Standardized workflow for issues/improvements in the GUI

[wmbutler]

@akado please post this to a GitHub issue with screenshots. More than happy to look into it.

[Akado]

If I place an order let's supposed I want to sell asset X at 0,2btc and I want to sell five of those, it's 1 btc total. but If I want to sell at 0,0034 for example it will mess up the total saying some exagerated numbers like 600 btc. It happened on the METAFEES market. And if I placed that order, it wouldn't appear on the order book nor would it appear my order to cancel. I think I had to refresh the page if I remember correctly, so I could cancel it

[wmbutler]

This thread is probably outdated now. For all issues related to the GUI, I strongly recommend that you go here:

Issues can be filtered by enhancement and bug. You can also post new issues here. I will categorize and respond to as many as possible. I have a worker proposal that is almost fully funded for handling the mediation of these issues:

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/issues

Please vote for me:

http://cryptofresh.com/workers
update_worker_votes your-account {"vote_for":["1.14.9"]} true

[Akado]

for some reason METAFEE:METAEX.BTC market only appears on the hosted wallet and not the light client.

Known issue, already fixed in dev.

Awesome! Good to know 

[svk]

for some reason METAFEE:METAEX.BTC market only appears on the hosted wallet and not the light client.

Known issue, already fixed in dev.

[Akado]

for some reason METAFEE:METAEX.BTC market only appears on the hosted wallet and not the light client.

[jakub]

The current approach to the Deposit/Withdraw functionality currently looks very chaotic in terms of UX.
Firstly, there is this artificial split between Bridges and Gateways.
Secondly, each service provider seems to have its own concept of UI (specific to its service) which looks very inconsistent when viewed on a single page.

What I propose is to have the Deposit/Withdraw functionality organized in a similar way markets are organized:
(1) There should be an initial page where all gateway/bridge providers are listed (e.g. Blocktrades, Transwiser, Metaexchange, OpenLedger etc).
(2) Each provider should have its own dedicated page (just as each market has its own page). So by clicking on any provider listed in (1) you would navigate to a separate page which will be organized according to the specific offer of the provider and fully managed by the provider.

In this approach the gateway/bridge functionality would be detached from the account page and listed as a separate item in the top menu bar:
Dashboard | Explore | Deposit/Withdraw | Trade | Transfer

What do you think?

github: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/issues/521

[xeroc]

I can tell you that our wallet is more responsive and feels faster than gatehub at my first impression

[cass]

thx akado

[Akado]

@valzav @cass

[Akado]

does anybody have some bigger screenshots of gatehub.net UI?

http://40.media.tumblr.com/4d5631912fa68f2da28516cb704f154e/tumblr_inline_nnvx8j2pBJ1tsyj8x_1280.png

@valzav
is that big enough? You can zoom in a little but not much :/

You also have some here but quality isnt teh best, plus cant zoom in
https://www.facebook.com/GateHubNet/photos_stream


Have you considered something similar for the menu? Like a darker or some colour that contrasts with the rest the same way they have the center coloured and the sides darker? Of course we dont want something equal to what they have but something similar gives it a good look and helps users separate info and doesnt distract the eyes

[mike623317]

That where we need to get to. See how good that interface looks. Smart, crisp and professional. If we could try and imitate that I think we'd be golden.

Look at their wallet interface too. Simple yet slick.

[valzav]

does anybody have some bigger screenshots of gatehub.net UI?

[jakub]

The MORE MARKETS button is too inconspicuous, for a new user it's really hard to spot it.
Especially when compered to other similar buttons in the top section.

EDIT: Maybe it's good idea to have the list of favorites markets rendered as a drop-down list? This would imply that switching between different markets would work in a similar way to switching between different accounts on the market page? The drop-down could be attached to the market name (e.g. USD : BTS)  in the very top left corner.

It would release a lot of space in the bottom right corner of the screen and the troll-box could go there.
What do you think?



github: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/issues/448

[cass]

We need to remember that there is usually a wow effect when you see a UI design for the first time but this feeling often fades away once you get used to it and start using it.
I have to admit that our BTS 2.0 design scores well in this respect - for me it's still a real aesthetic pleasure to play with it.

yep totally agreed - and tested the ripple GUI .. but must also admit . the first view is by far mor impressive then using it