Here's the whole transaction for reference:
[
"d888ac6e13fe60d9cdf74c5752b8a4a3f827f4a2",{
"trx": {
"expiration": "2015-01-14T09:46:35",
"delegate_slate_id": null,
"operations": [{
"type": "deposit_op_type",
"data": {
"amount": 10000,
"condition": {
"asset_id": 0,
"slate_id": 0,
"type": "withdraw_signature_type",
"data": {
"owner": "BTS82mTkM4nZLBUs7FZBux3zDV4TvdsUcdYR",
"memo": {
"one_time_key": "BTS7P2Ped3mpLeQfuiH8HE9Smoy6cHom1YNNzEqgDg5EmPFPLMDrn",
"encrypted_memo_data": "bd8f6702454b0e04284fedcbaf7e4859603a2df1c32f83909ac88e95fc5d13ffb1d71b2f92cec504ef3599c76bd1a7f59e13a535dbed9f96489c906ef131fec3"
}
}
}
}
},{
"type": "withdraw_op_type",
"data": {
"balance_id": "BTS6UCvWSmZAsSmhp5E4JRrTLqirBFu7Lfng",
"amount": 10000,
"claim_input_data": ""
}
},{
"type": "withdraw_op_type",
"data": {
"balance_id": "BTSASw7dDN1u3VaSNw5SNYk1WNN9uKBWZoDU",
"amount": 10000,
"claim_input_data": ""
}
}
],
"signatures": [
"1f15c6e8076429d5c6a26eb314a2fa0aba1a0650f9af592abd52b25c9377383b4210f01c8c0c18ce1029d311822817dfcea9ceff1fee05f4ad31a5d62bdda6198a",
"1f6868afae9b4f8d4d7566ec95d71760e695fdd8d232bf0ca3c12b2c764504ec35152a9df4cba00afe46089141bcf5064d28aac6aaf5e36ec41b90f606b0fe83bf"
]
},
"current_op_index": 3,
"signed_keys": [],
"validation_error": null,
"provided_deposits": [[
"BTSKdc8euepN6bZ32K5sdvvQQA7GD3udToN7",{
"amount": 10000,
"asset_id": 0
}
]
],
"deposits": [[
0,{
"amount": 10000,
"asset_id": 0
}
]
],
"withdraws": [[
0,{
"amount": 20000,
"asset_id": 0
}
]
],
"yield": [],
"deltas": [[
0,{
"amount": 10000,
"asset_id": 0
}
],[
1,{
"amount": -10000,
"asset_id": 0
}
],[
2,{
"amount": -10000,
"asset_id": 0
}
]
],
"required_fees": {
"amount": 0,
"asset_id": 0
},
"alt_fees_paid": {
"amount": 0,
"asset_id": 0
},
"balance": [[
0,
10000
]
],
"net_delegate_votes": [],
"chain_location": {
"block_num": 1520903,
"trx_num": 0
}
}
]
As you can see, balance_id only occurs in the operations array and there are two of them.
deposit_op_type contains a single owner field, is that what you are talking about?