0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: DestBest on March 08, 2016, 08:06:40 pmWe lack a "Get listed on BitShares DEX" button on bitshares.orgNice idea, Anyone disagree with this?
We lack a "Get listed on BitShares DEX" button on bitshares.org
Quote from: DestBest on March 08, 2016, 08:06:40 pmWe lack a "Get listed on BitShares DEX" button on bitshares.orgI never thought about that, it's a good idea Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on March 08, 2016, 08:57:51 pmi like the overall sentiment and this should be one area of our marketing someone runs with. Has anyone reached out to the SuperNET crew? they've pulled in some minor coins to their project, so pulling them into ours could have added synergy.Or have them migrate the entire thing here
i like the overall sentiment and this should be one area of our marketing someone runs with. Has anyone reached out to the SuperNET crew? they've pulled in some minor coins to their project, so pulling them into ours could have added synergy.
You own the network, but who pays for development?
Quote from: Empirical1.2 on March 08, 2016, 05:25:06 pmI don't understand. Why would a sophisticated fee system translate into increased network effect and value for the underlying blockchain those assets are based on? Take a look at what happens in Ethereum already: Developers complain about high fee prices.Basically because the fee in Ethereum depends on the architecture of the contract you want to run .. but NOT on the value that the smart contract brings to Ethereum as a business. They could reduce the fees and thus remove a chunk of their "income" (so to speak) .. or increase the fee and lose developers/dapps .. and all of this just because they cannot give different fees to different apps ..
I don't understand. Why would a sophisticated fee system translate into increased network effect and value for the underlying blockchain those assets are based on?
What exactly is Storj currently getting out of Counterparty? Just the ability to trade a token? If so we could certainly do so far better. Looks they're considering integrating with ETH though which I suppose will allow them to offer storage to smart contracts which could be useful.
Quote from: Empirical1.2 on March 08, 2016, 04:51:35 pmIt's not a bad idea but look at the https://coinmarketcap.com/assets/views/all/17 of the top 20 blockchain based assets & communities are on XCP, NXT & MSC.Yet XCP + NXT + MSC = < BTS Obviously it's not bad a bad thing to attract as many people as possible but thus far that strategy hasn't translated into increased network effect and value for the underlying blockchains that attract those coins and communities. Do they have a fee system as sophisticated as us?
It's not a bad idea but look at the https://coinmarketcap.com/assets/views/all/17 of the top 20 blockchain based assets & communities are on XCP, NXT & MSC.Yet XCP + NXT + MSC = < BTS Obviously it's not bad a bad thing to attract as many people as possible but thus far that strategy hasn't translated into increased network effect and value for the underlying blockchains that attract those coins and communities.