On the first article about this, they mentioned the word bitshares, but it wasn't our BitShares. Now I see this
IWI: There can’t be a single opinion regarding that matter; however, Dmitri Peskov of Strategic Initiatives Agency once noted that Pavel Medvedev is not just sufficiently qualified, and offered him to have a training course at the agency. Nowadays we may see polar opinions arising and spoken on behalf of various market players and social groups. The Central Bank took a positive view of our initiative. Elvira Nabiullina (chairwoman of the Russian Central Bank – ForkLog) said that the Central Bank was not going to ban cryptotechnology. The bank is researching them now. The Central Bank just needs some time to understand how to regulate that brand new area.
...
QIWI: NXT is a completely different matter, and presently we’re not ready to discuss it. Indeed, we analyzed smart contracts and Ethereum, and keep them within our line of sight, but for now we cannot say whether any of those could underlie bitruble to some extent. Previously we mentioned blockchain technology and BitshareX, and as for now, nothing has changed.
...
QIWI: For now, it’s hard to say whether it becomes a separate project or a QIWI-affiliated enterprise. Currently we are mostly focused on technological components. Eventually, everything is at the regulator’s discretion. Certainly, we are ready to release the project in 2016, but we have to wait for the Central Bank’s reaction; its opinion and vision as to when and how it has to happen is important.
Was that "BitshareX" mentioning our BitShares? The older version? My main curiosity: could this possibly have something to do with the latest article on Forbes mentioning interest from Denmark's and Russian's Central Banks?