0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
One of my largest peeves on this forum has been people taking the statements of a single person and extrapolating it to the whole community. Repeatedly. Some manage to take this even further ...
HI guys. I am new here because I found bitshares in August last year and invested two months ago (almost all of my savings in bts). Bts is one of best projects I ever saw (ex stock exchange employee, now just sniffing and investing in crypto). Must say that community is full of hate and it is the ONLY thing that pulls you down. Here in forum you sound like a bunch of 15 year old guys on a half time, having 2:0 score and arguing was there a penalty possibility in 42nd minute or not. Can you just swallow your pride, engage "not giving a fuck mode" and kick some ass again? Go grab a beer and enjoy this beautiful project. None of you is fault, every single one contributed abnormaly in development and there is so big perspective in this that I really cannot belive with my eyes.Good luck to you with my hope that you will understand what I am saying here.. You are the best!
Reading the thread it seems like some holders and developers are leaving. jl777 is one of them.
Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 25, 2016, 07:11:57 amMeh, I'm not done here.The funny thing is.... you guys are "smart enough to know Litecoin was dying wayyyyy before I did," but you're not smart enough to see that Bitshares is dying. Now, THAT is funny.BTW, I never said you were new to crypto. I said your account was "relatively new" (IIRC) but did not check my memory was shown to be wrong. I made a correction in that post.Who is deluded here? Really? ... No one here said they knew LTC was dying before you, just that it isn't some brilliant insight into CCs. Why do you think people want to fork and try TonyK's idea? It isn't because they think BitShares is going to the moon. Again... your thoughts are so inconsistent. It makes it hard to listen to you, because you never put forth ideas.. just ALL over the map. It is always nonsense like the above.
Meh, I'm not done here.The funny thing is.... you guys are "smart enough to know Litecoin was dying wayyyyy before I did," but you're not smart enough to see that Bitshares is dying. Now, THAT is funny.
Quote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 06:46:07 am.....Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.400Whatever. I spend hours... daily... for 4 years researching cryptocurrencies. Then you armchair experts try to play like you're experts. You spend way too much time on these forums. You should branch out into the rest of the cryptocurrency community and see how deluded everyone is here. Thanks for the underhanded compliment douchenozzle.
.....
Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 25, 2016, 06:55:02 amQuote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 06:46:07 am.....Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.4002014. Such controversy. I was after Charlie in early 2013 ... and that was too late.
Quote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 06:46:07 am.....Except I said it back when it was controversial... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=662058.400
Saying that LTC is going nowhere is not some bit of brilliance...
I don't quote mortals much, but when I do:Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 25, 2016, 05:51:14 amThe old adage goes.. you need to spend money to make money I do believe it was the Chinese who proved that particular law at around the same time they were inventing paper and gunpowder, in fact, if it wasn't for that third round of funding following the failed IPO, neither would have been invented. Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 25, 2016, 05:51:14 amI waste too much time coaching you guys though... I will probably end up giving up like I did on ...
The old adage goes.. you need to spend money to make money
I waste too much time coaching you guys though... I will probably end up giving up like I did on ...
My next project, called CoinHodor, will be a fork of NXT 2.O, BitShares 2.O, Crypti 2.O (aka Lisk) and dShares. It will be 15% better than all four, which makes it 60% better overall, by my math.
can someone pull out the good ideas from that thread?
Quote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 05:03:18 amQuote from: TravelsAsia on February 25, 2016, 04:12:56 amHere's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.That is fine and all, but that is not CoinHoarder's mission so he will never do this. He has a relatively new account. I am not coming to his defense, but I don't understand that statement. His account is only a couple months 'newer' than yours - he registered here 600 days ago.
Quote from: TravelsAsia on February 25, 2016, 04:12:56 amHere's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.That is fine and all, but that is not CoinHoarder's mission so he will never do this. He has a relatively new account.
Here's an idea, how about we focus on attacking ideas instead of each other.
Again, you lack reading comprehension. I'm not going to waste my time with an imbecile such as yourself.
You guys are delusional. Check the date on the OP compared to the date of Tony's OP. If anything Tony stole the idea from Nxt. They have been discussing similar ideas for a long time now, this is their most recent design.
While we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.
http://usdplus.co/
You own the network, but who pays for development?
Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 25, 2016, 02:12:57 amQuote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 02:03:27 ambla bla blaAgain, you lack reading comprehension. I'm not going to waste my time with an imbecile such as yourself. Says the guy who doesn't understand the difference between Bitshares 2.0 and TonyK's idea. Everyone be aware of this, when evaluating this guy's opinions.
Quote from: gamey on February 25, 2016, 02:03:27 ambla bla blaAgain, you lack reading comprehension. I'm not going to waste my time with an imbecile such as yourself.
bla bla bla
Their idea is for a dual token system to deal with their forging system. So you have equity in forging. TonyKs idea was never to create more tokens. Just make it so you can't trade BTS outside the DEX. There is little commonality in these ideas.. the fact that you read that into this is quite demonstrative of how out of you are. You are blinded by your FUD mission. I am not going to spend more time on this post. You're a fool. I gave up refuting your nonsense after the first few. Let me dumb it down for you. No one here suggested they stole TonyKs idea!!!!Good luck kid, maybe you can diceroll up another 30-50 IQ points and you can make another appearance as him.
Quote from: gamey on February 24, 2016, 11:11:37 pmQuote from: CoinHoarder on February 24, 2016, 07:12:34 pmYou guys are delusional. Check the date on the OP compared to the date of Tony's OP. If anything Tony stole the idea from Nxt. They have been discussing similar ideas for a long time now, this is their most recent design.You are completely confused and should stop posting until you get it straightened out. Which idea would Tonyk have stole? Who are the "delusional guys" in this thread??But besides that... TonyK's idea is not "BitShares 2.0 mojo".In your goal to manipulate/complain/whatever you have completely confused yourself. Nap it out for a bit, kid. Try again tomorrow. Goodluck.You mad?Irritated at your idiocy.You're definitely an idiot that lacks reading comprehension.Exhibit A: The thread title is "NXT forks Bitshares 2.0 mojo!" which refers to Nxt forking TonyK's idea (considering the link in the OP).BitShares 2.0 is TonyK's idea? Wooah, lemme tell him this one.Exhibit B: Someone claims NXT stole the idea.Quote from: Pheonike on February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pmWhile we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them. This has nothing to do with TonyK's idea. Ok. One guy says they've taken our ideas, but that doesn't equate to 'you guys are delusional. Everyone takes everyone's ideas here.Exhibit C: Someone agrees with Exhibit B.Quote from: xeroc on February 24, 2016, 06:22:46 pmQuote from: Pheonike on February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pmWhile we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.Same procedure as every year ..At least we wont have much money to spend innovating in future Exhibit D: I did not accuse Tonyk of stealing the idea, because of the use of "if anything" and the context surrounding those words. Considering those things, that statement doesn't mean "tonyk stole the idea." It means that it is impossible for NXT to have stolen the idea. Let me dumb it down for you... It is impossible for Nxt to have stolen the dual token idea, because their OP was before Tonyk's OP, and I know (since I am a Nxt investor/supporter) that they have been tossing around this idea for a while. If anyone stole the idea (Nxt or Tonyk) it was Tonyk seeing as their idea was published first.Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 24, 2016, 07:12:34 pmYou guys are delusional. Check the date on the OP compared to the date of Tony's OP. If anything Tony stole the idea from Nxt. They have been discussing similar ideas for a long time now, this is their most recent design.
Quote from: CoinHoarder on February 24, 2016, 07:12:34 pmYou guys are delusional. Check the date on the OP compared to the date of Tony's OP. If anything Tony stole the idea from Nxt. They have been discussing similar ideas for a long time now, this is their most recent design.You are completely confused and should stop posting until you get it straightened out. Which idea would Tonyk have stole? Who are the "delusional guys" in this thread??But besides that... TonyK's idea is not "BitShares 2.0 mojo".In your goal to manipulate/complain/whatever you have completely confused yourself. Nap it out for a bit, kid. Try again tomorrow. Goodluck.
Quote from: Pheonike on February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pmWhile we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.Same procedure as every year ..At least we wont have much money to spend innovating in future
Quote from: betax on February 24, 2016, 11:17:22 pmQuote from: xeroc on February 24, 2016, 06:22:46 pmQuote from: Pheonike on February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pmWhile we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.Same procedure as every year ..At least we wont have much money to spend innovating in futureShame...Where does NXT get the money for innovating? They have no dilution right. Not against diluting for good/profitable development obviously, just slightly ironic/humorous we're attempting to justify dilution for development using a competitor innovating/developing with no dilution
Quote from: xeroc on February 24, 2016, 06:22:46 pmQuote from: Pheonike on February 24, 2016, 06:20:05 pmWhile we are sitting here in a circle jerk arguing about dilution, other people are taken our ideas and running with them.Same procedure as every year ..At least we wont have much money to spend innovating in futureShame...