I was hoping for a comment on my Reply #17 regarding address 14fXr2UTa17CadcZ911N7TBFqMLpqsfNae
How was the http://pastebin.com/u9WKpcAb created?
I'm just curious as to how the discrepancy could have arisen, and whether there are any ramifications...
Generated using:
http://bitshares.org/resources/genesis-blocks/
Maybe you can see if the difference is in the generator or postprocessing on freetrade's side.
That discrepancy is very curious indeed, I would expect it to either be totally off or be right on target.
We will definitely be much more rigorous with AGS before any later snapshot. FreeTrade sort of caught us off guard and neither he nor we have time to write a whole new parser for auditing. IMO him honoring AGS at all is "good enough" for now. Bummer you're 3 lottoshares short though =\
Thanks for your time toast.
The figure produced by the generator differs from the figure I calculated from AGS Explorer (subtracting AGS donation from 1st June).
Assuming I've worked it out right (?) I'm baffled - is there a problem with the generator?
Is this genesis block generator to be used for Bitshares X, does anyone know?
I'm not expecting FreeTrade to spend time on this for LottoShares, but am concerned about a potential flaw somewhere which could affect BitShares stuff going forward.
Does anyone think this is worth looking into (sorry, I wouldn't know where to begin)?