In this post Stan suggest it is possible NXT (and/or other interested coin) and BTS2.0 to co-exist on a single blockchain.Which post?
In this post Stan suggest it is possible NXT (and/or other interested coin) and BTS2.0 to co-exist on a single blockchain.Which post?
Assuming NXT or other coin is interested, how is this gonna work? what are the next steps, conditions etc.
i have a feeling bts is about to explode any day now... its the right time to put the TPS news out there.
i have a feeling bts is about to explode any day now... its the right time to put the TPS news out there.
Yes. The chart for the past several months looks like a huge cup and handle. And even that handle looks like a mini cup and handle. :)
I feel like BTS should be over 2 cents already. When Darkcoin (aka Dash) did that rebrand and came out with "instant" transactions and masternodes, its price went up a ton. BTS just came out advertising stats that are WAYYY better than that, and will support 100000 TPS at a time when Bitcoin's major problem is this blocksize/TPS issue that no one can get consensus on.
And BTS is still massively oversold from that absurd decline of the past few months.
We are on the verge of an enormous rise. I've got another 100k purchase coming as soon as I receive some coinbase BTC. I just hope its in time.
In this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.msg11570492#msg11570492
Stan suggest it is possible NXT (and/or other interested coin) and BTS2.0 to co-exist on a single blockchain.
Assuming NXT or other coin is interested, how is this gonna work? what are the next steps, conditions etc. Is such blockchain gonna have 2 tokens, or just one NXTBTS2.0 ?
In this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.msg11570492#msg11570492
Stan suggest it is possible NXT (and/or other interested coin) and BTS2.0 to co-exist on a single blockchain.
Assuming NXT or other coin is interested, how is this gonna work? what are the next steps, conditions etc. Is such blockchain gonna have 2 tokens, or just one NXTBTS2.0 ?
Here is my (completely unsubstantiated) guess as to how it could possibly happen: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/wiki/blacklizard-app-finarch
Basically imagine NXT (or some other coin that may be more open to the idea) becoming a UIA on the BitShares blockchain, but where holders of this special NXT UIA get to elect their own delegates to operate their own independent DPOS-based chain which is still able to (via a majority of the elected delegates agreeing) interact with the assets on the main BitShares chain. They get to use the BitShares BitAssets, charge fees (e.g. in BitUSD) for the transactions that occur as part of their app or DAC, and they can even distribute some of these collected fees (after paying operational expenses) to the NXT holders as a dividend.
In this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1084460.msg11570492#msg11570492
Stan suggest it is possible NXT (and/or other interested coin) and BTS2.0 to co-exist on a single blockchain.
Assuming NXT or other coin is interested, how is this gonna work? what are the next steps, conditions etc. Is such blockchain gonna have 2 tokens, or just one NXTBTS2.0 ?
Here is my (completely unsubstantiated) guess as to how it could possibly happen: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/wiki/blacklizard-app-finarch
Basically imagine NXT (or some other coin that may be more open to the idea) becoming a UIA on the BitShares blockchain, but where holders of this special NXT UIA get to elect their own delegates to operate their own independent DPOS-based chain which is still able to (via a majority of the elected delegates agreeing) interact with the assets on the main BitShares chain. They get to use the BitShares BitAssets, charge fees (e.g. in BitUSD) for the transactions that occur as part of their app or DAC, and they can even distribute some of these collected fees (after paying operational expenses) to the NXT holders as a dividend.
i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
Sorry but isn't it more likely that BTS would be re-implemented in NXT? Not trying to start a flamewar here, just saying they DO have this... http://nxt.org/about/monetary-system/
The main reason I prefer BTS to NXT is the solid pegging mechanism and yield interest on bitUSD.
I know more than a handful of others that feel pretty much the same way.
If bitUSD is changing, then it changes the whole value proposition in my mind. Nevertheless that pegging mechanism is essential to widespread adoption. The yield is admittedly secondary, but I would hold a whole lot less bitUSD if there wasn't a good yield.
Thanks for the info guys, it's helpful!
Sorry but isn't it more likely that BTS would be re-implemented in NXT?
i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
this
Sorry but isn't it more likely that BTS would be re-implemented in NXT? Not trying to start a flamewar here, just saying they DO have this... http://nxt.org/about/monetary-system/
The main reason I prefer BTS to NXT is the solid pegging mechanism and yield interest on bitUSD.
I know more than a handful of others that feel pretty much the same way.
If bitUSD is changing, then it changes the whole value proposition in my mind. Nevertheless that pegging mechanism is essential to widespread adoption. The yield is admittedly secondary, but I would hold a whole lot less bitUSD if there wasn't a good yield.
Thanks for the info guys, it's helpful!
I am implementing at in the first bitcoin based clone the only oned that exists are in java.. perhaps once I do this then bts team can check out the source in c++ and port over to bitshares 2.0.i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
this
+5% +5%
Amen. BTW, Beyond Bitcoin (https://beyondbitcoin.org/qora-decentralized-web-and-blogs/) will be doing a show in the coming weeks with Vrontis from Qora, vbcs from Qora/CIYAM, Ian Knowles from CIYAM and cass (see above) from CIYAM/BitShares.
I am implementing at in the first bitcoin based clone the only oned that exists are in java.. perhaps once I do this then bts team can check out the source in c++ and port over to bitshares 2.0.i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
this
+5% +5%
Amen. BTW, Beyond Bitcoin (https://beyondbitcoin.org/qora-decentralized-web-and-blogs/) will be doing a show in the coming weeks with Vrontis from Qora, vbcs from Qora/CIYAM, Ian Knowles from CIYAM and cass (see above) from CIYAM/BitShares.
Im working with ian and vasilis (vbcs)
I am implementing at in the first bitcoin based clone the only oned that exists are in java.. perhaps once I do this then bts team can check out the source in c++ and port over to bitshares 2.0.i would personally like qora to join, bc of AT and their blockchain hosted web pages. or something that complements with our DNS/Voting projects, that would make sense. Which ones do you know that could fill those requirements?once every coin implements AT then you have true DEX between all the coins using ACCT.
this
+5% +5%
Amen. BTW, Beyond Bitcoin (https://beyondbitcoin.org/qora-decentralized-web-and-blogs/) will be doing a show in the coming weeks with Vrontis from Qora, vbcs from Qora/CIYAM, Ian Knowles from CIYAM and cass (see above) from CIYAM/BitShares.
Im working with ian and vasilis (vbcs)
lel, I read the first sentence and was ready to reply with, "you should talk to CIYAM". ;)
i have a feeling bts is about to explode any day now... its the right time to put the TPS news out there.
Yes. The chart for the past several months looks like a huge cup and handle. And even that handle looks like a mini cup and handle. :)
I feel like BTS should be over 2 cents already. When Darkcoin (aka Dash) did that rebrand and came out with "instant" transactions and masternodes, its price went up a ton. BTS just came out advertising stats that are WAYYY better than that, and will support 100000 TPS at a time when Bitcoin's major problem is this blocksize/TPS issue that no one can get consensus on.
And BTS is still massively oversold from that absurd decline of the past few months.
We are on the verge of an enormous rise. I've got another 100k purchase coming as soon as I receive some coinbase BTC. I just hope its in time.
Yup I've already worked out a design need to implement.. hopefully it will give an idea of how to implement and get picked up by bitshare devs. I will try to keep it a seperate c++ lib so it can be reusable in any c++ project.