Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 69
781
I feel like this is a power grab and won't vote to approve this.

How can the authorities have any impact on the DEX? Gateways and centralized exchanges are the only vulnerable entities, of which BTS is neither.

$50k over 15 months isn't too bad for some of the work which you propose, however mandating that you're the one that dictates what work must be done seems like undermining subsequent worker proposals.

"There can be only one representative for the BitShares blockchain, as otherwise other parties will use this to disqualify all." Yet there are many representatives of bitcoin and nobody cares about that given that those who control it change over time (POW), much like how shareholders change over time.

"Propose changes to the BTS holders in order to become compliant with specific regulations" Care to elaborate on what this means?

If you mean exchanges need someone official to contact, then they can contact witnesses and committee members whilst halting wallets if there's a serious issue. If they're not confident enough to talk to these key members then they're not going to talk to you.

782
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Compliance Work
« on: October 17, 2017, 07:09:11 pm »
I don't see this as necessary, if witnesses/committee members find themselves in regulatory hot water then they can be replaced with users outside the affected areas.
Only gateways should have compliance concerns, of which that's their business not BTS'.
$50k for getting Bittrex to re-integrate BTS/bitUSD is a bit of a joke, we could get added to multiple exchanges for that much. Besides, DEX > CEX & Bittrex loss has been factored into the price already.
And $50k for every additional exchange that lists a BTS asset? That's mental, most exchanges which charge a fee only ask for a few thousand, let centralized exchanges come to Bitshares than fork out this way.

783
We must give 3rd parties (exchanges and other businesses) sufficient time to get notified and upgrade.
2 weeks should be sufficient enough time for anyone to upgrade once we've gained their attention (likely the hardest bit for poloniex, haha!)
I'm just impatient :P

784
Burning funds that are already locked away in the reserve pool won't make much difference to the market cap.

What will make a difference is if we spend these funds wisely on development, documentation and marketing.

785
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: October 09, 2017, 02:34:42 pm »
Price feed script changes

  • Created a price feed verification script! Using this, I was able to confirm that the phase was correctly set & Wednesdays line up as the primary Hz day for the next 10 years.
  • Created dedicated python functions for improved dynamic use. Anyone can fork the price feed scripts, change these values and begin publishing price feeds for your issued ABA.
  • Pushed updates to Xeroc & Wackou's price feed script PRs.

Spreadsheet changes

  • Improved timestamp accuracy (now accounts for change in period)
  • Applied new default variables
  • Included proof of phase validity (10 years of wednesdays with only values 0.5, 1.0 & 1.5).

Variable changes

  • Amplitude = 1/3 (No longer 1/2)
  • Period = 28 days (No longer 30.43, to line up with the typical work week).
  • Phase = < 1 day (To make wednesday the primary Hz day).
Community updates

  • I've spoken during the last two (40 &amp; 41) bitshares hangouts about HERTZ.

TODO

  • Poll multiple full nodes for the BTS/USD settlement price, so as to harden script from compromised nodes.
  • Find willing high-frequency (at least a couple times per day) price feed publishers.
  • Improve upon the hertz-verification.py script
    • Output charts within the script.
    • Possibly pull BTS historical data to plot how HERTZ would have faired against past price movements.
  • Further consider the amplitude value (still too high?)
  • Run initially in Bitshares testnet.
  • Wait for BSIP-0018 to go live prior to running HERTZ asset in production.

Best regards,
cm-steem

786
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: October 01, 2017, 06:34:15 pm »
Some interesting ideas:

Creating a Trochoid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trochoid) or Cycloid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycloid) ABA.


Creating a Trochoidal wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trochoidal_wave) ABA - "In fluid dynamics, a trochoidal wave or Gerstner wave is an exact solution of the Euler equations for periodic surface gravity waves. It describes a progressive wave of permanent form on the surface of an incompressible fluid of infinite depth."

Alternatively, combining sin waves (wave inference) with different frequencies (calculator: https://academo.org/demos/wave-interference-beat-frequency/)


787
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: September 30, 2017, 04:07:46 pm »
I created an ELI5 worthy intro to HERTZ on steemit: https://steemit.com/hertz/@cm-steem/what-is-the-hertz-algorithm-based-asset

788
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: September 29, 2017, 09:20:39 am »
Once the HERTZ price feeds are in a production worthy state & BSIP-0018 is implemented, would anyone be interested in being a private price feed publisher?

790
General Discussion / Re: HERTZ - Oscillating Formula Based Asset
« on: September 23, 2017, 09:23:11 pm »
I've been thinking about HERTZ recently, and thought about what if we simply pegged against BTS and applied the sin wave modifier to that? So the Hertz token would range from 0.5 to 1.5 BTS throughout the month.

Why use BTS as the reference asset?
  • Less risk of force settlement due to BTS (or reference asset) price volatility.
  • Decoupling of BTS from external assets.
  • Less likelihood of global settlement events taking place due to reduced forced settlement risk.
  • Predictable price volatility, enabling risk-free borrowing given sufficient collateral.

I suppose it'd be the same as using bitUSD as collateral to borrow bitUSD into existence, except using the core BTS asset.

Steemit post: https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/back-to-algorithm-based-assets-and-targeting-bts-as-an-mpa-s-reference-asset

Thoughts?

791
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares BlockChain Explorer Community suggestions
« on: September 03, 2017, 07:00:43 pm »
What about a prediction market view to promote their use?

793
I've added the door.one exchange to gridcoin.us, as we have the open.grc gateway on the bts dex. Looking forwards to this being in production :)

794
General Discussion / Re: Market pegged assets
« on: August 30, 2017, 02:09:19 pm »
You can always buy USD directly with your BTS instead of lending the USD into existence, that way you don't need to worry about collateral.

795
General Discussion / Re: BlockPay in Serious Trouble
« on: August 30, 2017, 02:07:18 pm »
https://blockpay.ch/general/blockpay-status-update/

They just posted an announcement there regarding the split, terrible ico lol..

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 69