It has explicit no ties to BTS except for the sharedrop and shared codebase for initial versions. There might be some indirect benefits since Music will rely on Moonstone initially which will be a BTS wallet as well.

The killer feature bitshares is missing is credibility and trustworthiness. Changing the supply schedule is a cardinal sin and absolutely nothing has been done to legitimize it

Quote

dev-trial.misc.nikolai   This one is funny and I think is an inside joke with Toast. The guy this was intended for is gone, the fees paid off and was supposed be taken offline. But here it is still there banking money.

Wow that's funny and sad if true...

That delegate pays for miscellaneous development tasks useful as a dev evaluation, for example recently a bunch of people wrote tests (some not yet paid), and before that zach lym came to visit and it paid for that.

If you all prefer I take it offline instead of using it for discretionary development tasks then let me know, outside this thread I only got positive feedback on it

Price feeds and forced turnover are different things. You could havr forced turnover without price restrictions. Sounds like you're suggesting it may be sufficient. I don't think so though

You didn't copy over all the keys, but you can probably regenerate them with the command wallet_regenerate_private_keys <account_name> 11000

We were waiting for 0.7.0 because of the network bug. Now that it's out there's no reason to delay. I'll maybe do more test distributions on devshares and then do the real thing before March 25th.

Actually, that's pretty sweet. DoD made tor too

11.5 wams