This is a short piece from The Economist. It mentions a public ledger for banks. Most importantly, it looks beyond Bitcoin.
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21677198-technology-behind-bitcoin-could-transform-how-economy-works-trust-machine (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21677198-technology-behind-bitcoin-could-transform-how-economy-works-trust-machine)
The Value of Values with Rich Hickey https://youtu.be/-6BsiVyC1kM (https://youtu.be/-6BsiVyC1kM) - great video that explains benefits of the stream of immutable values (facts) vs. more traditional approach of representing knowledge as some current mutable state.I liked that talk .. however, as a Communications Engineer, I disagree with most of his definitions of "Information" :)
Blythe Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Yo8bt8JAU
http://www.wired.com/tag/blockchain/#btstip "mint chocolate chip" 25 BROWNIE.PTS
Blythe Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Yo8bt8JAU
Actually, I am not a fan of the term "distributed ledger" .. simply because every kind digital data can be distributed .. git is a distributed ledger aswell just for code commits/historyBlythe Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Yo8bt8JAU
Wow, how have I not seen this before... Great talk, and the language she uses to describe blockchain technology is... masterful. ;)
distributed ledger technology is the most widely used phrase in her talk I believe.
Thanks for sharing!
Actually, I am not a fan of the term "distributed ledger" .. simply because every kind digital data can be distributed .. git is a distributed ledger aswell just for code commits/historyBlythe Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Yo8bt8JAU
Wow, how have I not seen this before... Great talk, and the language she uses to describe blockchain technology is... masterful. ;)
distributed ledger technology is the most widely used phrase in her talk I believe.
Thanks for sharing!
I'd prefer to distinguish between:
* blockchain as an immutable database of "the past" events
* a protocol that describes how the blockchain "evolves"
The protocol may contain:
* the business model
* a finite state machine for any kind of "data transitions"
* how transactions are interpreted
* how transactions are bundled to a block
* how bundles transactions
if the last question is "decentralized" .. then the protocol also contains a
* distributed conensus finding scheme
Hence, a blockchain has nothing to do with "being decentralized" and only the
"consensus scheme" can be decentralized (assuming the blocks are broadcast
publicly, else it would be a private chain, which can also be decentralized BTW)
Actually, I am not a fan of the term "distributed ledger" .. simply because every kind digital data can be distributed .. git is a distributed ledger aswell just for code commits/historyBlythe Masters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Yo8bt8JAU
Wow, how have I not seen this before... Great talk, and the language she uses to describe blockchain technology is... masterful. ;)
distributed ledger technology is the most widely used phrase in her talk I believe.
Thanks for sharing!
I'd prefer to distinguish between:
* blockchain as an immutable database of "the past" events
* a protocol that describes how the blockchain "evolves"
The protocol may contain:
* the business model
* a finite state machine for any kind of "data transitions"
* how transactions are interpreted
* how transactions are bundled to a block
* how bundles transactions
if the last question is "decentralized" .. then the protocol also contains a
* distributed conensus finding scheme
Hence, a blockchain has nothing to do with "being decentralized" and only the
"consensus scheme" can be decentralized (assuming the blocks are broadcast
publicly, else it would be a private chain, which can also be decentralized BTW)
Since both public and private chains can be decentralized (or maybe more
accurate to say "distributed"), would you say that the main difference lies in
if they are trust-free?
Or private chains just do not let you read the raw
blockchain state? Or is it that the full nodes of a private chain are picked by
a central authority?
Financial institutions are heavy users of today’s database platforms, and those platforms do not enable a shared write scenario. This is what banks are looking for.
Another benefit - private blockchains allow multiple entities to share database in read/write mode http://www.multichain.com/blog/2015/10/private-blockchains-shared-databases/QuoteFinancial institutions are heavy users of today’s database platforms, and those platforms do not enable a shared write scenario. This is what banks are looking for.