I'm not RippleXiaoShan . If any admin wants , I can confirm where I'm at , Which country I'm at , not just by ip ADDRESS , but also the view from my house .

I suppose RippleXiaoshan is in Canada . Well ,  I'm not .

As for the privacy part , US Supreme Court had established that a person should have "reasonable expectation of pricacy" , so a QQ group advertised
on this forum to joint and only validate three words ----- BTS to enter can not be considered as a private room instead of a open places .

I performed multiple test on this subject -----  Only enter some simple validation like --- BTS , Please , I want in , like your style ....   You can enter this QQ group . So there will be no reasonable expectation of privacy in the eyes of the US legal system . Anything you said on such a QQ group , if it fits a crime , the police or the federal government don't even need a legal warrant to obtain that information and use it against you .

Is that clear ? Don't fight me on this , we both know you don't have the expertise .

Nice ......
I would love to use your help in the future.
很好，我以后会很高兴使用你的帮助的。

But , about this post , I've raised that opinion once before .... but it seems that China is the only few countries that did not have hard restriction on crypto currency yet , so although I want the balance of crypto shift out of China , it's not that easy . It would be a difficult journey .

But , we can still hope , right ?

Quote from: Riverhead on November 01, 2014, 11:34:24 am

Have you done the math? My current remuneration for the hours I've spent maintaining a delegate: frequent releases, vps costs and setup, helping other delegates get up and running, maintaining price feeds, etc. Has so far been around $2 a month. At one point during the high price days I almost cleared $4 a month.

If that is greedy than I'm not sure what to say.

Keep in mind this is all open source. If you feel this strongly you can clone the project and make your own DAC with no dilution. The hard part will be finding the staff that'll work for transaction fees.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

If you think you have a big loss as delegate, please give up the delegate position！Ok？I will serve btsx holders for free！
In nature， you donot take the delegate as the honorary role！

Nothing is more dangerous than someone in a financial system who has great power claiming that "he does not need money , just serve the people ".

Because a pure good person like that would have go to the third world country and help the poor people already instead of playing a major role in a financial system .

Quote from: Frodo on October 31, 2014, 10:26:54 pm

I think dilution is already the fairest way to raise funds. Simple donations put donors at a disadvantage where as dilution adds or takes the same value per share for everybody. That means that every stakeholder, despite the amount he holds, is incentivized to vote in such a way that value per share is maximized. One can't harm others without harming oneself and oneself can't gain without letting others gain.

This is no guarantee for good decisions but as already stated you have always the possibility to hedge in- or outside the system.

Nope！ dilution for raising funds？ dilution for delegates!!! At least, the benefit from dilution shall not be  only for delegates!

在正常情况下，25个受托人才有100%支付率，如果超过了这个数目，股东会发现通胀率太大，对股价影响太大，最终否决超过25个受托人以上的席位。
所以大部分受托人都是3-5%左右的支付率才能有机会被股东选上，除非是核心程序员和核心市场推广团队。支付率的意思是，通胀支付你一定的百分比，然后剩余的直接销毁。如果100%就是没销毁，如果3%就是要销毁97%。

你之前想的是101受托人都能拿一样的高收入吧？多虑了。实际年通胀率一般在1-2%左右，如果是25个左右的100%支付率受托人。

Quote from: bytemaster on October 31, 2014, 07:52:40 pm

Quote from: trader on October 31, 2014, 07:05:42 pm

Its 2021:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply

Great... an enshrined constitution that stipulates an dilution rate strictly less than BTC's inflation rate would "tie our hands" and should be carefully considered, but from a marketing perspective there is a strong case.

You are changing almost all essential elements in the original consensus!!!
If the original consensus allows the dilution rate, I am sure that most holders did not buy btsx shares in the past! Particularly, the benefit caused by the future dilution will be not for minority shareholders， but only for delegates ! Now I cann't see at all  the meaning of decentralization. Your opinion is just the decision! right? That's the reason why some chinese are asking for the help of the authority to forbid btsx trades on BTC38!

Just one reminder ..... If people know Bitcoin market 's money will be sucked by the miners on a daily basis and more than the value the system can provide  , would the ordinary common sense people still bought Bitcoin at 1000 USD ? 

Bitcoin did not change it's protocol , but in fact it has been changed from Satoshi's vision ----every one can mine .

will the final version of this Newsletter add any words or sentence ?

I support multiple dacs in the community, I just cannot work on multiple dacs.

And if someone managed to keep PTS and DNS going after 11.5  , will they have your blessing ?