tell me which is not correct?
Kind of everything about your original post.
l stop reading everything about Bitshares, because as long as l read things gets elaborate,latest snapshot(shares locked up 2yrs) rebranding btsx,changing bitsharestalk.org to something else, dev got 1.5% bts shares almos 2k btc today rate,hey what s happening?
Is this meant to be one sentence? If I understand it at all, it shoud be roughly three sentences. My rough translation
I have stopped reading everthing about Bitshares. This is because as long as I read, things just get more elaborate. More snapshots, funds being locked up for two years, changing btsx to bts. Developers getting an extra 1.5% bts (roughly 2 thousand BTC.
following the crazy sauce sentence above you follow it up with
and latest thing is an ex CEO fud.
Which really doesn't make any sense. I understand that you may be upset with Dan and Stan speaking of communication with a former CEO, and may be feeling as if you are being misled. A better way of explaining that would get you further though.
Next up is
give us braek will ya,things are getting worse n worse.is Daniel Larimer aware of this things? if he is then l m calling him scam and ready to confront him.fuck this bitfucking share thing,this is fucking a mess.
While this is technically broken up into separate sentences, I have a hard time believing this was on purpose. Although now that I think of it "fuck this bitfucking share thing,this is fucking a mess" almost makes sense as a complete sentence.
Ultimately dude, you need to find a way to represent your thoughts in a better manner. Otherwise people are gonna assume you're drunk, and your points will largely be ignored.