Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ingenesist

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General Discussion / Re: Looking for Bitshares Developers in Seattle area
« on: January 29, 2017, 09:20:36 pm »
Thanks - asking me to download telegram - is the tech talk on a different forum? 

2
General Discussion / Looking for Bitshares Developers in Seattle area
« on: January 29, 2017, 08:33:59 pm »
The Ingenesist Projectis looking for Bitshares development expertise in the Seattle Area for a global engineering token project.  We have strong endorsements, points of entry to mainstream markets, and university affiliations. Please contact me directly at ingenesist^gmail if interested or if you have any references.  thank you

3
General Discussion / Are Blockchains insurable?
« on: August 04, 2016, 10:04:26 pm »
Here is a post that I just put up on Steemit related to blockchain and novel insurance applications.  This post includes a link to my recent paper for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Center for Insurance Policy and Research. 

https://steemit.com/insurance/@ingenesist/are-blockchains-insurable

I look forward to any thoughts or insights. Thank you

4
Actually, the mortgage crisis was precipitated by the inability to reconcile leveraged value with actual real value of homes and properties.  This is entirely an engineering problem - land surveyors, building condition, verification and validation of real conditions, etc.  They had a few trillion in loans but no way to assess their true value.  You'll remember the debates around "Mark to market" which means that the market devalues the homes which makes a bank insolvent not unlike a mass withdrawal - or "not Mark to Market" which means that the purchase price is the actual price - thereby ripping off all of the people who are caught below market. These problems occurred because there was no way to adjust the property value for the actual physical condition / definition of a property.  This, again, is an engineering problem.   

Here is a post that I wrote called Zertify Zillow Zestimates which suggests that variance on calculated value can exceed +/- 25% over actual.  http://www.ingenesist.com/zertify-zillow-zestimates-on-blockchain/


5
Thanks Thom;

Actually, insurance started out as a decentralized "mutual" agreement between independent actors.  Say 10 people each had a small cottage in the woods.  They each had an exact replacement cost of 100 dollars.  Over time, they noticed on average, 1 of the 10 homes burned down due to forest fire.  Each owner needed to have 100 dollars saved up in case their house burned.  This 100 dollars could not be used for investment or buying food.  Therefore, the community had 1000 dollars that was stagnant.  Then one smart guy came along and said, "what if we all throw 10 dollars into the pot an whosever house burns that year.  Now, the community can release 900 dollars into the local economy.  That is the decentralization of risk.

The key is that 1. each house must have the same replacement cost, each house must have the exact probability of being lost by the exact same peril.  3. The probability of the peril must be known and must be the same for all people participating in the pool.  Otherwise, someone is subsidizing someone else in some way.  To solve this problem, reinsurance mutualizes these mutuals in the exact same way.

The problems is not the concept of insurance, it is almost impossible to find pools large enough to with all of these criteria to cover the risks that they face.  So they start diversifying risks, a pool of houses in a flood plain would balance a pool of houses in a fire zone as long as the numbers work.  Or a tornado in the spring can balance blizzards in the winter.   

As you can imagine, and especially with so much money at stake, transparency can get a little thin.  Further, the insurance company does not really care if your house is going to explode settling on the gas line, they only care that the risk is priced correctly.  They have little motivation to eliminate risk.  So yes, there are problems with insurance, but not the problems that you suspect.  These can be corrected with engineers operating on a blockchain. 


 

6
Thanks everyone - I'm looking forward to hearing more.  The paper sets up a bullet proof analysis that pretty much implied that they're barking up the wrong tree with Banks. 

For xeroc, I guess the point is 24/7 trading what?  funds?  At some point that needs to represent something in physical in time and space.    That's exactly where the logic crumbles in cryptoville, in my opinion.  But we can fix that.

7
Abstract: The hallmark of a great society is the ability to capitalize it’s needs, not it’s arbitrage opportunities.  The Highest and Best Use for Blockchain Technology must be to reduce the cost of capital by decentralizing risk, not necessarily money…yet

http://www.ingenesist.com/highest-best-use-blockchain-technology/

This is basically the introduction and conclusion to a 6500 word whitepaper that will be published in the NAIC Quarterly Journal June 2016.  It will also evolve to become a position paper by the NSPE Fintech Task force.  I'd like to make it "bitshares" friendly.  Looking for ideas, comments, or questions.  Thanks.

8
General Discussion / Re: Poor Man's Patent
« on: April 25, 2016, 06:34:12 pm »
OK, excellent... Blocksign is the perfect demo for this tech.  Thank you deeply.


9
General Discussion / Re: Poor Man's Patent
« on: April 21, 2016, 10:14:25 pm »
That sounds promising.  Does it exist?  This seems like a fairly straight forward request - like the first thing that blockchain would have been used for.  So an application should exist, true? 

10
General Discussion / Re: Poor Man's Patent
« on: April 19, 2016, 06:51:00 pm »
Thanks for the comments. Indeed we want to "do it". 

"Poor Man's Patent" is just a way to describe the functionality that we need in a simple way.  Actually, this application would reside behind the National Society of Professional Engineers membership curtain. Instead of "inventions", they would archive their "stamped" works upon an appropriate ontology on a secure server and the hash of those documents on a blockchain.  Those parts would come later, we just need to prove one step at a time.  No budget now, that's why I need off-the-shelf.  If demonstrable, they would fund, etc.   

Can anyone help mash something together?   

11
General Discussion / Re: Poor Man's Patent
« on: April 18, 2016, 03:00:02 pm »
What about two separate programs; 1. to create the hash and the other, a simple wallet, to load the key?  Does this make sense? 

Thanks

12
General Discussion / Poor Man's Patent
« on: April 17, 2016, 05:08:36 pm »
Hello,

Does anyone know where I can find an off-the-shelf wallet application that can create a hash of a document and store it on the bitshares blockchain? 

Specifically, we are researching Blockchain opportunities for professional engineering Society and want to eventually develop a branded registry for securing engineering works.

Thanks

13
Technical Support / Re: Additional feature(s)
« on: February 13, 2016, 06:40:48 pm »
Thank you for posting this.  We are looking for an application that could support an adjudicated factor where a knowledgable person provides a monetary valuation of a physical object, or a delta value added or subtracted from a nominal value.   The market for that physical object would take into consideration the the adjusting value in their offer price.  More specific, this would be akin to a CarFax for Real Estate that includes a physical inspection and ancillary data by a knowledgeable person (adjudicator) who are the multiple writers to the database.  fees are generated by the owner of the property.  database would be viewable by permission or made public.

14
General Discussion / Re: Hangout w/ Alicia Confirmed
« on: February 07, 2016, 02:04:42 am »
No Problem - let's take the time to drum up a compensation package for her. CNX $ contract, I can pay her for reviewing my whitpaper, OUAP may have some work for her.  Add a Bitshares coin drop and some sec package and she'll be good to go.  Keep in mind, we are investors - we can't expect her to be an investor like ourselves. 

I'll have a chance to fill her in on the NSPE Paper and the Ground Fault, Zertify, Bidpool and other projects in the mean time.   She needs to see the bigger picture to distill into a plan for us. 

Thanks again Fuzzy - feel free to keep talking with her until next hang-out

 

15
General Discussion / Re: Hangout w/ Alicia Confirmed
« on: February 06, 2016, 07:19:54 pm »
I heard from Alicia - she mentioned a hang-out Saturday evening.  What's the word on that?  I'm limited in the evening but I'm also earlier than EST. 

Thanks

Pages: [1] 2 3