271
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人又作假了!这样下去怎么可能涨得上来？
« on: April 26, 2019, 02:23:17 pm »
关键是要给喂价定标准，不能瞎喂了。就是不得低于投资者在内盘购买BTS所花费的人民币价格。
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
272
General Discussion / Re: would you support a cheater as the wintess?
« on: April 26, 2019, 10:04:18 am »
The feed price should not be lower than the actual price that investors would pay if they bought BTS in the DEX.
It is now 2% lower.This is an important reason why the recharge rate is too high.
It is now 2% lower.This is an important reason why the recharge rate is too high.
273
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 26, 2019, 09:47:56 am »
喂价不应当低于在内盘购买bts的实际价格。这两天都低了2％以上。这是充值费率高企的主要原因。
274
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 请为代表投资者利益的见证人：ioex 投票
« on: April 25, 2019, 02:25:08 pm »
至少不低于内盘买一价*充值费率。因为这才是内盘实际价格。
275
General Discussion / Re: [Announcement]Change of MCR from 1.75 to 1.6 for bitCNY
« on: April 24, 2019, 12:43:22 pm »
Now is the time when the market needs funds.
I think lowering MCR at this time should be beneficial to the market. On the contrary, lowering MCR when the market is rising may lead bitCNY to devaluation.
I think lowering MCR at this time should be beneficial to the market. On the contrary, lowering MCR when the market is rising may lead bitCNY to devaluation.
276
General Discussion / Re: Which witnesses do not doing well in CNY price feeding?
« on: April 23, 2019, 03:08:24 am »There are many crypto exchanges around the world. They trade many coins and fiat currency, and they charge different fees. For example coinbase charges about .5% to trade and there are withdrawal fees. We can't feed prices based on all the fees that traders pay to acquire a particular coin, it would be impossible to get an accurate feed that way. So this is not how the feed price works or should work:The feed price should be “how much RMB does it cost to buy 1 BTS?”
But ，all along, I have been unable to use RMB to buy BTS at this feed price .It is too low.
(DEX price *bitCNY premium )is the actual price I paid.
It is totally unfair that the feed price is lower than the price I actually paid.
This is ridiculous!
For example，There are two exchanges, one handling fee is 10%, BTS price is 0.9; The other one handling fee is 1%, BTS's price is 1. How to determine the feeding price?0.95?
It is true that there are too many transactions that cannot be counted accurately. should we take the higher one more reasonably?
277
General Discussion / Re: Which witnesses do not doing well in CNY price feeding?
« on: April 23, 2019, 02:42:02 am »
you do realise the prices we publish are not random right?
I could cherry pick a combination of exchange routes from USD -> BTS or CNY -> BTS that result in even lower price or even higher than the ones you mention.
Thats why we take all of them into account.
Don't you think there is no handling charge for such many price changes?All major CEX give you free exchange?
This is why the feed price thus calculated is always surprisingly low.
The feed price should not be lower than the actual price paid by investors to buy a BTS in the DEX market.
In fact, the feed price should take the highest price of several major CEX and DEX, because this is the actual amount of RMB paid by investors.
278
General Discussion / Re: Which witnesses do not doing well in CNY price feeding?
« on: April 22, 2019, 04:34:39 pm »
Is the price of the DEX fake? The daily turnover is tens of millions!
279
General Discussion / Re: Which witnesses do not doing well in CNY price feeding?
« on: April 22, 2019, 04:26:54 pm »
The feed price should be “how much RMB does it cost to buy 1 BTS?”
But ，all along, I have been unable to use RMB to buy BTS at this feed price .It is too low.
(DEX price *bitCNY premium )is the actual price I paid.
It is totally unfair that the feed price is lower than the price I actually paid.
But ，all along, I have been unable to use RMB to buy BTS at this feed price .It is too low.
(DEX price *bitCNY premium )is the actual price I paid.
It is totally unfair that the feed price is lower than the price I actually paid.
280
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 22, 2019, 12:15:56 pm »这帮见证人简直就是把bts往死里整。
推不动，没办法。
提核心开发BSIP，核心开发者也不会关注也不会了解这些是为了什么，其中涉及到的复杂市场博弈他们也很难想明白，从很早之前的回复来看就知道了。
喂价不得低于内盘实际价格，就是喂价不应当低于投资者在内盘买一个bts所付出的人民币的实际数量。完全合理，合情，合规啊！喂价低于这个值就是不合理的啊，喂价应当反应实际价格啊，这有什么难于理解的呢？现实是喂价竟然长期低于实际价格两个点以上，这不是作恶是什么呢？
应当将喂价的底线写入程序，否则这么任由见证人瞎喂，迟早玩完。
281
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 21, 2019, 04:13:03 pm »
这帮见证人简直就是把bts往死里整。
282
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 21, 2019, 03:19:25 pm »这喂价简直无语了，刚才价格反弹竟然喂价还在跌，充值费率2.3竟然喂价又是比内盘成交价还低，明目张胆的害人啊！！
是的，这问题必须解决。
把所有见证人喂价做到K线图里去，把内盘修正价也做到K线图里去，谁胡乱喂价就会一目了然，投票就可以有理有据。
投票有啥用呢，票都在大户那里。这种喂价，降mcr还有啥用呢，喂价插针秒秒钟爆你。喂价不得低于内盘实际价格必须确定下来。
你还真别不信，只要把喂价的荒唐充分可视化出来，我就可以去挨个说服大户投票，把表现不合格的见证人投出去。
可视化当然好了，但是要先把规则定好啊，就是喂价不得低于内盘bts真实价格。否则人家说我用的是平均价，甚至用的是国外小交易对的价格，没错啊。
283
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 21, 2019, 02:13:05 pm »这喂价简直无语了，刚才价格反弹竟然喂价还在跌，充值费率2.3竟然喂价又是比内盘成交价还低，明目张胆的害人啊！！
是的，这问题必须解决。
把所有见证人喂价做到K线图里去，把内盘修正价也做到K线图里去，谁胡乱喂价就会一目了然，投票就可以有理有据。
投票有啥用呢，票都在大户那里。这种喂价，降mcr还有啥用呢，喂价插针秒秒钟爆你。喂价不得低于内盘实际价格必须确定下来。
284
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 见证人喂价分歧这么大，建议加入喂价分歧指数! 现在这种喂价对比真的是让人无言以对!!!
« on: April 21, 2019, 01:11:43 pm »
这喂价简直无语了，刚才价格反弹竟然喂价还在跌，充值费率2.3竟然喂价又是比内盘成交价还低，明目张胆的害人啊！！
285
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 将MSSR降为101
« on: April 21, 2019, 01:04:08 am »
还有一个误区，cny的供应量主要取决于bts的价格，抵押率不是主要原因。在bts价格不涨的情况下提高cny的发行量，有可能造成cny贬值，触发强清。多发的cny又给收回去了。
通过爆仓增加市场流动性的观点是不对的。数字货币上涨靠共识，本来大家共识很好，都不愿意卖，价格应该涨啊。结果系统非要搞个爆仓来强行卖，这么自残的事也只有bts了。
再打个比方，理论上一个币，如果做多的资金超过50％，就应该涨，是吧。而bts呢？在爆仓的加持下，不夸张，空军只要占三成，吊打多军。
控制爆仓才是王道。
通过爆仓增加市场流动性的观点是不对的。数字货币上涨靠共识，本来大家共识很好，都不愿意卖，价格应该涨啊。结果系统非要搞个爆仓来强行卖，这么自残的事也只有bts了。
再打个比方，理论上一个币，如果做多的资金超过50％，就应该涨，是吧。而bts呢？在爆仓的加持下，不夸张，空军只要占三成，吊打多军。
控制爆仓才是王道。
