Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - digitalindustry

Pages: 1 [2] 3
16
Marketplace / Re: [Sell] 100 PTS @ 0.018
« on: November 18, 2013, 06:35:00 am »
I have sent and it looks like the trans has confirmed .


17
Marketplace / Re: [Sell] 100 PTS @ 0.018
« on: November 18, 2013, 05:55:57 am »
No problem I am happy to send first , especially to one such as yourself.

18
Marketplace / Re: [Sell] 100 PTS @ 0.018
« on: November 18, 2013, 05:36:15 am »
I will pm you soon .

19
Marketplace / [Sell] 100 PTS @ 0.018 [CLOSED]
« on: November 18, 2013, 03:59:58 am »
might hold on to a few more as there seems to be upward pressure on PTS with BTC.

so 100 up for sale .

20
General Discussion / Re: unSystem & Invictus Innovations
« on: November 17, 2013, 05:24:31 pm »
I mean i want to be clear ha ha ,


the promos seem to sell fear and intimidation by the government , to what> ? get people to load a plug-in in a browser ha ha .

I think maybe we need to look closer at the sociological effects of the information vector that surround the cryptocurrency environment , as you will find if you run that equation , you will come to a "collision" of ideas .

i hope it is clear what i'm saying , we are back to our "principal of multidimensional continuance" paradox.

to break that down further :

You can't sell me fear base on a cryptocurrency environment, because that shows a misunderstanding of the principals of information #1 it also shows a misunderstanding of the principals of flow #2 and to following up its is paradoxical in terms when understanding the principals of political power.


so you need to go back to the DAC drawing board. <at least just on these issues. ^^

21
General Discussion / Re: unSystem & Invictus Innovations
« on: November 17, 2013, 05:14:29 pm »
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bitcoin-dark-wallet

ha ha can we say  "honey pot"

: D ahh i mean what a great idea !

hey its none of my business lol

22
Marketplace / Re: [WTB] 10,000 PTS for 0.014 btc/pts
« on: November 17, 2013, 05:05:30 pm »
500 @ 0.018

23
may be able to 0.018

which is around 8.29$ in the old language or around 57.69 CNY

which for you if you want to take advantage of arbitrage is a good deal as you would have to believe that this, right now , on only these exchanges is the absolute top of this currency ?

which i expect we all understand or believe is not the case.

so unless a better offer comes in soon from our free market out there I'll tentatively agree to this , if you do of course.

24
Thanks

25
No reserve , auction ends when fiat banking system collapses , or I accept an offer.

26
Can do escrow or you send first , if you dont know me we can do it back at BCT.org .

Post your offers here  in whatever currency you like.

No fiat thanks.

27
General Discussion / Re: $5000 Bounty - Momentum Proof-of-Work Hacking
« on: November 11, 2013, 05:50:45 am »

CPU only miner would definitely help cryptos at a lot of levels. Hopefully those who can help do so!

I completely agree.



I also have a few ideas on how the momentum algorithm can be salvaged, but I'd like to work directly with the developers on the topic if possible.
If one of the Invictus staff could drop me a PM, it would be much appreciated.

+1

Great work .

AnonyMint I hope you step up to this you will benifit everyone will .

28
General Discussion / Re: $5000 Bounty - Momentum Proof-of-Work Hacking
« on: November 11, 2013, 04:07:50 am »
If this is the case and it is confirmed - I have one last question

AnonyMint and gigawatt :

will you know help  bytemaster either implement a more effective code ?

though either 

1. forking this design and continuing

or

2. reissuing a new design

for the correct incentives would you both be willing to contribute - I think Anony its time to realize the single persons don't create cryptocurrencies , its a community effort.

I couldn't see why those incentives wouldn't include a payment in the  currency itself .

I think its time to step up - clearly the community likes the idea of something new and innovative -

29
General Discussion / Re: $5000 Bounty - Momentum Proof-of-Work Hacking
« on: November 11, 2013, 04:01:31 am »
I tested gigawatts implementation.

14.33 collisionspermin instead of 180 collisionspermin stock client, 32 threads.

The point is that gigawatts algorithm could yield a GPU implementation which could be a 100x faster version of a slower algorithm, with a net gain.

But I will try to change the memory requirements and see what happens on the CPU if we bring it down to using very little memory.

What were you using for CHAIN_LENGTH?

I've been running a test with CHAIN_LENGTH = 2 on a 1 CPU/1GB test box overnight and got this:
http://i.imgur.com/wknTeLb.png

If I try to run the default implementation, it crashes because it requires too much memory.  However, on a 2 CPU/2 GB test box running only one thread, I get around 2.2 hpm.  However, I need to rerun these tests because the hashperminute calculation was updated with a recent commit.


I've also updated the source code: http://pastebin.com/VTCMFQXg
It now uses the thread interruption from the recent commit and makes debug messages optional.


To compile: Pull the source from the main github branch, then take my code and overwrite momentum.cpp with it.  Compile as normal.

hey thanks - silly me i was :

g++ -o mpow_1 mpow_1.cpp

i renamed it duh ....

cheers - interesting just to see ..

so i was thinking and was going to ask, but it looks like its been answered - an implementation like this would be up to 100x efficient because of the ability to scale .  then run parallel.

30
Great !  I don't have control of the wallet atm but I'll tip pts !

Pages: 1 [2] 3