0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: RejectKid on November 10, 2013, 04:12:01 amAnother quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?Not using the GPU... so far I cannot figure out a way to make that work.
Another quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?
Great work Bytemaster! I really appreciate your efforts and think you got a good thing started.a comment and a question:Comment:When you get a chance please add time stamps to the sending notifications on the client. That would really help me figure out my productivity.Question:I'm running the linux client with no problems but the mac client will not start. complains about libstdc++.6.dylibdylib: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEmreferenced from pool_minerexpected in /usr/lib/libstdc++6.dylibseems strange since you have the lib in the tar.gz but it isn't looking for it there. That lib also exists in /usr/lib/ but maybe yours is modified?Any help you guys can provide would be appreciated because this is a mbpr that hashes at 20 hpm with bitcoind
Quote from: testz on November 10, 2013, 02:41:25 amQuote from: Amazon on November 10, 2013, 02:39:29 amQuote from: testz on November 10, 2013, 02:36:03 amDifficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retargetOnly block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.@bytemaster: Do you plan to update the wallet and make re-target every 2016 as planed? Or we stay as is?I am going to keep it as is, no need to introduce a fork and people don't seem to mind the faster block production.
Quote from: Amazon on November 10, 2013, 02:39:29 amQuote from: testz on November 10, 2013, 02:36:03 amDifficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retargetOnly block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.@bytemaster: Do you plan to update the wallet and make re-target every 2016 as planed? Or we stay as is?
Quote from: testz on November 10, 2013, 02:36:03 amDifficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retargetOnly block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.
Difficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retarget
Quote from: bytemaster on November 10, 2013, 02:14:13 amQuote from: bytemaster on November 10, 2013, 01:50:03 amQuote from: gabainc on November 10, 2013, 01:46:32 amGreat job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?Anyone? What is the experience with the other pools like? I was making just above 3pts in 1 hour with the other pools and now i'm making under 3pts with yours and that was timed form the last payment at8:27 to 9:27 mybalance was 2.59363
Quote from: bytemaster on November 10, 2013, 01:50:03 amQuote from: gabainc on November 10, 2013, 01:46:32 amGreat job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?Anyone? What is the experience with the other pools like?
Quote from: gabainc on November 10, 2013, 01:46:32 amGreat job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before...