Main > Stakeholder Proposals
Technical Delegates Real Time Chat
fuzzy:
I honestly think slack would be best for what you are looking for.
emski:
This is the skype chat group:
skype:?chat&blob=s7FK3ZkYII8DujtoAK6x7aTaeUTLgBMEWpeFAD0aRgPq6LKo2cJcynSH_xoV9V9xRd2pY_xjdv_rh88
It was useful today.
pollux:
We have about 5 folks in the #bitshares-delegates IRC channel. I recommend that all delegates who would like to be included in ad-hoc discussions join.
gamey:
--- Quote from: emski on December 12, 2014, 09:09:38 pm ---I dont share your opinion. Forum software is not mobile-friendly. It is full of non-essential stuff.
I would use another means of communication if I had the choice.
--- End quote ---
You can easily ignore the non-essential stuff. Any delegate should have the capability to do that. You go to the thread discussing the issue and ignore the rest of the forum.
Tapatalk works ok for mobile. People who are only mobile to begin with aren't going to be actively troubleshooting. So I don't understand.. but thats ok. I've pushed forum solutions in the past and it had limited success so what do I know.
Although with forum you'll get non-delegates etc who might have valuable input. shrug. who knows.
It seems like if you were trying to achieve greatest participation and consensus you would have put forums as an option to see how widespread others see forum use as an issue.
Myself, I use about 4 IM systems and whether they are running depends on a need to communicate after last reboot.
emski:
--- Quote from: gamey on December 12, 2014, 09:01:56 pm ---
--- Quote from: emski on December 12, 2014, 08:04:19 pm ---@gamey The initial intent of this is real time chat.
--- End quote ---
Ahh I got this thread confused with another? My bad.
I will stick by my point though. You need email for initial alert, then use forums. Typing 1 line messages and not having to hit the refresh button are not features that are > ubiquity of a basic forum. You type your new info in and hit save. When someone wants to read more data, they click refresh.
It is barely any less real time than an IM, except it requires people to hit refresh.
I mean, if you want a private group then instant messaging seems useful. If you want it to aid in troubleshooting I don't see how IM systems help much.
--- End quote ---
I dont share your opinion. Forum software is not mobile-friendly. It is full of non-essential stuff.
I would use another means of communication if I had the choice.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version