0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: svk on August 22, 2014, 05:52:49 pmQuote from: Riverhead on August 22, 2014, 04:18:16 amMy delegate CLI crashed. Missed three blocks.What can I provide log file was to determine why?From syslogCode: [Select]Aug 21 23:18:30 riverhead-del-server kernel: [110780.687870] bitshares_clien[6724]: segfault at 238 ip 000000000066cec6 sp 00007f58a4222a00 error 4 in bitshares_client[400000+1238000]Same thing just happened to me, lost three blocks as well. Relaunched now with gdb, but hope it doesn't happen again cause I can't sit around monitoring it all day today!I recommend setting your maximum connection count to 8 to reduce the likelihood of that happening. Also if you compile from github DAC Sun Limited has a potential fix.
Quote from: Riverhead on August 22, 2014, 04:18:16 amMy delegate CLI crashed. Missed three blocks.What can I provide log file was to determine why?From syslogCode: [Select]Aug 21 23:18:30 riverhead-del-server kernel: [110780.687870] bitshares_clien[6724]: segfault at 238 ip 000000000066cec6 sp 00007f58a4222a00 error 4 in bitshares_client[400000+1238000]Same thing just happened to me, lost three blocks as well. Relaunched now with gdb, but hope it doesn't happen again cause I can't sit around monitoring it all day today!
My delegate CLI crashed. Missed three blocks.What can I provide log file was to determine why?From syslogCode: [Select]Aug 21 23:18:30 riverhead-del-server kernel: [110780.687870] bitshares_clien[6724]: segfault at 238 ip 000000000066cec6 sp 00007f58a4222a00 error 4 in bitshares_client[400000+1238000]
Aug 21 23:18:30 riverhead-del-server kernel: [110780.687870] bitshares_clien[6724]: segfault at 238 ip 000000000066cec6 sp 00007f58a4222a00 error 4 in bitshares_client[400000+1238000]
You can email it to sales at syncad.com. There should be no private data in the logs. We're mostly interested in the p2p log.
Quote from: bytemaster on August 22, 2014, 12:57:59 pmQuote from: bdnoble on August 22, 2014, 12:39:03 pmAnyone else seeing this message? Is this bad? Code: [Select]nobledelegate (unlocked) >>> get_info6 key_not_found_exception: Key Not Foundunable to find key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:91 fetcherror fetching key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:101 fetch {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1256 get_block_id {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1241 get_block_header {} th_a common_api_client.cpp:1859 get_info {"command":"get_info"} th_a cli.cpp:471 execute_commandnobledelegate (unlocked) >>>I have filed a bug report on this. https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/669 Probably harmless... let me know if you are able to syncTurns out I am producing blocks. Which I assume means I'm in sync? Message doesn't go away though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: bdnoble on August 22, 2014, 12:39:03 pmAnyone else seeing this message? Is this bad? Code: [Select]nobledelegate (unlocked) >>> get_info6 key_not_found_exception: Key Not Foundunable to find key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:91 fetcherror fetching key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:101 fetch {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1256 get_block_id {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1241 get_block_header {} th_a common_api_client.cpp:1859 get_info {"command":"get_info"} th_a cli.cpp:471 execute_commandnobledelegate (unlocked) >>>I have filed a bug report on this. https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolkit/issues/669 Probably harmless... let me know if you are able to sync
Anyone else seeing this message? Is this bad? Code: [Select]nobledelegate (unlocked) >>> get_info6 key_not_found_exception: Key Not Foundunable to find key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:91 fetcherror fetching key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:101 fetch {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1256 get_block_id {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1241 get_block_header {} th_a common_api_client.cpp:1859 get_info {"command":"get_info"} th_a cli.cpp:471 execute_commandnobledelegate (unlocked) >>>
nobledelegate (unlocked) >>> get_info6 key_not_found_exception: Key Not Foundunable to find key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:91 fetcherror fetching key 0 {"key":0} th_a level_map.hpp:101 fetch {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1256 get_block_id {"block_num":0} th_a chain_database.cpp:1241 get_block_header {} th_a common_api_client.cpp:1859 get_info {"command":"get_info"} th_a cli.cpp:471 execute_commandnobledelegate (unlocked) >>>
wallet_set_transaction_scanning truewallet_rescan_blockchain
Quote from: dannotestein on August 22, 2014, 04:57:28 amQuote from: Riverhead on August 22, 2014, 04:37:21 amIt's running in gdb now. Do I just wait for a crash?The backtrace will be useful, but probably the most useful thing will be the logs around the time of the crash.I have my logs directory tar.gz'd. Is there an email I can send them to? Also, is there anything in there I shouldn't be sending? I'm assuming by this point the logs are scrubbed of private data but want to be sure.
Quote from: Riverhead on August 22, 2014, 04:37:21 amIt's running in gdb now. Do I just wait for a crash?The backtrace will be useful, but probably the most useful thing will be the logs around the time of the crash.
It's running in gdb now. Do I just wait for a crash?
*.charity and *.xeroc are up to date and seeing some disconnects from users because of invalid blocks (see above)besides that .. stable for the last few hours! nice work!
I think the fork is caused by subset of these nodes:MISSED 2014-08-22T10:27:10 daslab N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-22T10:40:50 btsnow N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-22T10:39:00 delegate.adam N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-22T10:38:20 delegate2.adam N/A N/A N/A N/A N/APerhaps the owners of these delegates can check if I'm correct.
Ok. We are looking into this top priority. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I upgraded one linux server to 0.4.5and I am getting often this message: (and only for 23.239.5.30:39242 ) "I am disconnecting peer 23.239.5.30:39242 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid"I checked the block explorer:http://blockchain.bitsuperlab.com/and I am not missing blocks yet and I am not on a fork...should I be concerned or can I safely upgrade my second server too?
I am disconnecting peer 80.240.133.79:1777 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalidI am disconnecting peer 69.90.132.209:45783 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid--- in sync with p2p network--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network--- there are now 24 active connections to the p2p network--- syncing with p2p network, 598 blocks left to fetchI am disconnecting peer 80.240.133.79:1777 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalidI am disconnecting peer 69.90.132.209:45783 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network--- in sync with p2p network--- there are now 24 active connections to the p2p network--- syncing with p2p network, 598 blocks left to fetchI am disconnecting peer 80.240.133.79:1777 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalidI am disconnecting peer 69.90.132.209:45783 for reason: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid--- there are now 23 active connections to the p2p network--- in sync with p2p network
Python Exception <class 'ImportError'> No module named 'gdb':#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x1e0) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x2539a18) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5290 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x2539850, message_to_send=...) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x26c0948, message_to_send=...) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x26c08e0) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) ( functor=<optimized out>, prom=0x1d4fca0) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0x1d4fcb0) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0x1d4fcb0) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/riverhead/github/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
HEIGHT TIMESTAMP SIGNING DELEGATE # TXS SIZE TOTAL FEES LATENCY PROCESSING TIME===================================================================================================================275169 2014-08-21T00:01:30 btsnow 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 109139 0.006298
--- there are now 6 active connections to the p2p network--- there are now 7 active connections to the p2p network(wallet closed) >>> info{ "blockchain_head_block_num": 275170, "blockchain_head_block_age": "31 hours old", "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-21T00:18:20", "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "0.86 %", "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 303, "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "222,945.09399 BTSX", "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.84313 BTSX", "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,946,839.85184 BTSX", "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 55, "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 9 minutes in the future", "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-22T07:18:10", "blockchain_random_seed": "892ba7eb32d3de2c58a98cc66e91ba0a6b5cc381", "client_data_dir": "/home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/programs/client/dd4.5", "network_num_connections": 7, "network_num_connections_max": 200, "ntp_time": "2014-08-22T07:09:08", "ntp_time_error": 0.00049100000000000001, "wallet_open": false, "wallet_unlocked": null, "wallet_unlocked_until": null, "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": null, "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": null, "wallet_scan_progress": null, "wallet_block_production_enabled": null, "wallet_next_block_production_time": null, "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null}Peer 80.240.133.79:1777 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid
MISSED 2014-08-20T22:45:00 emski.bitdelegate N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:50 init4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:40 black-widow N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:30 angel.bitdelegate N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:20 b.delegate.xeroc N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:10 delegate1-galt N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:44:00 mrs.agsexplorer N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:50 clout-delegate3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:40 init28 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:30 delegate.redflag N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:20 bitcoiners N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:10 delegate.taolje N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:43:00 anchor.crazybit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:42:50 delegate.adam N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:42:40 spartako2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AMISSED 2014-08-20T22:42:30 d.dacsun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A275164 2014-08-20T22:42:20 init8 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113888 0.000359275163 2014-08-20T22:42:10 calabiyau 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113898 0.000363275162 2014-08-20T22:42:00 democracy 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113908 0.000385275161 2014-08-20T22:41:50 crazybit 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113918 0.000431MISSED 2014-08-20T22:41:40 skyscraperfarms N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A275160 2014-08-20T22:41:30 angel-delegate 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113938 0.000357275159 2014-08-20T22:41:20 init65 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113948 0.000373275158 2014-08-20T22:41:10 mr.scroodge 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113958 0.00044275157 2014-08-20T22:41:00 init18 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113968 0.000385275156 2014-08-20T22:40:50 delegated-proof-of-steak 1 410 0.50000 BTSX 113978 0.001152275155 2014-08-20T22:40:40 init9 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113988 0.000395275154 2014-08-20T22:40:30 delegate.follow-my-vote 0 166 0.00000 BTSX 113998 0.000346
What hardware are you running it on?
--- there are now 127 active connections to the p2p network(wallet closed) >>>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0xc36440e71511b255) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:3333 while( n->next_blocked_mutex ) {(gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0xc36440e71511b255) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0xcb6d342) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b52a6 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message ( this=0xc280af8bd9da8c31, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b59a8 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message ( this=this@entry=0xcc722c8, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab2a0 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0xcc72260) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab99c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xd20ef90) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c503 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xd20efa0)---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
gdb ./bitshares_clientrun --data-dir=delegate
bt
Quote from: RejectKid on August 22, 2014, 12:22:48 amSomething seems wrong, It sits here until it eventually crashesSame here. I've tried deleting everything, reinstalling, reimporting the wallet and client still crashes eventually trying to sync.
Something seems wrong, It sits here until it eventually crashes
Quote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:31:59 amgit submodule update doesn't pull anything. Code: [Select]:~/bitsharesx$ git submodule update:~/bitsharesx$ This looks like an issue we are tracking. With that function and mutex. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
git submodule update doesn't pull anything. Code: [Select]:~/bitsharesx$ git submodule update:~/bitsharesx$
:~/bitsharesx$ git submodule update:~/bitsharesx$
Cool everything seems good. Only "problem" is the sys tray icon is not in the correct spot. All the way over to the left, I have had this happen with some wallets before. Is there an easy fix for that?
Quote from: HackFisher on August 22, 2014, 01:26:24 amQuote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:23:48 amQuote from: HackFisher on August 22, 2014, 01:17:50 amQuote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:16:54 ammy delegate just crashed and missed a block. Code: [Select](gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb) Did you tryCode: [Select]git submodule update ?Code: [Select](wallet closed) >>> about{ "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "ceffdd1b52300daf00f05e5c15d1723fd881d4df", "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "5 hours ago", "fc_revision": "9e75d47ba39e31e031da64e32b866903e066ecd1", "fc_revision_age": "7 hours ago", "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 21 2014 at 18:58:18"after restart of client. is there a newer fc?yes, there is a change to fc, fc need to be updated.do I need to rebuild the client or just git submodule update?
Quote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:23:48 amQuote from: HackFisher on August 22, 2014, 01:17:50 amQuote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:16:54 ammy delegate just crashed and missed a block. Code: [Select](gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb) Did you tryCode: [Select]git submodule update ?Code: [Select](wallet closed) >>> about{ "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "ceffdd1b52300daf00f05e5c15d1723fd881d4df", "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "5 hours ago", "fc_revision": "9e75d47ba39e31e031da64e32b866903e066ecd1", "fc_revision_age": "7 hours ago", "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 21 2014 at 18:58:18"after restart of client. is there a newer fc?yes, there is a change to fc, fc need to be updated.
Quote from: HackFisher on August 22, 2014, 01:17:50 amQuote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:16:54 ammy delegate just crashed and missed a block. Code: [Select](gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb) Did you tryCode: [Select]git submodule update ?Code: [Select](wallet closed) >>> about{ "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "ceffdd1b52300daf00f05e5c15d1723fd881d4df", "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "5 hours ago", "fc_revision": "9e75d47ba39e31e031da64e32b866903e066ecd1", "fc_revision_age": "7 hours ago", "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 21 2014 at 18:58:18"after restart of client. is there a newer fc?
Quote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 01:16:54 ammy delegate just crashed and missed a block. Code: [Select](gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb) Did you tryCode: [Select]git submodule update ?
my delegate just crashed and missed a block. Code: [Select](gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb)
(gdb) bt#0 get_tail (next=<synthetic pointer>, h=0x907676b313d3a84b) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:33#1 fc::mutex::unlock (this=this@entry=0x302fe4c) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/mutex.cpp:160#2 0x00000000007b5226 in ~scoped_lock (this=<synthetic pointer>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/scoped_lock.hpp:8#3 bts::net::detail::message_oriented_connection_impl::send_message (this=0x83b8f563388ca909, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:195#4 0x00000000007b5928 in bts::net::message_oriented_connection::send_message (this=this@entry=0x10f8ef98, message_to_send=...) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/message_oriented_connection.cpp:267#5 0x00000000007ab220 in bts::net::peer_connection::send_queued_messages_task (this=0x10f8ef30) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:178#6 0x00000000007ab91c in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/net/peer_connection.cpp:222#7 fc::detail::void_functor_run<bts::net::peer_connection::send_message(const bts::net::message&)::__lambda2>::run(void *, void *) (functor=<optimized out>, prom=0xed599f0) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/include/fc/thread/task.hpp:56#8 0x000000000066c483 in fc::task_base::run_impl (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:42#9 0x000000000066cb35 in fc::task_base::run (this=this@entry=0xed59a00) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/task.cpp:31#10 0x000000000066acbb in run_next_task (this=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:379#11 fc::thread_d::process_tasks (this=this@entry=0x184f350) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:402#12 0x000000000066af06 in fc::thread_d::start_process_tasks (my=25490256) at /home/user/bitsharesx/libraries/fc/src/thread/thread_d.hpp:359#13 0x0000000000d4a85e in make_fcontext ()#14 0x000000000184f350 in ?? ()#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()(gdb)
git submodule update
(wallet closed) >>> about{ "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "ceffdd1b52300daf00f05e5c15d1723fd881d4df", "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "5 hours ago", "fc_revision": "9e75d47ba39e31e031da64e32b866903e066ecd1", "fc_revision_age": "7 hours ago", "compile_date": "compiled on Aug 21 2014 at 18:58:18"
Quote from: puppies on August 22, 2014, 12:18:47 amQuote from: cygnify on August 22, 2014, 12:11:11 amLooks like I didn't install Qt properly last few times. Trying arhag's instructions now, let you know if I get stuck, should be OK.Installing and setting qt up manually is a pain in the butt. Code: [Select]sudo apt-get install qt5-default libqt5webkit5-dev works for me on 14.04And its way easier.Well followed those instructions perfectly. Get to last step to run BitSharesX and it can't find the file because it wasn't there. I had no errors up until that point, and I did install Qt manually, wish I had known about the other option. I think a proper guide is very much in order for this...Edit: Oh wait the BitSharesX program was in cd ~/bitsharesx-build/programs/qt_wallet/bin any reason why it is in bin? Should I move it or Ok to run from there?
Quote from: cygnify on August 22, 2014, 12:11:11 amLooks like I didn't install Qt properly last few times. Trying arhag's instructions now, let you know if I get stuck, should be OK.Installing and setting qt up manually is a pain in the butt. Code: [Select]sudo apt-get install qt5-default libqt5webkit5-dev works for me on 14.04And its way easier.
Looks like I didn't install Qt properly last few times. Trying arhag's instructions now, let you know if I get stuck, should be OK.
sudo apt-get install qt5-default libqt5webkit5-dev
Something seems wrong, It sits here until it eventually crasheshttps://www.dropbox.com/s/9htym8knvz8xhcy/Screenshot%202014-08-21%2020.21.06.png
Is there a guide with step by step instructions how to get this running on ubuntu with gui? I've tried a couple times using information from a few different sources and never managed to get it running with the gui. Plus it would be nice to have a guide all in one place with working gui, because if I'm having problems I can't be the only one?
"the program cant start because crashrpt1402.dll is missing from your computer"