how it went.
Request them to remove this. It would bring more volume and benefit them also.