31
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 20, 2014, 03:03:21 pm »BTSX8FpfpPGHbKyBLnNLeqyYYWGqD3gh3KL1kTBRssigo2G127cBVg
Thanks
sent
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
sent
32
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 20, 2014, 03:01:33 pm »BTSX64zcTNMp9TK5QxwG7V3zDQR3bLsca2PWFhLaMZXZLhWvhNZaxa
Cheers
Sent.
33
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 18, 2014, 02:56:19 pm »Account Key: BTSX6pAvEM5ZR9h7AMsRarhJJziXx4BEeyxGtt9vWRpK2Uv3bEQJHB
incoming.
34
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 18, 2014, 02:54:24 pm »Account key: BTSX5s9hHgv9bkaj3pZEt9UWn7yLcrbsMXTq8xsxGxpdcvjL4RwSqL
Thanks!
incoming.
35
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 18, 2014, 02:02:47 pm »Acc. key: BTSX85pNkhFaPdXsEWJZ4MFnKvqehwxDgE1VAJo5w6FD5DPr3v48pc
Thanks!
Incoming.
36
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 08, 2014, 02:39:07 pm »
37
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: August 08, 2014, 01:48:39 pm »
Can someone register me ? Thanks !
BTSX7tjZi2z6uZTdyRfVRt9SZtK5PPDMVn9DjUbfqDmQWHjKT1isPt
BTSX7tjZi2z6uZTdyRfVRt9SZtK5PPDMVn9DjUbfqDmQWHjKT1isPt
38
General Discussion / Re: Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS) White Paper
« on: April 04, 2014, 08:09:40 pm »
nice job.
In a previous thread a requirement was mentioned for each representative having to put up some coin in holding to be eligible for this task? did you determine that this was no longer necessary?
in section "Keeping Representatives Honest", your explanation states that it would be up to the wallet software to prevent new transactions tagged with an invalid-signing-representative id. why wouldn't the network itself prevent these new transactions? Or the network could allow these transactions but overwrite with null for a representative id. if some popular wallet software had a default representative id, and this representative was coerced or somehow turned malicious, the wallet might not prevent new transactions and thus the users could all still vote for the problematic representative. I think the network itself needs to prevent this case I'm not rely on the wallet software.
In a previous thread a requirement was mentioned for each representative having to put up some coin in holding to be eligible for this task? did you determine that this was no longer necessary?
in section "Keeping Representatives Honest", your explanation states that it would be up to the wallet software to prevent new transactions tagged with an invalid-signing-representative id. why wouldn't the network itself prevent these new transactions? Or the network could allow these transactions but overwrite with null for a representative id. if some popular wallet software had a default representative id, and this representative was coerced or somehow turned malicious, the wallet might not prevent new transactions and thus the users could all still vote for the problematic representative. I think the network itself needs to prevent this case I'm not rely on the wallet software.
39
General Discussion / Re: Dividends?
« on: March 26, 2014, 08:23:27 pm »
I think OldMan makes a strong case for monthly dividend payouts. “Destroy continuously and split monthly.” I would like to see this seriously considered as a requirement.
If Bitshares is going to advertise that it pays dividends (as it currently does) then these dividends need to manifest as a concrete inflow value that the user can easily connect to something tangible (IE ooh I can get a free lunch tomorrow). A dividend needs to be a transaction showing a deposit into the user’s wallet. I think it would be a big mistake to punt on implementing dividend transactions and instead think it is acceptable to solve this in the UI layer and display some calculated value percentage of the whole. I get it that it burning the fees is cleaner and handles the math, but it will not have the same impact on the user’s value perception.
Is there an opportunity to incentivize support of the TaPOS here? Something like: wallets that have made at least 1 transaction in the past month will receive dividend payout. Inactive wallets are penalized by not getting dividend payout.
If Bitshares is going to advertise that it pays dividends (as it currently does) then these dividends need to manifest as a concrete inflow value that the user can easily connect to something tangible (IE ooh I can get a free lunch tomorrow). A dividend needs to be a transaction showing a deposit into the user’s wallet. I think it would be a big mistake to punt on implementing dividend transactions and instead think it is acceptable to solve this in the UI layer and display some calculated value percentage of the whole. I get it that it burning the fees is cleaner and handles the math, but it will not have the same impact on the user’s value perception.
Is there an opportunity to incentivize support of the TaPOS here? Something like: wallets that have made at least 1 transaction in the past month will receive dividend payout. Inactive wallets are penalized by not getting dividend payout.
40
Keyhotee / Re: Keyhotee Rebranding - BitMail / BitKey / KeyMail / KeyID
« on: March 25, 2014, 08:00:30 pm »
keep keyhotee
