Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cube

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 94
256
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 05:21:40 am »
bitcube node is up.  Working on seed node next.

Code: [Select]
"1120411ms th_a       application.cpp:820           get_blockchain_synop ] synopsis: ["002400f7711cb44e5d23c06550d38dca546d53f2","002400f85a7d07a722f801b839c75f89a4f55e67"]
1125000ms th_a       witness.cpp:185               block_production_loo ] Generated block #2360867 with timestamp 2016-01-04T05:18:45 at time 2016-01-04T05:18:45
1128339ms th_a       application.cpp:500           handle_block         ] Got block: #2360868 time: 2016-01-04T05:18:48 latency: 344 ms from: xeldal  irreversible: 2360849 (-19)
1"

"head_block_num": 2360866,
  "head_block_id": "0024062220ab51ad1ab52197380aa54b10e4a73e",
  "head_block_age": "1 second old",
  "next_maintenance_time": "41 minutes in the future",
  "chain_id": "4018d7844c78f6a6c41c6a552b898022310fc5dec06da467ee7905a8dad512c8",
  "participation": "67.18750000000000000",


Edit: all nodes updated.

257
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 12:50:35 am »
all nodes stuck.

258
  2.Start selling the collected fees in bitAssets tomorrow...start at 12-15% above feed and lower the price 0.5% every other day...

Yes this makes sense, put all the fee pool bit assets up for sale now at feedprice +15%  and drop it each day until it's all sold.

This can be done now, and is nice and simple. 
more complex ideas will take time and are less likely to get shareholder support.
Agree.
Tony is a genius.

Yes, he is a lovable and helpful person when one sees beyond his spicy surface.  I like that bright idea.

ohh yes, and ask our leading exchange [i.e. storefront]- OpenLedger, why do they insist of behaving like obit-uary writers rather than a serious exchange?

Perhaps their main business is obits (and not exchange)?

259
What do you think would be an acceptable level of pay for providing market maker services? 

Lets say someone was willing to provide 10M BTS to provide a peg for bitUSD on poloniex at 98% and 105%.  Would a worker proposal worth 10k bts per day be enough to incentivise this risk?

It seems that the greatest risk is that you would get stuck short on bitUSD to the tune of 10M bts with no bitUSD available to purchase back. 

I don't have 10M bts, and I realize maker will help to incentivize market making.  I am more just spitballing what we would need to pay someone with that capital to have them risk it. 

In the short term, I think everything we can do to solve our problems without having to rely upon our limited development capital needs to be explored.

Well I guess that would need to be voted on.

Exactly, there's some risk so instead of having someone fund the 10M or even 1M we would all donate a bit. I don't know the level of acceptance it would have but if everyone donated anything from 5 to 20k bts, we could start with something. Mumble had +60 listeners in the past, I doubt all would participate but if for example 50 people did we could get at least 1M. That way if we lost anything, it would be a small loss divided by everyone.

I'm talking about doins this on our DEX and not Polo since a small amount would immediately be eaten up

I think the blockchain be a platform for trading and not bear the risk nor subsidise the liquidity making.  This role should be handled by someone who is good at it and willing to take some risks eg http://cryptofresh.com/u/exchange.btsbots

The community can chip in with donation to fund a liquidity bot or support an existing one as suggested by Akado.

260
I would learn the codebase and document it for 3-4m
bts per month but i doubt any other senior developer would becausethey would look at chart first and extrapolate.

3-4M = Mille or/ Million?

3500000 BTS = 11893.99 USD --> for learning the codebase?
(You should not forget the advantage you'll get through this (knowledge, contacts, etc).. IMO a way to much)

Did he mean 3 to 4 months?

261
I would learn the codebase and document it for 3-4m
bts per month but i doubt any other senior developer would becausethey would look at chart first and extrapolate.

My estimation is about there too.

262
If you have a project/token and would like to sponsor these events by ShareDropping to the Following Attendees, please do so and provide a little advertisement for your Sharedropped token.  And always remember that the individuals who show up to these hangouts are about as avid of crypto/bitshares fans as it gets, so giving them some of your tokens is essentially giving tokens to a demographic who will be most likely to hold longterm and also participate in your project's initiatives! 

Do not underestimate the value of Sharing a stake in your dreams with these people.  They are guaranteed to be one of the best sharedrop targets available!

#sharebits "Tuck Fheman" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="tuckfheman")
#sharebits "DestBest" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="DestBest")
#sharebits "Bhuz" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="bhuz")
#sharebits "spartako" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="spartako")
#sharebits "lafona" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="lafona")
#sharebits "ingenesist" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="ingenesist")
#sharebits "onceuponatime" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="onceuponatime")
#sharebits "hadrian" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="hadrian")
#sharebits "fuzzy" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="fuzzy")
#sharebits "betax" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="betax")
#sharebits "jcalfee1" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="jcalfee2")
#sharebits "Luca21" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="Luca21")
#sharebits "cube" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="cube")
#sharebits "abit" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="abit")
#sharebits "mangou007" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="Mangou007")
#sharebits "testz" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="testz")
#sharebits "iHashFury" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="ihashfury")
#sharebits "rgcrypto" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="CryptOctopus")
#sharebits "bitbuckster" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="brindleswan")
#sharebits "JWF" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="Jwf-mobile")
#sharebits "Stan" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="Stan")
#sharebits "twitter" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="twitter")
#sharebits "xeldal" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="xeldal")
#sharebits "pc" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="pc")
#sharebits "facer" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="facer")
#sharebits "dmo09" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="dmo09")
#sharebits "xeroc" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="xeroc")
#sharebits "topcandle" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="sxis")
#sharebits "EstefanTT" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="EstefanTT")
#sharebits "thom" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="thom")
#sharebits "gchicken" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="gchicken")
#sharebits "godzirra" [amount] [asset] (MUMBLE="godzirra")
       

@fuzzy I think the sharebit distribution does not work for this round.

263
General Discussion / Re: STEALTH / Confidential Milestones
« on: December 31, 2015, 07:35:12 am »
I don't think Bm said that.
I'm not trying to imply anything. This is an honest question.
If Marker Maker is not in CNX plans for 2016, it's better to know it now, so that we can try offer this job to some other company.
I don't think we need more software changes for market making. We're planning to do market making before long at BlockTrades, for example.

I think the Maker incentive change is to incentivise more parties to become a liquidity bot.  We cannot depend on just one or two potential bot makers.

264
General Discussion / Re: Why I like Ethereum [BLOG POST]
« on: December 31, 2015, 07:16:24 am »
BitShares can process smart-contracts faster and in a more efficient way than Ethereum.
Also, block frequency close to 1 second might be unavailable on Ethereum.
But it's a trade-off because it's harder to deploy a smart-contract on BitShares than on Ethereum.

I believe this trade-off would be a non-issue once (and if) full documentations with easy how-to guides are developed for bitshares.

265
General Discussion / Re: Mutual Aid Society [BLOG POST]
« on: December 31, 2015, 07:06:45 am »
In all practicality, CNX needs to find ways to continue funding its existence.  BM believes pivoting to MAS will provide that.  If the community needed any features/documentation to be carried out in order to continue development for DEX, they would need to find their own fund and set a plan of execution. Thanks Jakub for initiating a new thread for it.

266
I think with a good pay, it is possible to attract good experienced developers to perform this documentation task. FYI, our community have capable people (eg xeroc, pc and roadscape) who can do the job if they are available and like to take up the role. They can form a documentation team or become part of it.  Having quality documentation for bts as it is now is not an easy task.  It would require the team to go deep into the codes in order to map out the logics.  To ease the work, they would need to consult CNX from time to time as Thom suggested.

267
Australia/New Zealand

268
+5%

Thanks.. I was beginning to lose faith in this community.   :-X

A good point to provide 'warning/disclaimer'.  But why are you losing faith?  The software is still new and it needs time to iron out the glitches.

269
General Discussion / Re: New release 2.0.151209
« on: December 17, 2015, 12:42:42 pm »
bitcube updated. All nodes updated to v2.0.121516b

270
General Discussion / Re: Why did we suddnely make two releases in two days?
« on: December 17, 2015, 07:02:49 am »
I appreciate the prompt action and clear explanation.   +5%

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 94