This is my stream of consiousness feedback on Super3's submission:
1) I think the flashy background graphics are too much.
2) I think the DAC jargon is too much to be displayed everywhere
3) Decentralized Funding Model -> Equal Opportunity / Etc
4) I like focusing on transparency
5) I don't like mentioning hard numbers for capital, those change all the time and should be implied by looking at our bounties.
6) I do not want memory coin to be mentioned anywhere but a list of other 3rd party DACs that honor protoshares, in other words it should be a footnote in the protoshares subsection and not linked all over our site. No offense to FreeTrade, but his coin did not honor the 10% required to get our official backing and promotion and we want to encourage 10% honoring in future DACs even by 3rd parties.
7) Research Driven... is heading in the right direction, but perhaps Innovation Driven... and lets focus on our core innovations:
a) DAC Metaphor (blockchains as a business model)
b) Dividends
c) Transactions as Proof of Stake
d) Debunking Mining as a means of Decentralization
e) Momentum Proof of Work -> Deprecated by above
f) Innovative community building (ProtoShares + Social Contract)
g) Innovative funding model, money as proof of work -> Angel Shares
Invictus Engineers market forces to produce outcomes without the need for contracts or violence.
9) I don't want to make our website about "Invictus the Company", but instead "Invictus the Movement", we are nothing without the community, the angels, and the philosophy. Lets focus on what WE are as a community and NOT what Invictus is doing as a company.
10) Invictus profits the same way everyone else does, buy owning a piece of DACs on the same equal opportunity terms we make available to everyone else.