Main > DAC 委托人

如何看待bts里的贿选和政治献金

(1/2) > >>

callmeluc:
怎么样能取悦投票者, 就怎么样好. 没什么说的

 +5% +5%

mtang:
  +5%虽然很同情被当枪使的学生们，但还是要致敬他们的勇敢和梦想

--- Quote from: xfund on September 28, 2014, 01:47:50 pm ---今天，香港占中。向这些热血男儿致敬。 +5%

--- End quote ---

xfund:
今天，香港占中。向这些热血男儿致敬。 +5%

xfund:
BM:
Happy I appreciate the effort you are putting into the ecosystem and hope things go well for you.    One thing I can say is that compared to bitcoin we already have a ton of people reinvesting their fees/profits into helping the community in what ever way they can.

By paying 2/3 to all shareholders he has already helped increase the dividend for everyone and providing incentive for people to take some time to actually vote for him.   If he provides a reliable service then the network will continue to function. 

Lets not demonize people because of a gut reaction to "vote buying".  After all votes are personal property and if you think you benefit more by giving your vote to happy than by giving it to someone else then that is legitimate. 

I would encourage everyone to drop the personal attacks and instead make the case for why voting for some other delegate is *BETTER* than voting for happy.

重要的是：投票要愉快

xfund:
有个村子，村长兢兢业业搞新农村建设，建的像花园（得罪钉子户难免，自己搞十套八套房子难免）。村民，安居乐业（想超生交5000，就不会被强迫人流，其母也不会被关小黑屋）。

严打一来，就进局子了。

然后，新安排了个致富能人当村长。结果，人家啥事也不管，只忙自己的生意。新农村建设资金躺在银行里没人用，计划生育没人管。村民依然安居乐业。

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page