vote is shi*t, holder is shi*t?
thanks to item 1.
Voting for refund400k isn't good. Refund400k has caused multiple items in ShirleyDD's newsletter to be factually inacurrate.
3. All UI development has halted due to refund400k: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=27785.msg335107#msg335107
4. Bitshares Decentralized sponsorship worker proposal is de-activated due to refund400k, a severe loss of marketing opportunity.
5. Steemfest worker proposal is not active. Given how refund400k effectively cancelled the other two conferences without notice, you shouldn't promote this as a sure thing.
It doesn't appear that the true damaging effects/consequences of refund400k are being fully communicated, especially with this 'newsletter' being fully unaware of the above.
I don't think it is not good.
I think the holder has the right and ability to decide which worker is good for them.
Now i only can see many of you think the holder is foolish and short-sighted.
The worker was voted in and out which was very normal, the holder didn't give a promise for that.
The worker fund shouldn't only come from the reserve pool,it should also come from donation or other way.
Let we check BTC, LTC...., maybe except XRP.
I checked the history of blockchain,found:
DEX: BTS-BITCNY/BITUSD
PAY TO WORKER BITCNY/BITUSD
DEX:BITCNY/BITUSD-BTS
SEND BTS TO CEX
CEX: BTS-BITCOIN
??