Lets test it. Can we discuss how this might be done? as this shapes up the idea looks like something that is pretty elegant and almost seems as though it should have been obvious before. but we really need to start testing big changes before making them so we can assess what we may or may not know about that might be problematic.
love the idea and looking forward to seeing a successful test
Well, fist of all when did you get me off your ignore list?
Second of all, I am truly aware that I am #4 on your most dangerous list [shortly after CH, eth and the gov]. I do not know who give you that I idea...and it does not really matter if it was someone that "has a real good vision and wide wing span" or it was your own imagination. What matters is that it is totally not true!
And third but the only real important question is : How you see this test playing out in real life? [and when you see those choses I am sure You will not be eager to jump in either scenario too soon]
Cause for me there are only 2 choice, really.
1. BM: "dShares just got more interesting."
or
2. TK: "BM is not on board as chief dev. So we are forking and keeping 5-7% as a development fund. The rest is 100% dropped on BTS"