Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 68
646
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BSIP 36 proposal - Remove expired feeds
« on: February 24, 2018, 10:56:32 pm »
Would it be possible to leave behind 1 feed per day per price feed publisher? So that whilst still achieving the reduction in memory/storage requirements we can still have a partial historical price reference for later price analysis?

647
General Discussion / Re: ETF on Blockchain
« on: February 24, 2018, 06:11:43 pm »
Excellent work, congratulations on your win! :)

648
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: New BSIP's about market engine improvements
« on: February 20, 2018, 10:51:07 pm »
These BSIPs look great @abit, I'll vote to support their implementation. Keep up the great work  :)

649
I will fully support this worker proposal, it's a great idea & the bitshares-ui worker proposals have already proven massively valuable!

650
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Legal Council about BTS and No-action
« on: February 16, 2018, 05:01:34 pm »
@xeroc Do you think HERO and Hertz algorithm based assets would be treated any differently than traditional smartcoins such as bitUSD/bitCNY?

Cheers :)

651
General Discussion / Re: BitShares Discord Tip Bot
« on: February 10, 2018, 12:35:09 am »
I feel that a problem with all tip bots is that you must deposit funds onto them which introduces a large amount of centralized risk. What would be far safer would being able to deduce an user's bitshares account from their discord name if different - that way you could easily just send them the funds directly instead of worrying about an individual running away with users deposits.

652
I don't think openledger's FIAT offerings are in the picture here, we're talking about new FIAT onramps through lykke not OL.
First importantly, the only on/off ramp that will open there is against BTS once we have legal clarity for BTS (hint: read the worker proposal: http://www.bitshares.foundation/worker/budget/2018-02-legal-council-bts) ... the plan is to go further and request legal clarity for bitassets for currencies like bitUSD, bitCNY etc ..
I'd think that the bitassets would be far less questionable than BTS itself, because there is less of the mixed up equity terminology surrounding them.

Looks good, though I'm not entirely fond of pandering solely to Bittrex. That said, a successful no-action intent from the SEC would probably be massively beneficial for future exchange addition. Idk if we should be pushing BTS to centralized exchanges as much as we should be pushing bitassets - for one bitassets lock up collateral, and another non-BTS assets held by centralized exchanges pose no voting threat (exchanges voting with BTS, unless bitAssets count towards polls?)..

653
I signed up for a lykke account today and even bought some of their shares.

I hope they can be a real fiat on off ramp for bitshares
Problem is that we need off ramp too and openEUR, USD does not workfor some reason.
I don't think openledger's FIAT offerings are in the picture here, we're talking about new FIAT onramps through lykke not OL.

654
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Payger - Payment + Messenger
« on: February 09, 2018, 01:05:12 pm »
Payger is an exit scam for the Blockpay project.

More on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2804399.0

Christoph defrauded Blockpay token buyers from the pre-ICO

He transferred proceeds from ICO funds on his own accounts.

https://busy.org/@stevepaterson/the-face-of-the-bitshares-foundation-ico-crowd-magazine-manager-annemieke-dirkes-threatens-to-blackmail-business-partners

Surely Blockpay tokens are being brought forwards to this new project? After all, blockpay's website redirects to the payger website. If not, eww.

655
General Discussion / Re: open sourcing the explorer.
« on: February 06, 2018, 09:00:41 pm »
explorer front end code released https://github.com/oxarbitrage/open-explorer under MIT.
Absolute legend! Great work :D  +5%

656
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: February 06, 2018, 05:59:58 pm »
@ag2: Speaking of the VIX, it just got halted! https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/960880138257948673

Time for Hertz to replace the VIX? :D

657
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] witness.hiblockchain
« on: February 06, 2018, 04:06:38 pm »
What are your plans for publishing price feeds for smartcoins?

Would you consider publishing price feeds for Hertz? https://sites.google.com/view/hertz-aba/

Thanks  +5%

We forked the pricefeed script form https://github.com/pch957/btsprice and made some changes.
The basic smartcoin lists are : “BTC”, “SILVER”, “GOLD”, “TRY”, “SGD”, “HKD”, “NZD”, “CNY”,
    “MXN”, “CAD”, “CHF”, “AUD”, “GBP”, “JPY”, “EUR”, “USD”, “KRW”, “ARS”

About Hertz  I saw an  issue here https://github.com/pch957/btsprice/issues/4
We may publish feeding price for Hertz after doing more research

I've increased the bounty to 750 bitUSD for Hertz implementation in btsprice, I would massively appreciate its development if you're considering accepting the task. Its inclusion in btsprice will likely result in another 5 price feed publishers which would be excellent for Hertz!

Looking forwards to your future witness updates  +5%

658
General Discussion / Re: OpenLedger is tracking you.
« on: February 06, 2018, 02:20:33 pm »
That's not cool, this kind of analytics should be only within the openledger web wallet. Bit of an invasion of privacy without prior approval :/

Its removal sounds appropriate.

659
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: February 05, 2018, 06:10:55 pm »
Bump! Any interest in the btsprice dev bounty?

Once wackou has created a new release, verbaltech's feeds will line up with the other price feed publishers & Hertz will be highly accurate. We could activate Hertz now technically.

660
Will this work alongside current documentation uplift efforts? https://t.me/joinchat/AWRo40N1sGr9SNGo_pv3KA

Or could there be overlap in work being done?

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 68