We decided to kill PTS and integrate the value of PTS into BTS, and now you told us that you support the reborn PTS just as you support PLAY and MUSIC? Funny...
Please post a link to where we decided any such thing.
The concept of merging PTS and AGS was brought up as a
proposal for discussion but the idea of such a merger did not reach consensus. The whole discussion lasted but a few days and the idea was abandoned, as many are after strongly opposing community input. Several other ideas were vigorously discussed.
After another week of consideration, the final official
decision was to do a slightly unusual sharedrop on PTS/AGS as described in the October newsletter
which documented that decision and explained our reasoning. We indicated at that time that PTS and AGS would remain unchanged by us and might have utility for third party developers. Our exact words were:
"They also remain compelling demographics for third party developers to target in their share drops."
The net affect was that BM would henceforth be free to meet his duty to produce value for holders of PTS and AGS by focusing on growing BTS. That was the reason for honoring the PTS and AGS demographics who had acquired their positions with expectations of participating in all future BM efforts.
Meanwhile, BM has indicated a desire to make DevShares a test bed useful for a wide cross-section of DPOS developers. Hence, we chose to honor the wider group of demographics to
maximize the number of people with a stake in its success.
This is the main essential purpose of a share drop. "Fairness" ends when a group gets their 10%. After that, it's all about
maximizing the union of all relevant demographics.