Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitsapphire

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21
31
Next time do equity crowd-fund with % of referral-profit as dividends. ^^

That's actually the plan now. We need a KYC solution for that first though to do it legally. That's where the first version of Moonstone will come into play. We'll make the next version of Moonstone possible with the first version. I think that has something beautiful to it.

32
Hello there!
We would like to thank all those who have donated to the Moonstone Wallet fundraising campaign.



We were able to reach 23,027 USD of our planned 130.000 USD fundraiser goal. Instead of releasing both the frontend and backend under the MIT license (meaning that anybody would have had the right to use our code also for for-profit reasons), now the Moonstone Angular frontend will be released under GPL3 which can still be used for non-for-profit purposes. The backend which makes the light client possible remains closed source. We plan on releasing our APIs to the public so you will be able to build great apps on top of our API infrastructure!

Nonetheless, the wallet will be released soon and we will continue its further development.
The Moonfund tokens you have received for your donation will be bought back as planned with Bitshares 2.0 worker funds. Fortunately, Bitshares 2.0 will make this even simpler.

33
We're getting an official announcement ready for today. Everything is on track. Thanks for your continued interest! :)

34
I set up an account at https://moonstone.io/ for the Moonstone crowdfunding campaign when I donated. Do I use that account info when seting up the wallet at http://app.moonstone.io/
This version is for UI/UX testing only. You don't need to import anything. We will send out emails once the final version of Moonstone is ready for regular usage.

35
Sign up doesn't work!!!
Please report the issues via the Google form. We need as much feedback from as many testers on different platforms as possible! The devs get every Google form report directly.

36
Hello everybody!

Thank you for your great patience! It's been an incredible past couple of weeks for our team as so many good things have happened.

We are pleased to announce that the community can play around with the dummy UI of the Moonstone wallet here http://app.moonstone.io/. Please note that this is still a very rough version of what we are working on as we had to take out quite some code which connects up to the backend which we want to open source through our crowdfunder. Most of the data is seeded and is not real and is only there for visual purposes. The account you create will be reset once the official beta starts. This demo is simply intended for everybody to have an idea of what the user's experience will be when using Moonstone.

Please send us any feedback via our online form!

In other good news:
  • We participted in the Singapore DBS Blockchain Hackathon and won first place (read here and here)! Taulant from our team teamed up with the great guys from Onebit (thanks fuzzy for getting us in touch!). It was an amazing experience with lots of great contacts in the industry created. This victory is already opening up a lot of doors.
  • We have officially partnered with the Factom project to deliver blockchain based identity verification services. The "blockchain of blockchains" approach we have pitched in Singapore is effectively the same concept and has been presented by other teams in whitepapers just days after our Singapore win. This has been the number one technical request for KYC purposes for all kinds of gateways.

We want to thank Bytemaster for disclosing to us parts of the upcoming Bitshares announcement as it made it possible for us to make an informed decision on how to continue the project and crowdfunder. For everybody else we can say this much: We have experience with quite some blockchain technologies, so we can say without any hesitation that the upcoming announcement is going to be incredible. We are pumped!

37
We also got some great news!
Factom and bitsapphire teamed up to create an Identity Management System for the Moonstone Wallet.
"Bitsapphire will be creating a new level of KYC for their Moonstone crypto wallet. It will allow users to transfer and trade among Bitcoin, BitAssets, User-Issued Assets, and other tokens. It will be available in the next 6-12 months with customer identification via the Factom protocol."
You can check this link for more information: http://blog.factom.org/post/118735295389/fun-new-things-happening-at-factom

38
You don't need to do that - you can just type in your bitshares account name (on metaexchange.info), pay with BTC and the MOONFUND will be sent directly to your bitshares account.
Thanks for that. It is really simple as it should be.
This makes me wonder why this straightforward approach has not been used on moonstone.io. Why all this hassle with creating and downloading a json file and then importing it into a wallet if the same result can be accomplished in one simple metaexchange transaction?
Unless I'm missing something.
You miss that people may want to join funding that DO NOT have an account yet .. :)

Btw .. moonstine.io uses metaexchange for this internally
That's a good point.
So on their webpage they should say: "If you already have a BitShares account go to metaexchange where you can buy our tokens with BTC. If you don't - proceed to our crowdfunding gateway and you will be able to import the downloaded the json file into our new wallet once it is released."
(Please note that I'm not complaining, I'm just trying to help them raise the funds.)

Thank you for your suggestion, Jakub.
We added this information on https://moonstone.io/

39
I appreciate the moonstone project a lot and I'm willing to donate.
Here is my feedback regarding the crowdfunding process:

1. It would be good if you placed this valuable link https://marvelapp.com/a31d7h#3555223 in a more exposed place - in my opinion this link is much more informative than the product demo in the form of a mute YouTube video.

2. When I am trying to donate I am asked to supply a password, a new wallet is created and I'm instructed to download it and keep to safe but there is no explicit guide how to use the new wallet. I guess I could figure it out on my own but it would be much better if I didn't have to. What is badly needed is a step by step guide what to do with the new wallet apart from keeping it safe, i.e. how to access the downloaded wallet and see the purchased Moonstone Tokes.

3. Currently the donation mechanism is not working - when I try to donate I get stuck with the message "Loading Bitcoin address" and nothing happens.

Thank you for your feedback!

1. For the first suggestion, yes, we could do that! But we are going to release the Demo version of the Moonstone Wallet next week, and that will replace the Marvelapp.
2. After we release the demo version, you will be able to use it, test it, and “play” around with it. As for the “step by step guide”, I don’t think that would be necessary( unless the community wants for it be implemented - after they have used the Moonstone Wallet demo firsthand)
3. We tested the “Donate” button and it’s working fine! If you could take a screenshot of the problem, and send it to us, we would more than appreciate it!

Hopefully we could be of any help to you!

40
Hello there!

In this Youtube video we have answered most of the questions you have about the Moonstone wallet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhyyZmiNPn4
You can also listen to it at Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/bitsapphire/sound

For any other questions related to the Moonstone wallet, you can ask them here: https://moonstone.io/faq.php#contact and we will answer them as soon as possible!

41
Once we stabilize the rules of the game and the client, I will definitely make a lot of meetups and hopefully will bring new people (some very wealthy I hope) in the system...
But as the situation stands right now I I don't know the final rules and I don't like misleading people.. I believe in the future of Bitshares no matter what because I believe that the Devs and BM are honest with good intentions and many people in this community want to make BTS the next best thing without carrying only for their profits. I do not want to convince people jumping in the system because of my beliefs but rather inform them properly based on proven results.

We will eventually get there..

Quote of the day. Thank you for the encouragement! I think we all need that from time to time here :)

42
How does this system transition in the as the feed price starts out entirely exogenous and tends toward entirely endogenous as market liquidity increases? i.e can it cope with a environment where the feed price is dominated by internal market forces?

Monsterer, good question, but do we even know that endogenous price feeds are possible? To believe this is more than just BitShares folklore, somebody needs to put forward for review a coherent plan for the mechanics of such a system, and then show how it would apply to the proposed BitAsset 3.0, which on reflection is just as reliant on the price feed as the Market Yield System.

The price feed is a ratio. The ratio is the unit of account. Today this unit of account is generated exogenously to the blockchain. If sufficient fiat IOUs are traded on the internal exchange, then the same unit of account can be created internally through the free market. The bitAssets and any other blockchain endogenous contract can then use it as a datapoint.

The only thing wrong with bytemaster's original no-feed hypothesis is that the ratio cannot start with BTS shorting/longing but needs external IOU tokens to trade against. Otherwise it would be like a self-chained bike.

43
Bitshares gateways operate in the same manner. Gateway IOUs are credit, they are not supposed to be fungible. In Bitshares' case you have bts and bitusd for that.

44
General Discussion / Re: Privatizing BitAssets
« on: April 20, 2015, 12:56:13 pm »
It has been suggested before that BitAssets with feeds produced by private parties would enable greater variety of BitAssets to be created.   I would like to explore this idea further from the perspective of growing adoption.   

Today there is little incentive to market BitUSD because 100% of the profits of marketing BitUSD go to USD holders via yield or BTS holders via trading fees.  If BitUSD were a privately owned asset then the manager of that asset (responsible for publishing the price feed) could make money directly proportional to adoption.  Assume the manager got to set the market trading fees/transfer fees just like they can with any other user issued asset.

The end result would be a financial incentive to get a pegged asset released, marketed, and adopted.   The BTS network would profit by having the asset trading against BTS and other assets.   Initially this would result in a handful of attempts, but market competition would result in the best promoted and adopted variant having the highest usage and deepest markets.   Ultimately the market would settle on one or two variants and the rest would die off or be special purpose.   

1) Assume anyone could create a BitAsset and publish a feed for it.
2) Assume that "anyone" could be a group of 100+ individuals which are unlikely to collude and they must agree on the feed via multi-sig.
3) Assume that this group got to set the trading fees (%) on all trading volume with the asset.

So the question is, are delegates inherently more trustworthy than any other group of individuals collaborating to publish a trusted feed?   Sure they are elected, but an election is not the only or even the best way to establish trust.   

So I contend that a market full of private market pegged assets with profit motive for a near "winner takes all" on the team that can provide the highest liquidity and best marketed variant will produce better results than relying on socialized funding of the BitAssets produced by delegates. 

Thoughts?

I am not a lawyer but...

I believe that doing this would consolidate and centralize the market rapidly into the hands of a few well heeled players.  The appeal of bitUSD would diminish quickly as any properly incorporated entity with the resources to pull this off would immediately be subject to AML/KYC regulations and would be forced to lock down the bitUSD holdings of anyone the IRS asked them to.   

Assuming that they could sustain the compliance burden, they would also find themselves immediately subject to US laws regarding virtual currency & money transmission.  http://www.fincen.gov/financial_institutions/msb/msb.registration.html (click the links labeled Regulation & FactSheet)

If they didn't comply then FinCEN could seize the company's assets globally, pretty much immediately. 

Doing it without incorporation, for instance as a DAC would mean that in theory, USA courts would disregard the DAC and treat the players as individuals who were operating a series of sole-props and engaging in a regulated activity (money transmission and investing/banking).  100% of the liability would likely rest with the players severally and I have serious doubts that the USA wouldn't treat everyone in the market under RICO statutes and seize their individual assets and likely their personages.

In short, if you want to do this, don't live anywhere near the USA and don't expect to be able to board an airplane any time in the near future. ;)

Other than that it's a great idea!

It seems this will be one of the primary reasons why all privatized bitAssets absolutely require whitelisting. However, because you don't actually issue IOUs backed by actual fiat, I think coinbase-style expansion into more jurisdictions should be a lot faster.

45
So what does MOONFUND really give you?

The MOONFUND tokens have value because they will be bought back in terms of BTS in the future through Moonstone delegate income.

Besides the potential profit motive you also help the Bitshares application ecosystem get kickstarted as startups rarely have the funding or time to develop the lower level stack. We want to make higher level service oriented startups easier to build.


Remind me again. What is the plan for the Moonfund donors in the unlikely scenario that you do not meet your goal of 130K USD? How if at all do you plan to make such sponsors/donors whole?

Is it again the same principle - try to get N delegates elected and buy the Moonfund token at 1 BTS a piece? Or will those donations be treated as no string attached tips and no attempt will be made to pay them back?


PS
Do not get me wrong... I love Moonstone (as well as the Moon and The Stones), but just trying to decide on most appropriate trading strategy for my moonfund tokens. And for that I need clarity on the rules.

This so hard.  I haven't donated yet because it's unclear to me how this whole thing is going to be handled.

If we don't reach our goal then we will make just the frontend open source under the more restrictive GPL3 license and keep the backend closed source. 3rd party applications will still be able to use our backend in a trust-less manner very similar to how Chain works. The Bitshares startup ecosystem will in our opinion still profit from this, but open source is always better in our opinion.

Regardless of whether we reach our goal or not, the wallet will be released and all transactions going through our servers will ask for the pre-set (but opt-out) delegate list. We will continue with the buybck of all MOONFUND tokens in the market as planned even if we don't reach our goal.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 21